Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
Social › LGBT Adoption Rights
9>9 Personal answerYes, as long as they pass the same background checks as straight couples |
Social › Gay Marriage
9>9 Personal answerTake the government out of marriage and instead make it a religious decision |
the Economy › Equal Pay
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Gun Control
9>9 Personal answerNo, only for criminals and the mentally ill |
Social › Gender Transition
9>9 Personal answerNo |
Social › Gender Identity
9>9 Personal answerNo, we should address gender identity as a mental health issue and provide funds for more research and care |
Social › Religious Freedom Act
9>9 Personal answerYes, any business should be able to deny service for any reason |
Social › Transgender Athletes
9>9 Personal answerNo |
Social › Planned Parenthood Funding
9>9 Personal answerNo, and the government should not give funds to any organizations |
the Economy › Minimum Wage
9>9 Personal answerNo, and eliminate all wage standards |
Domestic Policy › Armed Teachers
9>9 Personal answerNo, hire professionally trained security guards instead |
the Environment › Climate Change
9>9 Personal answerThe Government should increase environmental regulations not to "prevent climate change" (which is an IDIOTIC thing for them to allege to do while simultaneously continuing to "test" nuclear missiles etc. ---which are essentially gigantic microwaves for the planet) but SHOULD increase environmental regulations regarding mass-land/environmental usage. Mass land/environmental usage for ANYTHING is environmentally destructive. "Mass land/environmental usage" could be defined as "any land-or-environmental use which crosses one environment and enters into another." Environmentalists should be the ones to legally define what an environment IS. Restrictions should be placed on the introduction of FORIEGN species, genera, and CHEMICALS and materials general to environments in order to both preserve the planet's environmental diversity -- and consequently the human species. Thank you. |
the Economy › Paid Sick Leave
9>9 Personal answerYes, but the federal government should sponsor this program instead of businesses |
Domestic Policy › Drug Policy
9>9 Personal answerNo, but decriminalize drugs that offer medicinal benefits such as marijuana |
the Economy › Taxes
9>9 Personal answerLower the income tax rate and remove all existing tax loopholes for large corporations |
Social › Racial Sensitivity Training
9>9 Personal answerYes, as long as it covers all protected groups (age, sex, race, disability, sexual orientation, religion) and is not based on critical race theory |
Domestic Policy › Muslim Surveillance
9>9 Personal answerNo, this decision should be based on crime rates instead of race or religion |
Education › Critical Race Theory in K-12 Education
9>9 Personal answerNo, kids should be raised to be racially color blind instead of being taught they are inherently racist or disadvantaged based on the color of their skin |
Education › Free College for All
9>9 Personal answerThe government shouldn't be paying for education to begin with Education should be directly funded by communities, which can apply for community-educational grants (state-wide, not federal-wide) if they are in a lower-income area. The US government is shown to be ineffective at providing education -- it turns out factory products, not thinking humans. It's like the DMV of Education. We certainly don't want that at a university level! |
Education › Student Loans
9>9 Personal answerThe Rich will never be "taxed" per-se, because they don't HAVE income. They HAVE assets, so it's a ridiculous question to begin with. It is also not correct to tax people based off of assets, because I know I certainly can't pay taxes based off of the VALUE of my car. The answer is to *incentivize* the wealthy to take up altruistic pursuits. Make altruism WORTHWHILE for the wealthy. |
Social › Death Penalty
9>9 Personal answerNo, spending life in prison is a harsher sentence |
Social › Confederate Flag
9>9 Personal answerYes, but only at historical monuments where it was originally flown |
Social › Government Mandates
9>9 Personal answerNo |
Domestic Policy › No-Fly List Gun Control
9>9 Personal answerNo, it is unconstitutional to deny someone’s rights without due process |
Domestic Policy › Supreme Court Reform
9>9 Personal answerNo, reforming the Supreme Court is unconstitutional and would upset the balance of power |
Domestic Policy › Gerrymandering
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Social › Women in Combat
9>9 Personal answerYes, as long as they can pass the same physical tests as men |
Healthcare › Medicaid
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Science › Mandatory Vaccinations
9>9 Personal answerNo |
Domestic Policy › Social Media Regulation
9>9 Personal answerYes, social media companies are politically biased and need to be regulated |
Social › Gender Workplace Diversity
9>9 Personal answerYes, and Businesses that have more than 500 employees should ALSO be required to have a third of their board members be actual EMPLOYEE representatives of their company, so that their decisions will be actually fair for/to the people whom they directly affect. |
Immigration › Immigration Healthcare
9>9 Personal answerYes, if they pay taxes |
Elections › Voter Fraud
9>9 Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Corporate Tax
9>9 Personal answerLower, but eliminate deductions and loop holes |
Social › Safe Spaces
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Patriot Act
9>9 Personal answerNo, and pass strict laws prohibiting government surveillance without probable cause and a warrant |
the Economy › Government Spending
9>9 Personal answerThe Government shouldn't decrease "public spending" within the USA. The Government SHOULD stop taking US TAX MONEY and spending it on giving "humanitarian aid" to foreign countries and "special interest programs" of Senators and Congress-People. The US Government should ALSO quit "bailing out" corporations just because they consider them to be the "backbone" of the US economy. The US Government is not a BANK, and should not be giving loans to Corporations regardless of how much money those corporations gave them in funds in the past. I don't care about what happens. It simply shouldn't be done. Ever. |
Healthcare › COVID Employment Health Pass
9>9 Personal answerNo |
Immigration › Border Wall
9>9 Personal answerYes, but make it a high-tech surveillance barrier instead of a physical one |
Domestic Policy › Net Neutrality
9>9 Personal answerNo, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet |
Social › First Amendment
9>9 Personal answerNo, religion is an important aspect of our country’s history |
Domestic Policy › Gun Liability
9>9 Personal answerNo, manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence |
Domestic Policy › Congressional ban on stock trading
9>9 Personal answerNo, and their investments should be held in a blind trust |
Crime › Defunding the Police
9>9 Personal answerUltimately, there should be multiple KINDS of first responders. However, that is EXCESSIVELY costly. Perhaps creating a "violent" police department which is specifically trained to respond to violent situations, and a "non-violent" section, which are merely peace-keepers, would be best? In addition, having abuse-divisions would also be pretty great, since abuse is a bit different than either active-violent-threat, and "non-violent" scenarios. |
Social › Euthanasia
9>9 Personal answerNo, but they should be allowed to refuse artificial life support |
Elections › Right of Foreigners to Vote
9>9 Personal answerNo |
Domestic Policy › Affirmative Action
9>9 Personal answerRegardless, we should create more social programs to address poverty |
the Economy › Universal Basic Income
9>9 Personal answerNo, this will encourage people not to work and harm economic growth |
Domestic Policy › Flag Burning
9>9 Personal answerNo, this is a violation of free speech |
the Economy › Welfare
9>9 Personal answerSince this decision is set by individual states, I don't feel that there is a "pat answer" to this question. Some states need to increase restrictions, others need to decrease their restrictions. |
Crime › Demilitarize the Police
9>9 Personal answerYes, but with strict training on how and when to use the equipment |
the Economy › Welfare Drug Testing
9>9 Personal answerYes, but provide treatment for those testing positive |
the Economy › Economic Stimulus
9>9 Personal answerYes, but in the form of tax breaks for low income citizens |
the Economy › Capital Gains Tax
9>9 Personal answerNo |
Immigration › In-State Tuition
9>9 Personal answerYes, as long as they pay taxes |
Healthcare › Obamacare
9>9 Personal answerObama-care has forced low-wage earners to switch from working 1 full-time job, to 2 part time jobs. This has PRIMARILY affected single-mothers, since they are the PRIMARY category which works in the low-wage sector. I consider it to be a failure of a plan. But parts of it are good. For example -- medical assistance being available on a sliding scale. That part of it is good. |
the Economy › Overtime Pay
9>9 Personal answerYes, and all employees should be paid time-and-a-half for overtime hours regardless of their pay scale |
Domestic Policy › Eminent Domain
9>9 Personal answerNo, and the government should never be allowed to seize private property |
Elections › Electoral College
9>9 Personal answerNo, the electoral college ensures representation of the whole country instead of just major cities |
Foreign Policy › Military Spending
9>9 Personal answerThe Military is an outdated barbaric way of settling disputes. In the age of the atomic bomb, ALL WARFARE is null, and void. Disagreements should be settled SENSIBLY, and BRUTE FORCE restricted only to special operations to remove war-mongers -- wherever they may be. |
Science › Nuclear Energy
9>9 Personal answerYes, as long as there is no public subsidy |
Foreign Policy › Torture
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Science › GMO Labels
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Housing › Homeless Encampments
9>9 Personal answerAll property SHOULD be "public" since the idea of "land ownership" is ridiculous to begin with. |
Transportation › Public Transportation
9>9 Personal answerYes, but only if the spending goes towards environmentally friendly solutions |
the Economy › Estate Tax
9>9 Personal answerYes, and we should eliminate it |
the Environment › Plastic Product Ban
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Crime › Criminal Voting Rights
9>9 Personal answerYes, except for felons convicted of murder or violent crimes |
Foreign Policy › Terrorism
9>9 Personal answerNo, they are not U.S. citizens and do not have constitutional rights |
National Security › Military Congressional Approval
9>9 Personal answerI think the job of the President should cease to include "Commander in-chief of the US Military" as part of the job description. In the era of George Washington and pop-guns, it made sense. It doesn't make sense in our modern era for a person who is elected every 4 years (and consequently has no military experience) to make military decisions. Commander-in-chief of the US Armed Forces should be an experienced General at least. |
the Environment › Paris Climate Agreement
9>9 Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Tech Monopolies
9>9 Personal answerYes, and the government should alter the monopoly-laws to make mega-corporations with many many branches STILL COUNT as Monopolies, when they INFACT control the entire market by their many branches. |
National Security › Foreign Assassination
9>9 Personal answerSince it is imperative in our modern world to PREVENT large-scale warfare given the existence of nuclear weaponry, it is acceptable and imperative to assassinate terrorists wherever they are on the planet. I'm not sure just the USA should be doing this however. I feel like it should be a Global Council who makes such decisions, versus only one country. |
Domestic Policy › Political Advertising on Social Media
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Edward Snowden
9>9 Personal answerYes, he should be protected under the Whistleblower Protection Act |
the Economy › Tariffs
9>9 Personal answerYes, this will help create and save more jobs |
Domestic Policy › Air Force One
9>9 Personal answerNo, not until the cost ($4B) is dramatically reduced |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You side slightly towards “security”, meaning you more often believe the government should do everything within its power to ensure the security of its citizens. This theme is most important to you.
You are a centrist on left wing and right wing issues. This theme is more important to you.
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. This theme is more important to you.
You are a centrist on democratic socialism and capitalism issues. This theme is more important to you.
You side slightly towards “nationalism”, meaning you more often support policies that prioritize the interests of our nation above others. This theme is more important to you.
You are a centrist on politically incorrect and politically correct issues. This theme is more important to you.
You are a centrist on unilateralism and multilateralism issues. This theme is more important to you.
You side slightly towards “religious”, meaning you more often support policies that reflect religious values and principles. This theme is more important to you.
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “deregulation”, meaning you more often believe that government regulation stifles innovation and economic prosperity. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on assimilation and multiculturalism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on pacifism and militarism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on traditional and progressive issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on isolationism and imperialism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on individualism and collectivism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “decentralization”, meaning you more often believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on tender and tough issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on small government and big government issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on keynesian and laissez-faire issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on anthropocentrism and environmentalism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on meritocracy and democracy issues. This theme is only less important to you.
Based on 16 questions that are ranked more important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked more important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 18 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 15 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked less important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked less important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked less important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.