Planned Parenthood is a non-profit organization that provides reproductive health services in the United States and internationally. Each year federal and state governments provide the organization with $528 million in funding (40% of its annual budget). The majority of this funding comes from Medicaid which subsidizes reproductive healthcare for low-income women. In 2014, abortions accounted for 3% of the services they provided. The majority of the other services include screening for and treating sexually transmitted diseases and infections and providing contraception. Proponents of funding argue that federal funding for Planned Parenthood does not pay for abortions and that the vast majority of government funding that the organization receives is through Medicaid reimbursements. Opponents of funding argue that the government should not fund any organizations that provide abortions.
@ISIDEWITH7yrs
@ISIDEWITH7yrs
Yes, their services reach far beyond abortions and can save many lives through cancer screening, prenatal services, and adoption referrals
@ISIDEWITH7yrs
No, and the government should not give funds to any organizations that perform abortions
@ISIDEWITH7yrs
Yes, as long as funding is not used for abortion procedures
@ISIDEWITH7yrs
No, and the government should not give funds to any organizations
@8Z3BWCQ12mos
No, and the government should not give funds to any organizations that perform abortions, provide abortion counseling or referrals, advocate to decriminalize abortion, or expand abortion services
@4NDJMDG2yrs
No because of the selling of fetal body parts and the fact that the funding goes directly back to the Democratic Party.
Planned Parenthood isn’t simply for abortions. My mom had 5 miscarriages before having me. Those cost $10,000 each unless you want to pee out a dead baby, which is very traumatizing. Planned Parenthood makes things like that more affordable as well as birth control, which I use to regulate my periods and save myself from cramps. Before birth control, some cramps were so bad I missed weeks of school and had to be hospitalized. If you take away the idea of Planned Parenthood entirely, it makes like living hell for women who have these struggles.
@4N9ZBRV2yrs
No. The government should not be funding a private health care service.
@4NDB6ZT2yrs
If tax dollars go to abortion clinics, then the tax dollars allocated should be split with half going to abortion clinics, and half going to adoption agencies.
@8P4F8NH2yrs
if u care so much about the children in orphanges, go adopt a child. save a child whoś physically breathing, who can feel and think and is struggling in the system. dont worry about some cells that arent even in your body but in another womans and you just feel entitled to tell her its wrong.
@4NC9RW32yrs
The government should only award grants to private non-profit organizations.
@57DWNNF2yrs
In cases of rape or incest but must be proven that it was that lie detector tests or prosecuting the perpetrator
@4NC4C5S2yrs
No the affordable care act has provisions to eliminate the need of planned parenthood
@5LFCKS92yrs
Yes, but not to be used for support or performance of abortions that violate the abortion-rule I would impose. That rule is:
Abortion ought to be allowed early, NOT after the embryo has developed neurologically enough likely to be able to feel pain or fear or to be able to suffer, UNLESS the mother will die or sustain life-threatening or other very serious health-harm if abortion does not occur. Rape or incest is not excuse. Violations (the pregnant woman’s and the abortionist’s) must be treated as homicide (whether negligent homicide, manslaughter, or murder depending upon the special facts of the particular case).
@4N8N3DX2yrs
Planned Parenthood execs and docs that killed babies born alive after abortions should be charged with murder.
@4YF82WW2yrs
Planned Parenthood is a really odd system anyway--the govenment shouldn't be giving so much money to an outside organization they have little oversight of.
@4X6M2LC2yrs
Yes, and end the Hyde Amendment. Abortion is health care.
@577VF9G2yrs
I would support planned Parenthood if they do not do abortions. I think they should do referrals for adoptions, cancer screening. But isn't Affordable Health Care there for women for the prenatal services and other health issues. Are we not being taxed twice?
@5DHYRSX2yrs
No, for the simple fact that they were known for the sterilization of women of color.
No. Planned parenthood is a racist eugenics organization that was created to eliminate all black people from the earth by legally murdering their babies.
@SincerelyLaurenn 2yrs
Planned Parenthood isn’t simply for abortions. My mom had 5 miscarriages before having me. Those cost $10,000 each unless you want to pee out a dead baby, which is very traumatizing. Planned Parenthood makes things like that more affordable as well as birth control, which I use to regulate my periods and save myself from cramps. Before birth control, some cramps were so bad I missed weeks of school and had to be hospitalized. If you take away the idea of Planned Parenthood entirely, it makes like living hell for women who have these struggles.
@5DJXCRV2yrs
@5B6J2QC2yrs
Yes and sterilize people on welfare
@57BNBTP2yrs
government should fund women/children clinics for women below a certain income level with free birth control for all people 17 or older, but not if they perform abortions.
@4NC7GLV2yrs
Government should fund all medical coverage as they do for our legislature.
@5C94F922yrs
Yes, if Planned Parenthood adopts a biblical perspective of what parenting means and they continue to provide cancer screening, prenatal services, and adoption referrals. Pregnancies that are a result of rape, incest or would endanger the life of the mother should be referred out to hospitals and social service organizations for abused women
@5CH8DLG2yrs
@4N84HGN2yrs
Planned parenthood appears to provide mostly services to young women who participate in unprotected sex. Especially underage who parents should be help responsible thus pay for services.
@4XRGPYP2yrs
No, because these services are now covered under Obamacare
@5CBHMRY2yrs
No - there are other ways that people get funding for the cancer screening, prenatal services, etc... ever heard of Obamacare?? WIC?? Welfare?? Food Stamps??
@98XPVNJ51mins
Yes, but within reasonable budgets and audits.
@98XNK4Q2hrs
yes but abortions are choices
@98XGQ5W5hrs
The government should not support it with taxpayer money, they should instead make those who need the abortions/etc. pay for it themselves. But they can still fund it for smaller things ie. condoms, educating the youth, etc.
@98XGBGT5hrs
Yes, for family's that make under a specific amount to help more poor families
@98XDZGZ6hrs
Yes, but the government should put less funding into Planned Parenthood.
@98V8QRT6hrs
Keep the funding as it is right now.
@98XDBC66hrs
I don't really have a opinion on this topic
@98X67MXRepublican22hrs
No, privatize this level of health care.
@98X4SPF1 day
Yes, but only for providing things people can't afford. People should have to go though an application process to receive benefits from Planned Parenthood
@98X3NNZ1 day
dunno what that mean 🤣😂🤣😂
@98WYNXC2 days
But women that are in need should not be denied medical care or counseling…. I am Pro-Choice, but would try to talk anyone out of doing it, but THEIR choice.
@98WY5WD2 days
No, the government absolutely should not be funding or offering something that allows people who actively and consciously make bad decisions to negate the responsibility or consequences of their actions.
@98WWFKS2 days
i don't have enough knowledge to make an answer
The historical activity of users engaging with this question.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
