Try the political quiz

431 Replies

@5V3XVNNDemocratfrom Colorado  answered…12mos

Internet should be a service like water, sewer and electric. Just another utility.

@64MJ5X4Democratfrom New York  answered…12mos

No. The internet should be treated as a utility like it is in other countries. Our access speed is much slower than other countries and it's embarrassing.

@9W5S8YGPeace and Freedom from Missouri answered…2mos

@9VB6KCNConstitution from Oregon answered…4mos

@9TRYSRHLibertarian from Colorado answered…5mos

@9J8VYW9Democrat from Wisconsin answered…1yr

@9HWCW34Peace and Freedom from Colorado answered…1yr

yes they should speed it up for people that pay more but dont slow the people who pay less.

@9HT8PRSPeace and Freedom from Illinois answered…1yr

No. Because the internet permeates so much of our lives now it is functionally a need and should be considered a public utility.

@9H6YBSHPeace and Freedom from California answered…1yr

Yes, but only if they are not receiving any government subsidy... and if they do it should be transparent

@9GXBG5SLibertarian from Georgia answered…1yr

Yes but within reason, there should be minimums in place so everyone can compete.

@9G4NJKBSocialist from New York answered…1yr

No, this would be unconstitutional and add more favor to the wealthiest websites; there's too much of that already.

@9FTNYM3Green from Missouri answered…1yr

@9FDV39HVeteran from Kentucky answered…1yr

No, they should speed up access to all sites, especially in rural areas with terrible internet for the price of good internet.

@9FCQCG6Veteran from North Carolina answered…1yr

No, they should not slow any down, but should be allowed to charge more to boost the speeds. It's frustrating to go to a popular site and have to wait because so much traffic is ahead of you.

@9FC3DNWGreenfrom Maine  answered…1yr

No, and provide high-quallity, free-at-the-point-of-service federally owned broadband.

@9HDMV6TVeteran from North Carolina answered…1yr

@9DXB9DMWomen’s Equality from Missouri answered…1yr

@9TDQWQBSocialist from Kansas answered…6mos

No, and establish a public telecommunications company to build broadband infrastructure and provide affordable wireless broadband and 5G service.

@9SV9KH5Independentfrom Maine  answered…7mos

@9SBQPN4Republican from Texas answered…8mos

The market place has shown Net Neutrality to non-relevant because technology has resolved the issues with speed. Government involvement has shown continually shows its ignorance and only wishes to obtain governance and power.

@9RVRD9BWomen’s Equality from Alabama answered…8mos

No, just let spacex find out the way to the future buddy lol.

@9R2NKKDVeteran from New Jersey answered…10mos

Internet shouldn’t be taxed and there should be high power internet for everyone at the same price

@9QSWWWCPeace and Freedom from Florida answered…10mos

there should be no private property, and no monetary currency system, this would remove conflict altogether.

@9N9VSL7Independent from South Carolina answered…12mos

Not beyond an initial pay-per-quality model. If not to ban pornographic sites, they may be slowed down beyond an initial model to improve other sites. Access to sites that are down should be slowed, until they are back up.

@9MHG2BBLibertarian from Massachusetts answered…12mos

Yes, but the industry should be deregulated to allow more competition.

@Andrew-SkeensLibertarian from Pennsylvania answered…12mos

Yes, private service providers should not be regulated by the government

@9M2Y5QFGreen from Minnesota answered…12mos

Depends on if we’re continuing to promote capitalism. If yes then yes. If no then what are we proposing as a reasonable alternative?

@9LZ4SW5Libertarian from Pennsylvania answered…12mos

Yes, of course a company should be able to offer a product. And another ISP can come along and offer a less restricted product---let the consumer decide.

@natet92Constitution from Michigan answered…12mos

Yes, but this only works if there is not a monopoly on the service.

@9LJL4D7Libertarianfrom Maine  answered…12mos

@9LHR4FPLibertarian from South Carolina answered…12mos

Yes, I disagree, but it is their right to manage their own business.

@9K8MSF5Women’s Equality from North Carolina answered…1yr

@9JTY9GKRepublican from Kansas answered…1yr

Yes, but they should clearly disclose their policy to customers

@9JS28WHSocialist from Massachusetts answered…1yr

No, this is a violation of free speech and should not be permitted for platforms so broad as internet service providers.

@9TF3QV2Republican from West Virginia answered…6mos

@9SNH6MCLibertarian from Minnesota answered…7mos

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet. To do otherwise to allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices.

@9SLFGXQLibertarian from Minnesota answered…7mos

@9XLBNJ4Socialist from Tennessee answered…4 days

@9XHT8N2Women’s Equality from Wisconsin answered…7 days

@RobinHoudeDemocratfrom Georgia  answered…1wk

No, and internet service providers should be regulated as utilities

@9XDXLGXVeteran from North Carolina answered…2wks

@9XDX728Republican from Florida answered…2wks


The historical activity of users engaging with this question.

Loading data...

Loading chart...