No, and get rid of all this forced diversity bs.
I Don't understand what this means
No, simply because studies show that the training is ineffective.
No, it wastes time for employees who aren't discriminatory, just ensure discrimination won't be accepted
No. Because the government doesn’t know how to treat humans with kindness either
No but if you know an employee is without a doubt and have proof he/she is racist to any one regardless of color they should be fired
No!! Never indoctrinate others!
No, and ban private companies from doing the same.
Yes, as long as it covers all protected groups
Yes, and include LGBT topics and how to cooperate and help mentally or physically disabled people effectively and everyone in federal government and private companies should have to go to help them understand this
Yes, and require topics on other minorities/discriminated groups and extend the requirement to private companies as well.
@9NDCYG7Independent12mos
I think it needs to exist but not be federally enforced
@9N8CG62Constitution12mos
No, but have strict guidelines and accountability concerning discrimination on any basis not relevant to the codified procedure - even those not pertaining to faith, race, sex, disability, or sexual orientation. Agency policy can mandate asking a few hypothetical questions to determine likelihood of guideline compliance.
Yes, and also include LGBTQ+ topics Yes, and extend the requirement to private companies as well Yes, as long as it covers all protected groups (age, sex, race, disability, sexual orientation, religion) and is not based on critical race theory
Yes, this should also be require by private companies and should include LGBTQ+ topics as well
Don’t know what that is.
No, Racial sensitivity training and critical race theory are innately racist.
YES, and include all minorities in this. This should also be required by private companies
Yes, as well as all other protected groups (age, sex, race, disability, sexual orientation, religion).
yes, if someone is pretty racist
no people just shouldn't suck
@9L4QVZPIndependent12mos
Not allowed to give opinion on subject matter
Yes, but only in the case of prior sensitivity issues
yes but only for racial people
@9KBL37KConstitution12mos
No simply because the bias of those running it can become and issue race should never even be mentioned. But the elite at like to keep race problem going. Makes them money. I would rather see our world seeking peace but not by force by letting people alone and don’t bring up race
Depends on what racial sensitivity training actually entails.
Yes, include LGBTQ+ topics and extend it to every business, both private and public.
should offer it as an option
Yes, but only for those who fall into the category of racists or racially insensitive
The State should be abolished, but so long as there is a state, it ought to have racial sensitivity training.
Yes, diversity training should be required when employees interact directly with members of the public.
The federal government should have reduced control on the private market
No, if an adult is not mature enough, they should be fired
The government should never require a private business to do anything
Yes, with LGBTQ+ topics, and extend to private companies.
Yes, but also include LGBTQIA+ and Women's topics as well
No, and reinstate segregation nationwide.
Yes, but also include LGBTQIAP+ and Women's topics as well
Yes, as long as it includes all protected groups
Only if it’s realistic.
Yes, as long as it covers all protected groups (age, sex, race, disability, sexual orientation, religion) and is extended to private companies as well
Yes, but Federal contractors are exempt.
Yes, as long as it covers all protected groups and is based on critical race theory.
No. Some people are mean. Adults should be able to get over it.
I am an anarchist so I don't support the existance of government property
No, it doesn't solve anything
No, this has been proven to have the opposite of the desired effect. Training people to hyperfocus on race creates racism.
There shouldn't be government employees. It should stop existing.
Yes, and it should also cover other groups such as the LGBTQ+ community, religious minority groups, disabled people, etc.
The historical activity of users engaging with this question.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
