Try the political quiz
+

Sort by

Filter by tag

Discussions tagged as:

Combine more tags:

Options

 @9TTR7H8 from Minnesota answered…43mins43m

No, this would be a huge waste of time and money, also a significant percentage of 18 years aren't fit for service.

 @9TTNW9N from California answered…5hrs5H

I think as of now stay giving the same amount unless something happens where it is crucial we increase or decrease our spending

 @9TTNM8N from California answered…5hrs5H

Yes but don't send billions of dollars to them and make sure they are held accountable for any war crimes

 @9TTLNHN from Arizona answered…6hrs6H

No, I believe the U.S. should take a neutral stance as there are more domestic issues that could use that attention and support.

 @9TTJ644 from North Carolina answered…8hrs8H

Keep the federal spendings the same but don’t aid non-military personnels except political career participants.

 @9TTHZB8from Guam  answered…8hrs8H

Yes, as long as it doesn't remove the responsibility from the person or state employing it for any wrong targeting

 @9TTFSWQ from Minnesota answered…9hrs9H

If they are a foreign citizen they should be tried for their crimes against humanity on an international stage.

 @9TTFQJF from Illinois answered…9hrs9H

The bigger issue is what to spend on. The war in Ukraine is really changing how warfare is conducted.

 @9TTBMZX from Connecticut answered…11hrs11H

The government should be able to perform searches and extensive checking which may go past constitutional right in order to prevent terrorism.

 @9TT93RJ from Nebraska answered…12hrs12H

I don't think we should be supporting either. we need to focus on what is happening in out own borders.

 @9TT8GFN from Utah answered…13hrs13H

Increase or decrease as needed, but we should not aid any countries who have human rights violations or harbor/promote terrorism.

 @9TT8GFN from Utah answered…13hrs13H

Increase only as necessary to have proper equipment, current technology, and well cared for personnel.

 @9TT8D7G from Alabama answered…13hrs13H

Neither, I am satisfied with the current spending but it should be decreased after global conflicts and tensions ease.

 @9TT8D7G from Alabama answered…13hrs13H

The focus should be on a ceasefire and pulling weapon support. The US’s relationship with Israel is delicate and the goal should be to protect Palestinians with…

 @9TT6TWP from California answered…13hrs13H

I think we need to do more humanitarianism for both Isreal and Palestine and focus less on the weapons

 @9TT5F5J from Utah answered…14hrs14H

Decrease spending and end most spending on foreign military spending and then increase funding for domestic protection.

 @9TT53B8 from Virginia answered…14hrs14H

The people all suffer, their leaders deserve to be called to task for the unnecessary bloodshed they have created.