Should the military use weapons guided by artificial intelligence?

Only some weapons... ... and I think that they should be able to be guided by artificial AND human intelligence - human intelligence first.

Yes, but only when the artificial intelligence is completely ready and foolproof, and it shouldn't be used for all weapons.

Yes, but only to refine targeting. AI isn't ready for autonomous targeting with an extreme risk of collateral.

Yes, but only after rigorous testing has taken place to reduce errors to levels below human-controlled operation

Yes, as long as appropriate safeguards and testing is in place and the ultimate decision making still remains with a human.

Yes only if the ai can target opposing armies and only opposing armies better than the average human.

Yes, but the AI should be fully controlled and all the possible outcomes should be thought of and planned just in case something goes wrong.

Yes, absolutely. But if countries abuse these weapons then the US should no longer supply them with this technology.

Yes, but only on the basis that it can operate with an accuracy rating higher than human accuracy in whichever sector that it functions in.

after we test the effectiveness of AI-guided weapons, only if it is proven effective with the desired effect

they could but they should also keep in mind to not let artificial intelligence get full power over them

Yes, but only if AI is strictly under our control for future purposes and not likely to overthrow humanity.

It depends, if the ai has been tested a multitude of times and is proven to work, then yes, if not, then no.

I think that ai should be used for only for things such as air control and water control so we know if anyone is trying to sneak into the US illegally or sneak anything in.

Ya'll ready for Skynet?

in many cases this will be useful, but can definitely backfire. without it however, others may excel past us if we don't utilize ai for warfare.

Not exclusively, i.e. there should always be a human in charge to override any AI's programming. AI should be used to provide valuable data and recommendations on making decision, not for making decisions themselves without oversight.

To an extent. We should experiment with such weapons and test them in labs, but they shouldn’t be a standard in warfare until more research is conducted to clarify their actual impact

We cannot fully rely on Artificial Intelligence as it continuously evolves and still has room for error.

they should work in tandem with the AI. using one over the other can cause human error or problems within the AI itself.

yes but only when artificial intelligence is at its peak and will be the least likely to malfunction and or make mistakes

the use of guided weaponry should be restricted and used less on and in civilian populated areas, however they should be used in the battlefield to restrict human casualties. weaponry should be guided by people and if they're guided by people at a distance if need be but using AI to guide weaponry should pose restrictions based on who its used on, where its used, if its safe to use, ect.

No, because current AI technology can be unpredictable and errors that could happen would be devastating.

No and NEVER, weapons should ALWAYS, ALWAYS be used and handled by Human Beings. Movies and past events have proven again and again that AI should NEVER EVER be used in anything really, but ESPECIALLY weapons.

Yes, but they shouldn't be able to think for themselves, they should just follow the command on where to go, but also know if they messed up, or if the missile is damaged, or any of the above.

No, because there is room for failure in the intention of said AI's programming along with an override.

NO! AI is not the solution to everything, and it is not a reliable source of information or solutions to a problem, if you are programming a missile to know where it is and where it isn't that's fine but if you want AI to practically run the Military and to an extent the government then you are setting us up for failure and our downfall.

for some things yes other things no. I think missiles and icbms yes but aviation vehicles like planes and helicopters no.

Yes, but this artificial intelligence should be an aid, not the end all, be all. There should still be human involvement in the use of weaponry.

Yes and no we have to manage who, what, and how these AI weapons are being controlled because it can be useful but again it can get out of control.

El crear una Nueva inteligencia para armas Seria completamente una locura por que estariamos enfatizando El crear Nueva Guerras aun que fueran usadas para defensa

Maybe, that's like fighting a war with technology not people--which I am on board with but at the same time wars are a people issue not a technology issue and there is no point in a war where you loose nothing but fake intelligence.

Yes, but only when the technology gets more accurate along with having a human along side it to make sure everything run smooth.

as long as it has been well tested and we know for a fact it wont turn on us and try and kill us like that one movie.

In some instances, they are beneficial; however, in the majority of cases, AI should not be used in the military.

Possibly for certain tasks but none that actually interfere with humans. AI could be used for defense but not for actual shooting.

yes, to an extent because if AI takes over, people will be out of a job and will not be able to fight for their country

So long as it's tested and proved that inaccuracies and miscalculation should be fine, then sure. Save human lives and keep our men in safety instead of out in the battlefield where they could be hurt.

Well this would help the safety of soldiers and put less people on the field but what if machines go wrong and cause more distructions and conflict and or when they are very updated they could turn against us yk.

I believe we should implement it under certain causes because the world is becoming more advanced every day.

The military gets a lot of money poured into it so I'm pretty sure that if they decided to let AI guide them they would be safe.

Only if the AI was tested multiples times to be secured and not hacked by a foreign enemy who wants to destroy America.

Yes, as long as there is always a human in the loop that makes the final judgement on the use of the weapon.

No defense only. Can we make a better shield with the use of aI?Yes, that would be preferable.Can we make a better gun With the use of aI?No that would not be preferable.

probably not man i feel like they would do some mean things to us if we pissed em off yk what im saying?

Yes, HOWEVER, the AI should be heavily trained and processed first before actually putting it on the field. PERFECT IT FIRST