for those under pacifistic religions, this is intolerance. that is only one of the many reasons it shouldn't be allowed.
@9XKGHNBTranshumanist5 days
No and reqiure presidents to participate in battles
Yes, but without deployment or combat.
Yes, with option for other non military service
Yes, with the option of national service for those who do not want to serve in the military.
No, a military of volunteers makes the most formidable foe
No, unless needed. It should be offered to those building a criminal record as alternative to incarceration.
Yes, except women or sick people.
No, at least not ALL of them. There should be physical and psychological requirements.
Yes, with the restrictions that single child households and single parents can opt out to focus on family legacy, and felons/ habitual criminals should be barred from participation to prevent criminal activity and risks to military information.
It should be of choice
Either 2 years of military service or 2 years of service in the Peace Corps or similar organization.
No, the military isn't for everyone, but it should be pushed further. For free community college, they should require a year or more for service of some sort.
No, not millitary service but public service that could be met by military service
No way! That could seriously mentally and emotionally damage people who cannot handle military life!
Yes, or some form of volunteer time such as Peace Corps.
I would support a national service corp, but not military service
Only during a time of war.
Like the system in Korea where they have mandatory term for service, with the exception of those unfit for service anyway, and place those who cannot do it when they need to into a different civil service sector. With a term of 1 year.
Every 18 year old citizen should be required to take basic military training with only a voluntary commitment to service.
No, but strictly because that isn't what America stands for. I believe every individual should be required to serve 2 years in either military or local community service.
Yes, but the service should not be limited to military but encompass community and/or federal service.
It should be a few weeks of training not a year
Or community service commitment
Yes, but with exceptions in cases involving mental health or physical disabilities.
No, but women should also be required to register with Selective Service.
Yes, or another form of civil service (Police, EMS, Fire, ect.) and a minimum of 2 yrs for military or police service and 3 for the rest.
No, conscript armies are ineffective and unprofessional.
Yes, after graduating high school all males 2 years and all females 1 year with the option to make it a career .
No, but it should be required that they do one year of some kind of public service, whether it be military or civil.
No it should be voluntary because some people would not be able to do it because of disabilities or medical conditions.
No, but every 18 year old citizen should be required to partake in at least two years of public service; be it military, police, firefighter, hospital or volunteer work
Everyone should sign up for selective service
Yes, but military service could be replaced with humanitarian service
No, but reform our civic and Liberal arts education to counter the woke and marxist/poatmodernist brainwashing of the young
No but one year of service in the country not the military outside your local area I would support
No, but the military should hire anyone who applies as a guaranteed work institution instead of only hiring the physically fit.
Yes, I believe every citizen who is physically and mentally capable should serve their country for a predetermined amount of time and that this benefits both the individual serving and the country.
no unless in war time
They should have not done away with the draft.
I believe that the service provides a different perspective on life than what a lot of people see and understand. I think it’s important that people experience it so they open their horizons. However, it is not for everyone.
Yes, but only if they have the physical abilities to do so. Exemption if going to further education or employment
Yes, and it should be two years of service if they are able bodied. If not able bodied than it should be two years of service to there ability in non combat duty.
I believe the people should have the choice to join, and if they do, should serve at least 1-2 years
I don't think military service should be mandatory, but public service (firefighting, peace corp, habitat for humanity, army corps of engineers etc.) should be. Not everyone feels inclined to pick up a gun and defend the country, and for all the pacifists to play their part, they should be required to serve in a non-violent way that accommodates their beliefs.
Yes, but not active duty for those who do not plan to remain in the military.
Neither. It depends on whether it is needed or not in the situation.
Yes to service, but not with military service as the only option.
Every 18 year old should be required to provide at least one year of community service - garbage, gardening, cleaning, beautifying, social work, etc.
The historical activity of users engaging with this question.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
