Try the political quiz

2,582 Replies

@9XLGBFJAlliance ’90/The Greensfrom Tennessee  answered…4 days

for those under pacifistic religions, this is intolerance. that is only one of the many reasons it shouldn't be allowed.

@9XKGHNBTranshumanist from Texas answered…5 days

@9XDGLC5Democrat from Florida answered…2wks

@9XCL2TKTranshumanist from Maryland answered…2wks

Yes, with the option of national service for those who do not want to serve in the military.

@9X9BMTDVeteran from Connecticut answered…2wks

@9X4887YDemocrat from California answered…3wks

No, unless needed. It should be offered to those building a criminal record as alternative to incarceration.

@9WYNFY4Working Family from Florida answered…4wks

No, at least not ALL of them. There should be physical and psychological requirements.

@9WTY4KBDemocrat from Oklahoma answered…4wks

Yes, with the restrictions that single child households and single parents can opt out to focus on family legacy, and felons/ habitual criminals should be barred from participation to prevent criminal activity and risks to military information.

@9GKH6K8Veteran from Colorado answered…1yr

Either 2 years of military service or 2 years of service in the Peace Corps or similar organization.

@9GD3973Women’s Equality from Kentucky answered…1yr

No, the military isn't for everyone, but it should be pushed further. For free community college, they should require a year or more for service of some sort.

@9G8H88ZVeteran from Alabama answered…1yr

No, not millitary service but public service that could be met by military service

@9G4NJKBSocialist from New York answered…1yr

No way! That could seriously mentally and emotionally damage people who cannot handle military life!

@9G42ZLLRepublican from Minnesota answered…1yr

@9G3478MPeace and Freedom from Pennsylvania answered…1yr

I would support a national service corp, but not military service

@9FZDYRHWomen’s Equality from New Mexico answered…1yr

Like the system in Korea where they have mandatory term for service, with the exception of those unfit for service anyway, and place those who cannot do it when they need to into a different civil service sector. With a term of 1 year.

@9FYQ2Y2Independent from Ohio answered…1yr

Every 18 year old citizen should be required to take basic military training with only a voluntary commitment to service.

@9FTZNTJWorking Family from Florida answered…1yr

No, but strictly because that isn't what America stands for. I believe every individual should be required to serve 2 years in either military or local community service.

@9FQZYZKRepublican from Nebraska answered…1yr

Yes, but the service should not be limited to military but encompass community and/or federal service.

@9FPBJQXVeteran from New Jersey answered…1yr

@9FKTK8TRepublican from South Carolina answered…1yr

Yes, but with exceptions in cases involving mental health or physical disabilities.

@9FCMKTSLibertarian from New York answered…1yr

No, but women should also be required to register with Selective Service.

@9FBXNRHLibertarian from Florida answered…1yr

Yes, or another form of civil service (Police, EMS, Fire, ect.) and a minimum of 2 yrs for military or police service and 3 for the rest.

@9FB58M2Republican from Missouri answered…1yr

@9F9YR6RIndependent from Ohio answered…1yr

Yes, after graduating high school all males 2 years and all females 1 year with the option to make it a career .

@9F8KBP4Women’s Equality from Virginia answered…1yr

No, but it should be required that they do one year of some kind of public service, whether it be military or civil.

@9F8DCWPWomen’s Equality from Minnesota answered…1yr

No it should be voluntary because some people would not be able to do it because of disabilities or medical conditions.

@9F8DWVLVeteran from Arizona answered…1yr

No, but every 18 year old citizen should be required to partake in at least two years of public service; be it military, police, firefighter, hospital or volunteer work

@9VLLSD8Working Family from Virginia answered…3mos

@9VL9FN8Peace and Freedom from Washington answered…3mos

Yes, but military service could be replaced with humanitarian service

@Popescu-IonRepublicanfrom Maine  answered…4mos

No, but reform our civic and Liberal arts education to counter the woke and marxist/poatmodernist brainwashing of the young

@9VF5M87Democrat from New York answered…4mos

No but one year of service in the country not the military outside your local area I would support

@9V662D4Socialist from Texas answered…5mos

No, but the military should hire anyone who applies as a guaranteed work institution instead of only hiring the physically fit.

@9V39JM2Independent from Maryland answered…5mos

Yes, I believe every citizen who is physically and mentally capable should serve their country for a predetermined amount of time and that this benefits both the individual serving and the country.

@9TN6MYFRepublican from Florida answered…6mos

@9TFCQ22Veteran from Pennsylvania answered…6mos

I believe that the service provides a different perspective on life than what a lot of people see and understand. I think it’s important that people experience it so they open their horizons. However, it is not for everyone.

@9TBVJZ2Republican from Kansas answered…6mos

Yes, but only if they have the physical abilities to do so. Exemption if going to further education or employment

@9T43PCKIndependent from Ohio answered…6mos

Yes, and it should be two years of service if they are able bodied. If not able bodied than it should be two years of service to there ability in non combat duty.

@9SZ5JCVWomen’s Equality from Missouri answered…7mos

I believe the people should have the choice to join, and if they do, should serve at least 1-2 years

@9SXN2NTDemocrat from Massachusetts answered…7mos

I don't think military service should be mandatory, but public service (firefighting, peace corp, habitat for humanity, army corps of engineers etc.) should be. Not everyone feels inclined to pick up a gun and defend the country, and for all the pacifists to play their part, they should be required to serve in a non-violent way that accommodates their beliefs.

@9SXD6Y2Veteran from Texas answered…7mos

Yes, but not active duty for those who do not plan to remain in the military.

@9SWMFTMDemocratfrom Maine  answered…7mos

Neither. It depends on whether it is needed or not in the situation.

@9SSCFC2Independent from Colorado answered…7mos

Yes to service, but not with military service as the only option.

@9SLHKJGPeace and Freedom from Wisconsin answered…7mos

Every 18 year old should be required to provide at least one year of community service - garbage, gardening, cleaning, beautifying, social work, etc.


The historical activity of users engaging with this question.

Loading data...

Loading chart...