We should push for an organization that only allows countries who respect human rights to have a say. Example: Why was Uganda under Idi Amin in the `70s and Lybia in 2003 allowed to have Najat al-Hajjaji in charge of the UN human rights commission? Like asking Hitler to oversee violations in a Concentration camp.
Calling the UN a "world government" is fallacious. It's more akin to an international negotiating table with a name and a permanent staff to keep it running. What we need is an actual world government. See you in 100 years.
What UN? The one that ignores the human rights violations of Saudi and the other Islamic terrorists factories? Why does it exist? Human Rights are not involved in the current agenda. If it exists it should function as it is funded. Currently it does not.
Donald Trump is correct. We need to renegotiate our affiliation with both the UN and NATO. If they cannot begin to provide funding for their own operations, then they need to go. The US has become their funding for anything they choose to do and America is fed up paying for their nonsense. We either need to have more control over what they choose to do or they need to get other countries to pay for it!
Yes, but reduce our funding, and remove all special considerations given to all foreign visitors regardless of their country or their rank within it, when in U.S. soil. This includes parking of vehicles in New York, hotel accommodations, etc.
Yes, but ensure that we leverage our funding to ensure that the UN doesn’t reward countries for not committing to UN standars. Human right violators for instance shouldn’t sit on the UN human rights body. It has To improve its metrics for criteria
Yes/No, (No) In my opinion, I despise the UN because the want peace, but they aren't giving us peace. If they wanted peace then they wouldn't have a military.
(Yes) since the UN was made in America, if we took the UN away then we would take away a big part of America.
The historical activity of users engaging with this question.