Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
No, the United Nations cannot represent the interests of the world because rather than giving each country a fair vote, it is ran by the superpowers, who disagree on everything so nothing is passed through.
@9V3B8ZJ8mos8MO
No. One organization is one. Not many. Everyone differs.
@9V38W928mos8MO
I'm not sure but having a space where all countries can come together and discuss world views and issues would be good
@9TD6HLY 8mos8MO
not really every country has their own beliefs and values
@92NYS4X 7mos7MO
not in its current state. and in its inception i think it was built to give cover to former colonial powers and prevent the rise of new ones that aren't supported by the current leading world powers. the idea is nice but the execution is western centric.
@9V7Q7QR7mos7MO
No too many needs and wants that stem from every different nation and that one nation could just choose what's best for them instead of helping the nations it's representing.
@9V7PC6R7mos7MO
No, it would be bad if there was since they would stick to their own interests and there would be no one to oppose them effectively
@9V7P6HF7mos7MO
No, whether it’s a vote system or not, not everyone is going agree on one thing
@9V7KT2R7mos7MO
No. Most countries are different and operates in different ways so that wouldn't work. Religion plays a big part on how countries view the right of free religious expression/choice without it being force on each other.
@9V5YN948mos8MO
I don't think so, all countries are different and operates in different ways so that wouldn't work.
@9V5XTSMLibertarian 8mos8MO
No, but federalism on a bigger scale can be better.
@9V4JTP48mos8MO
No, every country has different problems and no one thing can make every country happy.
@9V4JKTP 8mos8MO
yes, depending on how big the organization like the UNEP is a big organiztion that helps all the waters of the united nations.When coming to smallers groups I don't think it would make big impact of short period time.
@9V493GS 8mos8MO
Yes, they can because they are comprised of every opinion of the countries involved, and also have better cohesion and avoid conflict.
@9V3KRKRPeace and Freedom8mos8MO
no. To many complexities between the many different countries.
@9V3NBZ48mos8MO
I dont think so because everyone's wants and needs are different and they cannot account fro everyone no matter how hard they try
@9V3MMBJ8mos8MO
I do not believe that this is possible, because other nations have other ideas, and no matter what, you cannot please everyone.
@9V3LXR6 8mos8MO
yes, if the jury is large enough and have conflicted views but can talk about it
@9V3LMQ58mos8MO
No, the world is too diverse so someone would be misrepresented somehow somewhere
@9V3LLS68mos8MO
Sure man but we probably are gonna have to really ponder the best way to do it.
@9V3LCCM8mos8MO
I believe that it is possible to represent all countries, if all participating countries are willing to compromise. The only reason that the U.S.'s constitution was formed was that the founding fathers could come to a compromise. No one will ever be fully satisfied, and that is a good thing.
No, the United Nations cannot represent the interests of the world because rather than giving each country a fair vote, it is ran by the superpowers, who disagree on everything so nothing is passed through.
@9V39XCJRepublican8mos8MO
No, there is to many different views for them to represent all of them.
@9V3BLGB8mos8MO
If every country is fairly given representation, the UN is the best system we have to represent the countries of the world, although it is often not as effective as I believe it should be.
No, Each country has different interests that should be personalized to them
@9V39GRB8mos8MO
No, but I believe it is useful to promote dialogue
@9TRNNP98mos8MO
Not really because every country has their one liking and rules and how it already was
@9V7NYL2Women’s Equality7mos7MO
Yes, I think they can represent the majority and at least take into consideration the minority.
No, because there will always be people who oppose your views and trying to unify everyone under one banner is a fool’s errand.
@9V6DV6Y7mos7MO
other countrys need to pay more not just the u.s contributing with each other
@9V5JZN3Republican7mos7MO
Represent the interest of every country? No. However, they can represent the majority while hearing out the minority.
@9V64YLP7mos7MO
I don't think so. Even if countries create these bonds with each other, there will always be differing opinions.
@9V62KCM8mos8MO
I don't think it can represent every country's interests, but I believe it can represent the majority.
@9V634M2Independent8mos8MO
It can when we're working together and showing that we care about others.
@9V3KZQP 8mos8MO
Yes if all countries have representation in the UN
@9V3M85F8mos8MO
The United Nations is our best option for effectively representation the world, but we need a new system of voting that better represents all people, not just economic powerhouses.
@9V3M2LX8mos8MO
No, the United Nations cannot represent the interests of the world because rather than giving each country a fair vote, it is ran by the superpowers
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
