Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

Expert Pundits

These active users have achieved advanced knowledge of the terminology, history, and legal implications regarding the topic of Abortion

Informed Voters

These active users have achieved an understanding of common concepts and the history regarding the topic of Abortion

86813 Replies

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...14yrs14Y

Pro-choice

 Removed by authordisagreed…2yrs2Y

Top Disagreement

It isn't a woman's sole choice to make as the child in her womb is a separate life, a separate person, with distinct DNA and everything. In no circumstance would we approve of killing children outside the womb, inside the womb is no different.

 @9G9MS7B from Indiana  agreed…2yrs2Y

I agree. Biology tells us that life starts at the moment of conception so when the sperm fertilized the egg, a new human being is formed and should be protected. Exceptions to abortion are miscarriages, rape, incest, and If it endangers the life of a mother. If none of those apply there are millions of couples in the USA on waitlists to adopt a child because they’re infertile.

 @9T5NK7CDemocrat from Kansas  disagreed…1yr1Y

Pro-choice

Life does not start at the moment of conception. Stop using the bible as your evidence. The bible is a religious book not a scientific testbook.

 @9X3C4VF from New Jersey  commented…11mos11MO

Pro-choice, and providing birth control, sex education, and more social services will help reduce the number of abortions

Engaged Social Issues

Yes, religion should be separate from government. Religious books should absolutely not be used as evidence. I respect all religions and religious books by the way.

 @B5FVW3D  from Wisconsin  disagreed…5mos5MO

No one is saying that life starts at the moment of conception. A child gets a heartbeat at 5-6 weeks in the womb. On average, women get abortions when they are 2 1/2 months along.

 @9TC4KHH from Nebraska  commented…1yr1Y

 @9X44PM2Republican from Wisconsin  disagreed…11mos11MO

Of course it's not life at conception to those who look at babies in the womb as property and inconvenient rather than humans.

 @ClamNora from New Jersey  disagreed…2yrs2Y

This is because up to 50% of all fertilized eggs spontaneously abort, often before the woman knows she's pregnant. Is this considered a life lost?

Also, while adoption is indeed a noble path, it's important to consider the reality of the system. There are currently over 400,000 children in foster care in the USA, with a third eligible for adoption. Yet, most prospective parents prefer to adopt babies, leaving older children and teenagers in the system. This suggests that the adoption system has its challenges and isn't a simple solution to unwanted pregnancies.

I'd be interested to hear your thoughts on these points. Do you think defining the exact moment life begins is straightforward? And how can we improve the adoption system to better accommodate these children?

 @C0mfyclouds  from Virginia  disagreed…1yr1Y

a spontaneous abortion is another way of saying miscarriage… which is entirely different than purposefully taking the life of another human. Most miscarriages are wanted pregnancies and no one goes out of their way to induce them (hence why they are considered spontaneous) but yes this is a life lost 😔. (I mean woman who’ve had miscarriages sure believe so…) Just because someone doesn’t know they are pregnant or want to be pregnant doesn’t automatically deem that life illegitimate.

Rather than sacrifice a life (that isn’t your right to sacrifice) because a system is shot, let’s focus all this attention, as woman, on restoring this system to benefit, not only aborted potentials, but the many other children displaced for various reasons.

 @9XM82WF from Nebraska  disagreed…11mos11MO

Pro-choice, I don’t agree but the government has no right to ban it

Engaged Social Issues

What about the 5-13 year olds or older who get raped? Are they just forced to carry a baby that they didn't want and possibly get scared for life? Giving birth is a scary thing and it should not be considered lightly. It is dangerous, not only for the mother, but for the baby too. What if the baby miscarries? Do we just let the mother die? What if it gets fertilized in your fallopian tube? You will die, your baby will die. There is no maybe or what if, you both will die, you might as well save yourself and try again. People who get abortions often want them for medical reasons and are so distraught that it can be hard to try again, or try at anything ever again. So no, abortion is not some evil thing that is black or white, it is a very grey thing that still needs debated.

 @9TC4KHH from Nebraska  commented…1yr1Y

Engaged Abortion

Too late! They are so messed up that there’s no fixing them is very difficult and nobody wants to deal with this. This happens because their birth families will not let go and that is what is sad. Do not blame this on the people that want to do good, it’s not their fault the fact that their moms, single moms get paid for them, which helps support their lifestyle or pay for the children. They already have other baby daddy‘s.. They don’t give a **** about their kids. They just give a **** about what the kids can get them. My birth mom had two children already. She…  Read more

 @9SXH6DP from Ohio  commented…1yr1Y

Pro-life, but allow in cases of rape, incest, or danger to the mother or child

We have to get the kids out of foster homes and adopted much earlier. States have gotten kickbacks for numbers of kids in foster. Bionparents should get no more than 1 year to straighten up. After that rights get termed and adoption can take place. We basically have kids that are lifers in the foster system due to being slow to term parental rights.

 @Bi11R1ghtsPigletGreen from New Jersey  disagreed…2yrs2Y

While it's true that a unique set of DNA is formed at conception, it's important to note that biological life and personhood are not synonymous. There are different philosophical, religious, and cultural beliefs about when personhood begins.

As for adoption, it's indeed a beautiful thing, but it's not a simple alternative to pregnancy. Pregnancy and childbirth have profound physical and psychological impacts on a woman's body, and no one should be forced to go through them unwillingly.

 @C0mfyclouds  from Virginia  disagreed…1yr1Y

but “personhood” is developed, developed overtime. It can even change. A baby doesn’t have the same rationality as an adult, does that make the baby less of a person. It does us no good when we try to prescribe personhood to individuals because once it becomes subjective, and we have seen that mistake all throughout history, we start to discriminate against race, gender, babies, heck even the disabled. Ironically Margaret Sanger (a known eugenist, racist and founder of planned parenthood) believed the very thing you said. See how that mindset (of prescribing “personhoo…  Read more

 @9H4DL4B from Washington  agreed…2yrs2Y

I mostly agree with this position. However, I would like to say that incest shouldn't be an exception; most of the time, the incest exception is there as a result of concerns about genetic defects in the child. Disability shouldn't take away your right to life.

Moreso, I've seen some testimonies from medical professionals that abortion is almost never required to save the mother's life. I don't know this for sure, though, so I would look into that yourself for more detail. Just a thought I've had.

 @9SXH6DP from Ohio  commented…1yr1Y

Pro-life, but allow in cases of rape, incest, or danger to the mother or child

Tubal pregnancy is pretty common actually.

 @B52X97V from Texas  commented…5mos5MO

Pro-life, and I also oppose abortion for victims of rape and incest

Yes, abortion is almost never required. But about the incest thing, we all have inalienable, God-given right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. This does not depend upon one's parents or one's genetic defects. Also, killing the genetically inferior was the entire premise of Nazi eugenics.

Abortion is murder. Honor life.

 @9TC4KHH from Nebraska  commented…1yr1Y

Engaged Abortion

I agree with everything you say, but the sad thing is if somebody is in relationship with their father brother anything like that the family will not let anything change. We are not protecting these children. These people will never have abortions because they are not allowed to.

 @9FCBW4C from California  disagreed…2yrs2Y

Abortion does not equal killing children. When a women decides to treat her own body and get an abortion, she is preventing the embryo from forming into a child, meaning that there is no baby yet and it is not murdering anyone. A women should be allowed to make her own choices and if she feels that the baby would not have a good life at that point in time then she may choose to rightfully terminate her pregnancy.

 @C0mfyclouds  from Virginia  disagreed…1yr1Y

What? an embryo is literally a baby in the early stages of development. It only takes a simple google search to figure that out. But forget about the baby being in the mother, you literally just rationalized dissent and human sacrifice simply because someone deemed that life not fit (“the baby would not have a good life”? what’s a good life? who has a good life? and how do you determine if that life is good enough to live?). See how that makes no sense? It’s not a “woman’s choice” to kill another life. Period.

 @AffectedBoarsfrom Maine  disagreed…2yrs2Y

Indeed, the topic of when life begins is a central point in this debate. While some argue that life begins at conception, owing to the distinct DNA and potential for development, others assert that life starts at a later stage when the fetus can survive outside the womb.

Consider this, if we discovered a single-celled organism on Mars, wouldn't we proclaim we've found life? Yet, when it comes to a zygote, a multi-cellular organism in the womb with unique human DNA, why do we deny its life status?

Furthermore, the argument that women should have a choice is definitely valid. However,…  Read more

 @9SXH6DP from Ohio  commented…1yr1Y

Pro-life, but allow in cases of rape, incest, or danger to the mother or child

And, not only that, if we are saying there isn’t a good reason for continuing life if it isn’t going to be a good life, does that mean you want to term the elderly, the poor, the disabled too? Who is deciding what a good life is? This argument seems crazy to me. Every life has its place in the scheme of things. Who are we, mere humans, to decide these things?

  @Patriot-#1776Constitution from Washington  disagreed…1yr1Y

Pro-life, and I also oppose abortion for victims of rape and incest

Engaged Abortion

You're reasoning in a circle. Your argument for the morality of abortion assumes the morality of abortion – otherwise it's completely incoherent. Rather than defend the ideas that

(1) Abortion has to do with a woman's body, not the aborted baby's body, and

(2) An "embryo" is not a child

You assume the anti-life position in order to argue for it. This entire argument is irrational.

  @HelcovichEmireRepublican from Maryland  commented…6mos6MO

Pro-life, but allow in cases of rape, incest, or danger to the mother or child

I have question for you. You said you oppose abortions even for rape and incest, but you also appose letting gay couples adopt children even if no straight couple adopts the child. First of all, no one is going to want to adopt a child of incest, so by not allowing an abortion you are forcing them to suffer by living in a foster home on top of the already severe issues from incest. That is arguably more inhumane than abortion, I don't equate abortion to murder, I equate it more as an extreme form of birth control. By not allowing abortion for these messed up children, the foster homes…  Read more

 @9P2VH7S from Arkansas  disagreed…1yr1Y

Pro-life, but allow in cases of rape, incest, or danger to the mother or child

Do your research. It depends on how far along the woman is. Sometimes they kill it after it's developed. It's not always just an embryo.

 @9FT2ZWJ from Florida  agreed…2yrs2Y

Yes I agree. But abortions should still be available to the public because sometimes there will be certain situations like rape, incest and child pregnancies. Abortions shouldn’t be glorified though as I see it as something that no one should be proud of. But yes abortions should be allowed.

 @9FD8LFLDemocrat from Virginia  disagreed…2yrs2Y

A major party of the woman's life, she will have the child under her responsibility. if she thinks that she is not able to give to this baby a great life, its better for her to abort.

 @L3ftyCodyRepublican from Texas  disagreed…2yrs2Y

I understand where you're coming from, but consider this: adoption. There are many loving families who are unable to have children of their own and are waiting for the opportunity to adopt. If a woman feels she cannot provide a good life for her child, adoption offers another option. What are your thoughts on this as an alternative to abortion?

 @9X3C4VF  from New Jersey  commented…11mos11MO

Pro-choice, and providing birth control, sex education, and more social services will help reduce the number of abortions

Engaged Social Issues

You have to think about what the birthing person has to go through. They have to deal with an extreme amount of pain, spend a lot of money, spend a lot of time, their body changes, and more! It's not that easy. Also right now, adoption is not the best in America. A lot of people actually don't get adopted and some even commit suicide.

 @LehiMello  from Utah  commented…1yr1Y

This sounds like a great way of both sides winning, the child will live, and the mother won't be the one taking care of them

 @9XWGK9W from California  disagreed…11mos11MO

Pro-choice, and providing birth control, sex education, and more social services will help reduce the number of abortions

Engaged Abortion

adoption. There are many loving families who are unable to have children of their own and are waiting for the opportunity to adopt. If a woman feels she cannot provide a good life for her child, adoption offers another option.

Oh, adoptions why don't we talk about that, A large percentage of girls who are in foster care are sexually assaulted or harassed, either by other women in foster care or men, being put in a strange adult's home and potentially being abused. There are loving people who want to adopt children and there are sick demented people out there who beat and will touch on kids that are not their own, especially a vulnerable child with no parents, the majority of girls who get pregnant by 16, its likely by an older man, and where does that bring us back to? Abortions, rape, incest, and guess what. Child pregnancies.

  @Patriot-#1776Constitution from Washington  disagreed…1yr1Y

Pro-life, and I also oppose abortion for victims of rape and incest

Engaged Abortion

Then what about all the homeless drug addicts in Portland, Seattle, LA, New York, and Atlanta? They don't have "great lives" so is it fine to murder them? If you had any logical consistency on this issue, you'd have to argue for that.

 @9HGMXYXIndependent from Illinois  commented…2yrs2Y

Yeah i agree because if the father finna dip why we gotta take care of the baby WE DIDNT WANT...not only that but if the child is going to have a trumatic life why bring a baby into this world.

 @9G2MC2PRepublican  from Arkansas  disagreed…2yrs2Y

Everyone has the right to live, even an unborn baby. Just because of whatever decisions the father or mother made does not justify the death of the child.

 @9G2W76P  from Oregon  agreed…2yrs2Y

Yes! I agree, punish the rapist not the baby. Parents dont have a right to dictate the life of another individual. Even if they are in their womb.

  @9CJ6CB6 from Virginia  commented…2yrs2Y

Pro-choice, and providing birth control, sex education, and more social services will help reduce the number of abortions

I know people who would've been killed by their abusive spouses if they still had any remaining link to them, I know that they had no other viable option other than abortion to prevent from being abused, and that they would only ever be away from that spouse if they didn't have the kid. There are THOUSANDS of reasons people have them, and that is their right to choose. We do not force people to donate organs because it'll save a life, same way as we don't force people to give birth.

  @Patriot-#1776Constitution from Washington  commented…2yrs2Y

Pro-life, and I also oppose abortion for victims of rape and incest

Engaged Abortion

You would then punish a child for the mistakes of other people – punish with DEATH, DEATH! In what world is that right? The child did nothing wrong, the child's not even old enough to think of sinning! Two wrongs don't make a right. once you're a mother you're a mother forever.

  @GloopdevIndependent from Massachusetts  commented…1yr1Y

Pro-life, but allow in cases of rape, incest, or danger to the mother or child Pro-life, and I also oppose abortion for victims of rape and incest

You know people who MAY have been killed by their abusive spouses. The risk of danger does not give you the right to dismember an innocent party. Also, if there is such a serious issue regarding the safety of the mother, the problem is not the baby. Sacificing innocent lives because of a poor abuse support system is not acceptable in any way, and there are many other ways to deal with such a situation. There may be thousands of reasons to have an abortion, but they are actually just thousands of bad reasons. These reasons always boil down to "I don't see this life as worthy of existing therefore I will kill it".

 @9HGMXYXIndependent from Illinois  disagreed…2yrs2Y

 @9G53LFT from Virginia  agreed…2yrs2Y

I'm conflicted. I agree but at the same time things can happen: rape, sexual abuse/assault, incest, not being able to even afford the child. These things happen and while in some cases abortion shouldn't be legal, in other cases it should not be. In some cases, why put yourself and the child through the pain and struggles then you both go through it? In others you're being selfish and irresponsible, you're taking the life of your child because of your mistakes. I honestly think abortion should be legal.

  @Patriot-#1776Constitution from Washington  commented…2yrs2Y

Pro-life, and I also oppose abortion for victims of rape and incest

Engaged Abortion

In cases of rape, sexual abuse/assault, incest, and unaffordability the child is just as human as he/she would otherwise have been. D-mn the circumstances, it's a human being, do not murder it.

 @9KTPRPNLibertarian from Missouri  disagreed…2yrs2Y

Pro-choice

Children that are products of incest do not have a good quality of life. They have increased genetic disorders, fluctuating facial asymmetry, lower birth weight, and higher infant mortality and child mortality rates. Not to mention, 95-97% of children that were conceived because of incest report to being sexually abused as small children. I will and would always abort a child if I was raped by my father or brother. You have absolutely no say in what I do with my body, as a man.

  @Lancia-Delta-S4  from Tennessee  disagreed…6mos6MO

not being able to even afford the child.

This is nowhere near as awful as r_pe, incest, and assault. You people act like adoption is impossible and difficult.

 @9G3L78W from Pennsylvania  agreed…2yrs2Y

Yes, I believe that every baby should have the right to live a life. if the mother or father is not ready for that then they can put the child up for adoption and have another capable family take care of it.

 @9X3C4VF  from New Jersey  commented…11mos11MO

Pro-choice, and providing birth control, sex education, and more social services will help reduce the number of abortions

Engaged Social Issues

In most abortion cases the man and women did not plan to have a baby.

 @9S4FNB6Republican from Arkansas  commented…1yr1Y

I agree with you 100% I've always brought that opinion up. Another thing i always said is be more responsible if you don't want to have a baby, theres protection, birth control or have your tubes tied until your ready.

 @9G66DB8 from Texas  agreed…2yrs2Y

I disagree, because most women who would wan't an abortion have probably wen't through something traumatic like rape or etc.

  @Charlotte-yeeDemocrat from Pennsylvania  agreed…2mos2MO

Top Agreement

It’s the woman who has the baby inside of her, therefore it’s the woman’s body and it’s her choice not anyone else’s

 @B5MBP7B  from MP  commented…1mo1MO

Pro-life

Engaged Abortion

The moment you become a parent, half of your body no longer belongs to you, but to your child. If couple do not want to make baby or do not want to care baby, they should not sleep in the same bed.

 @B5MBP7B  from MP  disagreed…2mos2MO

Pro-life

Engaged Abortion

If couple do not want to make baby or do not want to care baby, they should not sleep in the same bed.

 @9F8FKJ2Republican  from Virginia  disagreed…2mos2MO

Then that's such a privilege to have a beautiful baby that can do so much stuff in the world why KILL that beautiful baby why if murder is illegal then abortion should be illegal

 @9GMWPQD  from California  agreed…2yrs2Y

people should be able to do whatever they want with their body not have it decided by anyone else that is their own choice. Some people also get into situations that are not their fault like rape and they shouldn't be forced to keep that baby if they dont want to that wasn't their fault and wouldn't have the proper mental health in that moment either to raise a child, people should just respect peoples choices cause at the end of the day the person getting the abortion knows whats best for them and that child.

 @9GMXXKG  from Minnesota  disagreed…2yrs2Y

So you can't smoke a cigarette in a hospital for the same reason you can't punch people. Your right to swing your fist ends at someone's face. Rape and incest make up less than 1% of abortion so to use such a small portion to justify that 99% is illogical. Science also teaches us that things are alive, dead, or will never be alive. If the baby isn't alive, it's dead or it's nonliving. It's the same species as us just at a different stage, and a newborn isn't able to sustain its own life and neither is a two year old or a ninety nine year old. I agree…  Read more

 @9GP35TZRepublican from Indiana  disagreed…2yrs2Y

No abortion is not best for the child. In no logical way is killing the child best for them. There are many other options if you are not in a place to raise the child.

 @9GPBZZ2 from Ohio  disagreed…2yrs2Y

It is the responsiility of both parents if they didnt want a baby there are plenty of things to avaoid that besides abortion. If rape occurs it doesnt hurt to just put the aby up for adoption. there is no need for abortion ever

  @VulcanMan6  from Kansas  disagreed…2yrs2Y

Pro-choice, and providing birth control, sex education, and more social services will help reduce the number of abortions

Your argument doesn't do anything to counter theirs. Unless you are going to claim that people do not have the right to make decisions over their own bodies, then your sense of "responsibility" is irrelevant. Whether you think they should or should not get an abortion doesn't matter, because you don't have a say in what they can decide happens to their body.

  @Patriot-#1776Constitution from Washington  disagreed…1yr1Y

Pro-life, and I also oppose abortion for victims of rape and incest

Engaged Abortion

For the trillionth time, it's not about the woman's body, is about the baby's body (the baby, you know, that you think should be torn LIMB FROM LIMB)

 @9GMZZXZ from Texas  disagreed…2yrs2Y

people who are impregnated by rape should be offered free delivery fees to keep people from aborting babies. The baby is still a human regardless if it is 2 weeks old or 6 months old.

  @Patriot-#1776Constitution from Washington  agreed…2yrs2Y

Pro-life, and I also oppose abortion for victims of rape and incest

Engaged Abortion

The baby is a human from the point of conception

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...14yrs14Y

Pro-life

 @B7BVN7Y  from Texas  agreed…2wks2W

Top Agreement

If you don't want a baby, then don't have sex, simple as that. Sex is not a requirement to survive. When you play certain games, you win certain prizes. The baby should not have to die due to the mother's poor decisions, for if a baby is killed in a stroller, it's murder, but if it's terminated in the womb, it's just normalized???

 @B7FKV87 from Virginia  disagreed…1wk1W

Not every women chooses to have sex. Thousands, probably more, have been sexually assaulted by men and left with a pregnancy they don't want. So, in the logic of: "if you don't want a baby, then don't have sex", if you are against abortion, don't impregnate people that don't want to be impregnated. Onto the baby in the stroller argument. A baby in a stroller is WILDLY different then a fetus in the womb. The baby in the stroller has life, a growing conscience, and emotions. The fetus in the womb does not. It is a group of cells at most, none of which have a…  Read more

 @B7BVN7Y  from Texas  disagreed…1wk1W

Onto the baby in the stroller argument. A baby in a stroller is WILDLY different then a fetus in the womb. The baby in the stroller has life, a growing conscience, and emotions. The fetus in the womb does not. It is a group of cells at most, none of which have a conscience or emotions. Cells die constantly. So, if you don't want to kill the group of cells you are claiming to be a whole baby, then you shouldn't clean yourself. Showers, brushing teeth, washing hands, etc. all kill cells. You can argue that those are two different things, but then again, you said a baby in the womb is the same as a baby in the stroller

Biology has literally told us that life starts at the moment of conception so when the sperm fertilized the egg, a new human being is formed and should be protected as for your argument on conscience and emotions what about pre natal babies? should they also be terminated? I mean technically it wasn't supposed to be on its own yet so why not end the suffering? because in true reality we know that taking another human beings life without their consent/choice is wrong. As for your whole arguement of cells on your body, given the same time as a child or not it will die out on its own regard…  Read more

 @B7C89MZ from California  disagreed…2wks2W

Think about your own young daughter getting raped, would you want her to continue to have that child? There are many positions where a woman can be impregnated against her will or in a regretful way, I feel it's their own personal body, they choose what happens to them.

 @B7C9L6P from California  disagreed…2wks2W

If it's the first 3 months, the "baby" would be just a fetus. Fetuses are not conscious, nor should it be anyone's business if the person decides to take the pregnancy off if it happens to be accidental or a result of rape.

 @B7C8HTG from South Carolina  disagreed…2wks2W

Abortions aren’t always the result of a “poor choice” and the time spent arguing over whether the reason matters completely ignores the wishes of the woman whose body people are trying to control. Rape happens, defects happen, lifestyle status change happens, it’s not just poor decisions.

 @B7CFB9P  from California  agreed…2wks2W

Jeremiah 1:5 says, "Before I formed you in the womb I knew you, before you were born I set you apart: I appointed you as a prophet to the nations." This shows that even before a human being is born that God recognizes Jeremiah, even claiming to knowing him before he was ever born. This logic can be applied to all human lives. According to the source, American College of Pediatricians, "The American College of Pediatricians states that human life begins at conception, specifically when sperm and egg membranes fuse to create a zygote." This clearly states that human life…  Read more

 @B7CS6XT from Idaho  disagreed…2wks2W

The Bible should not be used on moral issues as the person who wrote this epithet most likely wore clothes of two different threads, and most likely buys food from farmers that cultivate different crops side by side, both of which are large moral dilemmas in the bible, life begins when consciousness and a heartbeat is there, before then it is the mothers choice.

 @B7CLXD6Women’s Equality from Texas  disagreed…2wks2W

I agree that the life may start at conception, but i disagree that it counts as murder. Typically abortions are performed before the three week mark and at this time it merely a clump of cells with no thoughts, feeling, limbs, or face. It may be living but if anything it is a parasite not a life. I don't agree that women should have abortions willy nilly but when the baby is unwanted, because of rape, or at the age of around 18, it is better for the mom and the baby for the mom to have an abortion. Most likley that baby will go through home to home through foster care or will experience the neglect and unwanted feelings from the mother. In conclusion I think Abortion should be legal forr the benfiet of the mother and the future child.

 @B7CHMKL from Pennsylvania  disagreed…2wks2W

We are not a theocracy, if you are a christian and believe this do not get an abortion, but everyone is not christian.

 @B7CV5C9 from Nevada  disagreed…2wks2W

I believe it should be the choice of the female carrying the child. While murder is immoral, it does not trump that women should have a choice over what happens to their bodies. If a child is unwanted for good reason it can be life-changing and so it should be up to the female to make a decision based on what happens after the fact. No one should be in charge of making these decisions for someone elses life other than the person it is mainly affecting.

 @B789VP3  from Virginia  agreed…3wks3W

The book of Psalms says that God formed our innermost parts in our mothers' wombs, and that he knew every hair on our head.

 @B78GLRJ from Massachusetts  disagreed…3wks3W

In my opinion, the religious belief of one group of people shouldn't affect the choice of everyone, meaning that because one group of people believes that abortion isn't what God wanted doesn't mean that should determine what a mass amount of women should do with their bodies.

 @B78G3WR from Massachusetts  disagreed…3wks3W

the personal beliefs of a group of people should not impact the laws that we are governed by, if they choose to abide by such beliefs then that is there choice that they should make for themselves and not be pushed onto others.

 @B78G65F from Arkansas  disagreed…3wks3W

I believe religion shouldn't be used to deny basic healthcare, especially if that person is not religious or from the same religion.

 @B78G8R8 from California  disagreed…3wks3W

Separation of church and state. If your religion says not to get an abortion, then don't, but the government shouldn't base laws on what a religion says.

 @B7HTT2J  from Maine  agreed…6 days6D

Every human on this planet all started out the same way so how is that babies right any different from our own?

 @B7JZR6P from Maryland  disagreed…4 days4D

We as a society should not choose the right for a woman to get an abortion. They are their own people and if they want to get rid of a bundle of cells, let them.

 @B7LQMPQ from Colorado  disagreed…1 day1D

your body your choice. you shouldn’t have a say on my body when i definitely don’t have a say on yours the baby being aborted would have no impact on your life i promise

 @B7K3LNR from Indiana  disagreed…4 days4D

If you get pregnant and immediately terminate you are terminating basically a clump of cells that hasn't even become a full on baby and it should always be the pregnant mothers choice. idk

 @B7M62BB from Virginia  disagreed…13hrs13H

If the baby has no consciousness or sentience, say in its embryonic stages, does it truly have rights? I don't agree with later abortions where the baby is conscious, but if you find out you are pregnant in the very, very early stages of pregnancy, then abortion should be allowed.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...14yrs14Y

Pro-choice, and providing birth control, sex education, and more social services will help reduce the number of abortions

 @9GN9LV2 from Maine  disagreed…2yrs2Y

Top Disagreement

I am against abortion because I believe that all humans should have human rights. An unborn baby is without a doubt a human being.

 @9GTHJGKSocialist from Maryland  agreed…2yrs2Y

I do not agree with this comment because, though I do believe fetuses are humans and deserve human rights, their human rights do not stump the rights of the breathing person that’s already lived a life.

 @9GN9LV2 from Maine  disagreed…2yrs2Y

When a child or a teenager dies, people often think it's very tragic because they had their whole life in front of them. It wouldn't be as tragic if an old person died, because they had already lived a life. According to your argument, it would be more tragic if an old person died than if a young person died because the old person has already lived a life, which doesn't make any sense. If you were forced to choose between ending the life of an old person vs ending the life of a child, it would be more ethical to kill the old person who has already lived their life. An unborn child literally has their whole life in front of them, so killing them would be the least ethical thing you can do.

 @9GYLPRMPeace and Freedom from Idaho  agreed…2yrs2Y

I agree but also disagree. If someone were to be assaulted and then have a baby, they wouldn't take care of it. It would be a gross reminder of what happened to her. If someone waits after three months to abort it, though, they shouldn't. be allowed.

 @9GNC7MF from Nevada  agreed…2yrs2Y

I agree with having Abortion, because what if a woman got raped and she doesn't want the baby no more. It is her choice to make that

 @9GNC487 from Minnesota  agreed…2yrs2Y

I agree with that statement to a point. What is the mother's life or wellbeing is at risk because of this pregnancy? Is is fair for this child to live if their parents won't be able to provide for them?

 @B78249J  from Florida  disagreed…3wks3W

You are ending the life of someone who never even had a start. You could never even know if the child was going to be someone who could possibly change the very existence of our world but we will now never know because the mother killed them when they were concepted.

 @B7DG4N5 from New York  agreed…2wks2W

I disagree with this statement. Shure you could be killing a life that could do great but if the child is born because of non-consensual acts then the mother could have trouble supporting the child or loving it which could lead to a poor child hood causing development issues in later stages of life causing the adult version of the child to be a worse person and not contribute or even harm our world more than it is are ready.

 @B7857HC from Texas  agreed…3wks3W

i am for this but what if it was killing the mom before it was even born i do know that its bad to kill them but if there both going to die whats the point

 @B79FVGQ from Alabama  agreed…2wks2W

I agree with this stance as abortion is a terrible sight, especially if the person wanted to have a baby. Though, I believe that if the woman did not agree to the pregnancy, they deserve to choose. Whether they keep the baby or have an abortion because they did not want to have a child due to rape or other issues, that choice is up to them.

 @B7BK6JK from Washington  agreed…2wks2W

Focus on caring for the children who are earthside and stop shaming people for their choices with their bodies.

 @63WMKH8Socialist  from Illinois  agreed…3wks3W

if more people had access to preventive healthcare, so they can easily control when they get pregnant, then they will not need an abortion

 @B784YVN from Illinois  disagreed…3wks3W

If more people had access to safety resources before getting pregnant or education, then they will not need all that easy access for healthcare.

 @B78566J from Illinois  disagreed…3wks3W

Preventive healthcare will not help control all pregnancies and those occurring in teens and younger should be prevented on an entirely different level.

 @B7855NKRepublican from South Carolina  disagreed…3wks3W

If they didn't run around having sex with everyone they would know who the dad is or know if there pregnant. If you accidentally make a kid that is your fault now you need to step up. If you want to have sex that's ok but use protection and be prepared if you don't want a kid. I will say there should be a exception for rape victims. Fetal abnormality where the kid will die or be messed up is also a reason to. If the mother will die giving birth then it is her option to abort or not.

 @B784XBNNo Labels from New York  agreed…3wks3W

I agree that there should be more public access to birth control through healthcare, preventing the unwanted pregnancy.

 @9GT4P67Socialist  from Nevada  agreed…2yrs2Y

IT IS NOT YOUR BODY. If it is not your body why should you get any amount of say to what they do to it. The government should not be allowed to dictate what you can & cannot do with your own damn body. This is crazy that it's even an issue.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...