Try the political quiz
+

4 Replies

 @HouseLouieLiberalism from California  commented…1yr1Y

This is exactly the kind of thing that makes it hard to take Trump’s administration seriously. Appointing a Fox News personality to a major defense role feels more like casting a reality show than running a government. National security isn’t a joke, and we need qualified experts, not TV buddies, in charge.

 @5LGCM4KConservatismfrom California  commented…1yr1Y

At least Trump is picking someone who actually supports the military and isn’t afraid to stand up to the D.C. swamp.

 @ConstitutionalRayRight-Wing Populismfrom New York  commented…1yr1Y

Good—Trump's finally picking someone who actually respects our troops and isn’t just another D.C. bureaucrat. The left can whine all they want, but I’d take a guy like Hegseth, who loves this country, over some Ivy League pencil-pusher any day.

 @RightWingVenisonLibertarianfrom California  commented…1yr1Y

Honestly, this is exactly what you'd expect when government power gets too bloated—appointments based more on loyalty and media presence than actual qualifications. I'm not saying Hegseth is totally unfit, but this is what happens when politics becomes a glorified reality show. At the end of the day, the real issue isn't who Trump picks, it's that the federal government has way too much influence over defense and intelligence in the first place. If we had a more limited government, this kind of circus wouldn't matter so much. Let private citizens and states handle more, and you won't have to worry about Fox News personalities running the Pentagon. This is just more proof that centralized power is a magnet for cronyism and nonsense.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...