Try the political quiz
+

Sort by

Filters

Discussions tagged as:

Choose more filters:

Options

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…1hr1H

China Orders Apple to Remove Popular Messaging Apps

  2210 replies

China is the only country that has institutionalized large-scale IP theft under its joint venture system, which is funda…

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…3 days3D

House Republicans Attempt To Oust Leader Over Foreign Aid Bill

  1611 replies

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…12hrs12H

Congress Moves to Force TikTok Sale Amid National Security Concerns

  11replies

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…17hrs17H

Senate Moves Closer to Renewing Controversial Surveillance Law

  10replies

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…2 days2D

Israel’s War Leaders Don’t Trust One Another

  7replies

 @9LNH8P6 from New Jersey answered…42mins42m

No, I wouldn’t assassinate I would interrogate them, but only if they are guaranteed to be terroists and to be apart of…

 @9LNCQHCfrom Maine  answered…7hrs7H

"suspected" if that means not confirmed then what da faq? if confirmed, yea why not idm a few less people :3

 @9LN9XVV from Connecticut answered…10hrs10H

The military should be used in Mexico with the permission of Mexico. The Nationsl Guard of border states need to be fede…

 @9LN9XVV from Connecticut answered…10hrs10H

Yes, but only with a special secret military court similar to FISA with members of Congress to approve.

 @9LN9HLL from Pennsylvania answered…11hrs11H

If we have permission from Mexico to try to stop the cartels then we should put an end to it. Any programs put into moti…

 @9LN9HLL from Pennsylvania answered…11hrs11H

Yes, the president should be required to get approval from congress before making decisions that could impact all of Ame…

 @9LN79RC from California answered…14hrs14H

The president should consult Congress and Congress should vouch for their side but in the end if the president is not sw…

 @9LN69FX from Georgia answered…16hrs16H

Yes, the President should be able to make decisive actions that need urgency, but Congress should be able to limit his p…

 @9LN42YX from California answered…18hrs18H

No, control the illegal gun trade from U.S. to Mexico, decreasing the power of the Mexican Drug Cartels

 @9LN39MG from Indiana answered…18hrs18H

In vital and dangerous instances the president should be able to send military force. However, in unsure times or grey a…

 @9LN2Y9W from Idaho answered…18hrs18H

I have lost faith in our executive branches to make quick, calculated decisions without politicizing them for their own…

 @9LN2N75 from California answered…19hrs19H

no, the United States shouldn't interfere and leave it to the Mexican government but if you capture the drug traffickers…

 @9LN2N75 from California answered…19hrs19H

no, they shouldn't they should leave it to the other country to deal with it but if the terrorist does something within…

 @9LMZD5X from New York answered…19hrs19H

No it is a waste to time and inefficient use of money. Double down on removing demand for illegal drugs and support and…

 @9LMZCZ5 from Arkansas answered…19hrs19H

No the USA government should work with the Mexican government to eliminate the cartels, and instead of taking matters in…

 @9LMY2L6 from Arkansas answered…20hrs20H

I believe that must be only in special, and in no other option, circumstances. However communication between the branche…

 @9LMWQZD from Texas answered…20hrs20H

If its 100% clear that its a threat than yes but if its up in the air then it should involve congress and the people

 @Minarchist-08 from Washington answered…21hrs21H

Libertarian Conservatism. Libertarian Conservatism is based on the principles of individual liberty, free markets, peace,…

 @9LMWH6P from New Jersey answered…21hrs21H

Yes, but only for a limited amount of time. The end of this time is the deadline for Congress to approve or reject addit…