Green spaces in housing developments are areas designated for parks and natural landscapes to enhance residents' quality of life and environmental health. Proponents argue that it enhances community well-being and environmental quality. Opponents argue that it increases the cost of housing and developers should decide the layout of their projects.
74% Yes |
26% No |
74% Yes |
26% No |
See how support for each position on “Green Spaces” has changed over time for 67.8k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Green Spaces” has changed over time for 67.8k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from America users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@clubled 1mo1MO
No, it should not be required but the developers should be given some sort of compensation in the form of money or tax breaks from the city to include green spaces and parks
@9QXJGMZ2wks2W
YES. There is too much concrete and pavement. The country is growing hotter due to this and the country is also becoming very grey.
@9QPSXP73wks3W
Should they have these things? Yes but should they be required? No. They can build however they like
@9MSGYVD2mos2MO
No, deregulate property development and reduce the scope of zoning laws so that developers and local governments can provide these amenities as they are demanded by the consumer.
@9RD959Y4 days4D
We should protect green spaces and parks but housing developments should not be forced to pay to maintain them.
@9RD6W984 days4D
Green space and or some kind or recreational area. Suck as a pool, tennis court or other activity space.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
