Answer Overview

Response rates from 13.8m America voters.

47%
Yes
53%
No
39%
Yes
39%
No
5%
Yes, but increase oversight
7%
No, we should pursue more sustainable energy resources instead
4%
Yes, but not in heavily populated areas
6%
No, more research is needed to measure the long term effects of fracking

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 13.8m America voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 13.8m America voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from America voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @8KZ52SJ from Pennsylvania answered…4yrs4Y

 @8D7X8VB from Pennsylvania answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, apply appropriate oversight, no subsidies, and mandate cost of energy = cost to produce energy + cost to environment/cleanup .

 @8N5DRPD from Texas answered…4yrs4Y

 @98DPQVY from Pennsylvania answered…2yrs2Y

 @9VJZZCG from Maryland answered…1wk1W

Yes, but only for now, not in the long term. We can’t realistically switch to clean energy at the snap of a finger, so we should use it now but gradually decrease it as we taper off fossil fuels in general in favor of green energy.

 @9NBM7CL from California answered…4mos4MO

Yes, oil and gas production is impossible without fracturing the rock formations. Similarly, geothermal absolutely requires 'fracking'.

  @Kindredburke  from Michigan answered…5 days5D

I don't support it, but it's necessary to keep up with our high energy needs and should continue till we switch to nuclear energy.

Latest News

Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Fracking” news articles, updated frequently.