@ISIDEWITHQuestionsHealthcareStarted 11yrs agoActive 3 days ago

Should the government increase funding for mental health research and treatment?

In July 2022 the federal government approved a $21 billion funding package for mental-health and substance-use disorders. The spending package was in response to a jump in substance abuse and a suicide rate that increased 33% from 1999 through 2017, making it the 10th-leading cause of death in the U.S, according to the most recent federal data.

85%
Yes
15%
No
76%
Yes
11%
No
5%
Yes, our mental healthcare system needs more funding to provide a higher quality of care and services
4%
No, incentivize private companies to address this issue instead
5%
Yes, but only increase funding for personalized care instead of subsidizing pharmaceutical companies

Historical Results

See how support for each position on “Mental Health” has changed over time for 710k America voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

See how importance of “Mental Health” has changed over time for 710k America voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from America users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.

 @8JCJLWV from Texas answered…4yrs4Y

Not enough knowledge to make an informed vote

 @9CWJ7N8 from Texas answered…10mos10MO

No and disability diagnosises for most people dont exist and are cop outs

 @8PR4YLZ from California answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, and incentivize private companies to address this issue as well

 @8GCPW72 from Iowa answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but only for research.

 @9GT9D2R from New York answered…6mos6MO

No people need to grow up and stop using mental health as a crutch to get their way and not have to be held to the same standards

 @95XBR46 from Texas answered…2yrs2Y

No, it all turns to corporate BS positivity

Latest News

Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Mental Health” news articles, updated frequently.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…1mo1MO

Florida Bans Residents Under 14 From Holding Social Media Accounts

Florida on Monday became the first state to effectively bar residents under the age of 14 from holding accounts on services like TikTok and Instagram, enacting a strict social media bill that is likely to upend the lives of many young people.The landmark law, signed by Gov. Ron DeSantis, is one of the more restrictive measures that a state has enacted so far in an escalating nationwide push to insulate young people from potential mental health and safety risks on social media platforms. The statute both prohibits certain social networks from giving accounts to children under 14 and requires the services to terminate accounts that a platform knew or believed belonged to underage users.It also requires the platforms to obtain a parent’s permission before giving accounts to 14- and 15-year-olds.In a press conference on Monday, Mr. DeSantis hailed the measure, saying it will help parents navigate “difficult terrain” online. He added that “being buried” in devices all day long was not the best way to grow up.“Social media harms children in a variety of ways,” Mr. DeSantis said in a statement. The new bill “gives parents a greater ability to protect their children”Mr. DeSantis had vetoed a previous bill that would have banned social media accounts for 14- and 15-year-olds even with parental consent. The governor said the earlier bill would impinge on parents’ rights to make decisions about their children’s online activities.The new Florida measure is almost certain to face constitutional challenges over young people’s rights to freely seek information and companies’ rights to distribute information.

▲  611 replies1 agree

Other Popular Questions

Explore other topics that are important to America voters.

 @ISIDEWITH asked…1mo1MO

What is your reaction to a high-profile politician supporting a candidate from a different political party; is it a savv…

In a series of developments that have stirred the political landscape, former President Donald Trump has publicly endorsed the presidential bid of independent candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr., describing it as 'great for MAGA.' Trump's remarks came after Kennedy announced his vice-presidential pick, further intensifying the political discourse. Trump, in his characteristic style, took to social media to express his views, labeling Kennedy as the 'most radical left' candidate in the race and highlighting the liberal credentials of Kennedy's running mate, Nicole Shanahan. Despite his criticism of their political stance, Trump views Kennedy's candidacy as beneficial for his MAGA movement, suggesting it could potentially divide the Democratic vote.Kennedy, a figure who has long been associated with controversial views, particularly on the rule of law and established science, has drawn criticism and concern from various quarters. His decision to run for president and the subsequent endorsement by Trump has sparked a flurry of reactions, with some seeing it as a strategic move that could impact the Democratic Party's chances in the upcoming elections. Allies of President Joe Biden have expressed alarm over Kennedy's bid, fearing it could siphon off crucial votes from the left, thereby posing a significant threat to Biden's reelection efforts.The political dynamics surrounding Kennedy's candidacy and Trump's endorsement underscore the complex and often unpredictable nature of American politics. As the race for the presidency heats up, the strategies employed by candidates and their supporters are coming under increased scrutiny. The potential impact of Kennedy's run on the Democratic vote is a topic of much speculation, with analysts and political observers closely monitoring the situation.Trump's support for Kennedy, despite their ideological differences, highlights the former president's tactical approach to politics. By endorsing a candidate who could potentially weaken his opponents, Trump is playing a strategic game, aiming to maximize his own chances of success. This move has not only added a new dimension to the political landscape but has also raised questions about the future direction of both the Republican and Democratic parties.As the United States gears up for another presidential election, the emergence of candidates like Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and the reactions they provoke from figures like Donald Trump are indicative of the shifting sands of American politics. With the electorate increasingly polarized, the outcome of the election remains uncertain, and the strategies adopted by candidates will be crucial in determining the path forward.

▲  2