Incentives could include financial support or tax breaks for developers to build housing that is affordable for low- and middle-income families. Proponents argue that it increases the supply of affordable housing and addresses housing shortages. Opponents argue that it interferes with the housing market and can be costly for taxpayers.
Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
@9RVQ9KWIndependent2yrs2Y
Housing should already be affordable regardless. There shouldn't be special incentives just to make living affordable,
@9SXVZP4Republican2yrs2Y
Big corporations should be regulated by rules and policies from buying and selling homes, which makes housing more expensive.
@ISIDEWITH2yrs2Y
Have you ever thought about how housing affordability might influence a person’s mental health or well-being?
@9WX25ZD 2yrs2Y
Absolutely. I’m in California and everyone is house poor. It’s very difficult and depressing
@9TRWRGQ 2yrs2Y
Affordable housing would allow families to be able to afford to pay rent without worrying about paying their other bills and not having enough to feed their children. This causes a lot of stress and anxiety on most people and takes a toll on the overall health of a person.
@9TS9HV52yrs2Y
Absolutely. Most young people do not believe they will ever be able to buy a home, they believe they are forced to rent for the foreseeable future. This is incredibly stressful and taxing.
@9XXYWKS1yr1Y
Housing affordability can affect anyone's metal health because of the judgement that comes with it. Ignorant people who are presumptuous make low income families feel less than just because of where they live.
@9L4Z23BIndependent 2yrs2Y
No, local governments and zoning boards should reform zoning laws to allow higher density building and to help construct more housing than there is demand
@B4WBQFWRepublican1yr1Y
No, but ban corporate and foreign investors from purchasing residential real estate
@B33SHXDConstitution1yr1Y
No, ban corporate and foreign investors from purchasing residential real estate and capitalize the industry
@B6GYF989mos9MO
ban corporate and foreign investors from purchasing residential real estate, and the government should get the economy to a point where houses are affordable but doesn't mean built cheap and trashy
Yes, but the government should focus on renovating unused buildings that are currently wasting valuable space in our cities
@9L4Z23BIndependent 2yrs2Y
No, the government should relax zoning laws to encourage increasing housing supply and stabilize rent
@B6YX4HV8mos8MO
No, reform zoning laws and ban corporate and foreign investors from purchasing residential real estate
@9VYDQRC2yrs2Y
Yes, but they should focus first on incentivizing better wages, parental benefits, and healthcare so that more citizens can afford their rent or mortgage without the need for special housing.
@B7SBX53Constitution7mos7MO
No, reform zoning laws to increase housing supply instead and also ban corporate and foreign investors from purchasing residential real estate
@B7HDJF27mos7MO
Yes, housing is a basic right that should be affordable to everyone, and zoning laws should be reformed for more efficient, high-density, mixed-use housing to take priority and be the norm, rather than the exception.
@9TDXT2Y 2yrs2Y
Yes, the government should incentivize the construction of affordable housing to help ensure that everyone has access to safe and affordable living conditions.
@9W6VFM32yrs2Y
The government should incentivize the construction of affordable housing and additionally should build social housing.
@9RPRD7T2yrs2Y
Yes, the government should incentivize the construction of more housing in general, not just affordable housing.
@B8TH53Z5mos5MO
i agree the government should incentivize construction of affordable housing but should also try to make existing housing cheaper as well.
@B7QZL6KIndependent7mos7MO
Yes, and also ban corporate and foreign investors from purchasing residential real estate. Housing is a basic right that should be affordable to anyone.
@B7886RF8mos8MO
yes, and reform zoning laws to increase housing supply, and ban corporate and foreign investors, because housing is a basic right that should be available to everyone
@B6ZDNZV8mos8MO
reform zoning laws to increase housing supply instead and also ban corporate and foreign investors from purchasing residential real estate
@B79BCG37mos7MO
Reform zoning laws, and ban corporate and foreign investors from purchasing residential real estate.
@B6QPP828mos8MO
No, Reform zoning laws to increase housing supply and ban corporate and foreign investors from purchasing residential real estate.
@B3GDS3V1yr1Y
Yes, but lower regulation instead of incentives or any financial assistance unless seen as necessary
@9X4VDKW2yrs2Y
No, this is too broad and these houses can still be overpriced while developers get cuts by writing these houses off as Low Income
@9WDTKJ82yrs2Y
There also needs to be addressing of underlying issues so that it doesn't impact the ability for those to sustain.
@9TT5ZMT2yrs2Y
Yes but the affordable housing should be well-made! People shouldn’t have to be forced to accept sub-standard housing.
@9SZ4ZWS2yrs2Y
Yes, but it should only be used to get oneself on their feet. It should not be used as a permanent residence for the rest of one's life, that is until there is enough to support that.
Yes, but we shouldn’t build too much and destroy nature, build homes in designated areas, and have more protection for nature
@9RSTXRMIndependent 2yrs2Y
Yes, but have better systems of accountability for landlord/tenant laws so those in lower income housing are not exploited by corrupt management or held hostage by predatory leases.
@BD89PLT23hrs23H
Not really, because this will most likely target historically working class neighborhoods, forcing the native residents out. Which can go one or two ways, if modern apartments are built, along with the houses, that’s called gentrification, where a lot of natural land is torn up in the name of ‘progress’. On the other hand, this takes away animal habitats. if it’s the other way around, then it’s called the ‘projects’.
@BD7NNM33 days3D
Yes, but keep in mind of the specific areas so it doesn't disrupt the local spots and ban corporate and foreign investors from pricing people out of their homes
@BD7MRFF3 days3D
No, there will be to costly of taxes
@BD62KVK5 days5D
Local governments should have greater say in housing developments and base home prices on market research in the area as well as the cost of living.
@BD3V6KW1wk1W
Yes, and also reform zoning laws to ban further proliferation of Single-Family "homes"
@BD3GX491wk1W
A combination of the "yes" and "reform zoning laws to increase housing supply" answers.
@BD2T6J9Libertarian1wk1W
No, instead ban corporate and foreign investors from purchasing residential real estate
@BD2R38N 1wk1W
Yes, I believe that everyone who makes at least 5 bucks an hour should be liable to purchase housing(this way, homelessness should only be caused by one's own incompetence.)
@BCZ53NC2wks2W
Maybe instead we can try to make housing more affordable.
@BCYCPSH2wks2W
no just make the houses aready buit affordable rather than building more and leaving others abadoned
@BCXNM4N2wks2W
yes, but you have to be physically working
@BCXJ9WD2wks2W
If they have rules like no drugs and you must have a job.
No, new construction is not always necessary to provide housing to all
@BCRB8LZ 3wks3W
Yes, and reform zoning laws to increase housing supply and ensure mixed-income neighborhoods.
@BCR6DTZ3wks3W
Yes, but also pursue multiple measures.
@BCPQ6RP4wks4W
Yes, and ban foreign investors from trying to purchase the estate for more that it is worth because there are more people who needs that house than they do. And if a rich person tries to buy it to redo it to make the house worth more, they shouldn't be allowed to do that.
@BCPNCB44wks4W
Yes, but put more emphasis on changing zoning laws to allow housing to be built for cheaper.
@BCP476Z4wks4W
Yes, they should reform zoning laws to increase housing supply and also ban corporate investors from purchasing residential real estate.
@BCMRDZ84wks4W
Yes. But redefine what affordable housing is. Normal people cannot afford $500,000 little condos
@BCHXXZM1mo1MO
Gov should work to lower current housing prices before wrecking more land to build more cookie cutter houses.
@BCF5JLVRepublican1mo1MO
Yes but they have to make them cost something they can't just be giving out free housing because people are too lazy to work or spend all their money on drugs
@BC5P5SC 1mo1MO
No, reform and abolish zoning laws to increase housing supply instead, and let state and local governments ban corporate and foreign investors from purchasing residential real estate.
@BC6PTYG2mos2MO
Increase the minimum wage, because it's difficult to afford affordable housing without accounting for inflation. I don't think housing is the root of the problem.
WE should not let private businesses own these places as we have loads of empty homes we should use them.
@BBTMXDZ 2mos2MO
The government should neither subsidize nor discourage the construction of affordable housing, this should be up to the market.
@BBTMS352mos2MO
No, reform zoning laws and ban large corporations like Blackrock from purchasing single family homes.
@BBSNBG52mos2MO
No, they should seize the housing and apartments build that's empty and held by people using it at a financial investment to sell later.
@BBQPFLD2mos2MO
Housing vacancies must be prioritized over housing expansion, which destroys community spaces and natural areas.
Yes, and also reform zoning laws to boost the housing supply and ban corporate and foreign investors from monopolizing residential real estate
@BBGB6F62mos2MO
Encourage zoning reform and reduce regulations rather than heavy federal subsidies. Lower costs by cutting red tape
@BBBPCHC2mos2MO
Yes but ban corporate and foreign investors from purchasing residential real estate instead and prevent people who abuse the system from enrolling.
@BB9JLP2 2mos2MO
Yes, and no corporate/foreign investors and no entity or person should be able to own more than 5 homes or 3 rentals
@BB6YBGM 3mos3MO
Yes, it will stimulate spending on housing and offer construction contracts that will be available to small businesses.
@BB5JWJ33mos3MO
No, reform zoning laws and also ban corporate and foreign investors from purchasing residential real estate
@BB4S7DQRepublican3mos3MO
Yes, provide tax breaks for developers to build affordable housing and also ban corporate and foreign investors from purchasing residential real estate, but don't financially supporting the construction of them as it will cost taxpayers more
@BB42N693mos3MO
The government should build public housing. Affordable housing still includes private interests, who want a profit.
@B9QRTMP3mos3MO
No, they should simply reform the current system and make current housing more affordable and available.
@B9MWTSS3mos3MO
Yes and limit corporate and foreign investors from purchasing residential real estate. Housing should be affordable to anyone.
@B9LV2Y24mos4MO
Yes. housing is a basic right that should be available to everyone, and we should ban corporations and investors from purchasing real estate.
@Hitesh 4mos4MO
Yes. Make sure no drugs are flowing through (enforce that). And also ban corporate and foreign investors from purchasing residential real estate.
@B9JNVXX4mos4MO
Yes and big companies shouldn't be able to buy single family homes that they then rent out for super high monthly payments.
@B9JJGK74mos4MO
Not in the way it is where people are profiting from it and the poor aren't benefiting at all. It can continue, but needs reform.
@B9HB75R4mos4MO
Yes, middle and low income families need a place to live but effort should be put forth from those families to help pay for it not coming out of taxpayers pockets
@B9CKLST4mos4MO
Yes, but those corporate and foreign investors must show a clear stance and plan on what they will do with the estate, rather than be blindly bought to them.
@B97ZJHK 4mos4MO
If people need to be housed, house them. If they don’t want to be housed, make cities livable outside of a house by providing warming huts, access to food, and access to mental health programs. How affordable the housing is doesn’t inherently house people who need housing.
@B968GD74mos4MO
Yes, with quality and aesthetic guidelines and also ban corporate and foreign investors from purchasing residential real estate
@B95TFHY4mos4MO
Yes, and to offset the dangers of higher taxes to the taxpayers, taxes could be increased on businesses, especially those that are environmentally negligent that have dominated rule communities and repurposed residential land for large corporation/facilities.
@aminus57Republican 4mos4MO
YES... The government should incentivize the construction of affordable housing. Providing shelter is a foundational social good, and incentives that expand supply serve justice, stewardship, and human dignity. When designed to increase real housing availability rather than distort markets, such incentives address structural scarcity while preserving lawful commerce and proportional public responsibility.
@B8YCKVS5mos5MO
No, the government should not insert itself into the housing economy. Instead, it should allow for a free market.
@B8Y4XVK5mos5MO
Yes, but have you not been to the projects or the hood? I have. It doesn't work as well in real life as it does not paper, let me tell you that.
@B8XZ8R9 5mos5MO
I think there should be a program for first responders and military veterans, but otherwise everyone is on their own.
@B8XQSQ65mos5MO
Affordable housing in a lot of cases is a scam. But obviously the name sounds good. So I’m open to ideas on home to make living more affordable.
@B8XDT285mos5MO
They need to make programs to help people afford housing and get jobs and if they refuse to get help then they should not get any other assistance
@B8XDRJWIndependent5mos5MO
I don't exactly know how to answer this question. I would like to say that it should be affordable but I'm not the person that would be able to answer this question.
@B8X2FNK5mos5MO
No, we have a inventory overload right now and more coming with each illegal family deported back to where they belong.
@B8VN6DH5mos5MO
Yes, but also incentivize the creation of housing that is designed to be economically, and environmentally friendly, while also being meant to last for hundreds of years. A ban should also be placed on corporate and foreign investors from purchasing residential real estate.
@B8V89QZ5mos5MO
There is no need for the Government to build new houses, what we need to do to prevent big businesses like black rock from buying a bunch of houses and selling them for outrageous prices.
@B8V2XY85mos5MO
Both it could cost to much for taxpayers however the cost of houses is exremely high and almost impossible with todays minimum wage
@B8TXG285mos5MO
The government should be pushing an aggressive anti-natalist policy. This will alleviate the housing crisis, and all the other crises too.
@B8TVP4F5mos5MO
So, my opinion is that we need to make communties closer togehter but more even across the country, i do NOT want to build appartments AT ALL, and I want to destroy old homes and apartmants in place of new, middle class suburbs, I want to make the midwest more populated to generate more GDP, so short answer, yes.
@B8TQ5PS5mos5MO
Yes, but we have enough housing. Take all the empty, unused homes owned by corporations and just give them to homeless people instead.
Yes, but focus more on increasing worker's wages and lowering rent to increase opportunities of affording a home.
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
