Incentives could include financial support or tax breaks for developers to build housing that is affordable for low- and middle-income families. Proponents argue that it increases the supply of affordable housing and addresses housing shortages. Opponents argue that it interferes with the housing market and can be costly for taxpayers.
81% Yes |
19% No |
81% Yes |
19% No |
See how support for each position on “Affordable Housing” has changed over time for 5.6k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Affordable Housing” has changed over time for 5.6k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from America users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@9L4Z23B 2mos2MO
No, local governments and zoning boards should reform zoning laws to allow higher density building and to help construct more housing than there is demand
@8BPDQT2 5 days5D
No, do more to reduce the overall pricing of what is already available and spent more on infrastructure improvements.
@9R9BM595 days5D
Yes, but it must follow a strict list of requirements including green space, natural light, and quality construction.
@9R92PBL5 days5D
Yes, and the standards for who qualifies needs to be expanded to include those who make above the poverty line but still cannot afford necessities
@9R8H8895 days5D
No, we have too many abandoned building as it is. The government should incentivize converting already standing structures to affordable housing.
@9R7PGP76 days6D
Yes, the state/federal government must build affordable, comfortable and safe public housing for every working citizen (like Khrushchyovkas and Brezhnevkas)
Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Affordable Housing” news articles, updated frequently.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
