Try the political quiz

Transhumanist

You believe technology should be used to enhance human intelligence, health, and lifespan far beyond natural limits.

Overview Issues Discuss

Transhumanist policies on education issues

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.

Filters

Topics

Education  ›  Student Loans

Do you support increasing taxes for the rich in order to reduce interest rates for student loans?

T>T  ChatGPTYes, and increase government funding so every student receives a free college education

Education  ›  Abolish Department of Education

Should the U.S. Department of Education be abolished?

T>T  ChatGPTNo, this would decimate funding for special needs and low-income students

Education  ›  Universal Free School Meals

Should the federal government provide free breakfast and lunch to all public school students regardless of income?

T>T  ChatGPTYes, but only if the food meets strict nutritional standards

Education  ›  Free College for All

Should the federal government pay for tuition at four-year colleges and universities?

T>T  ChatGPTYes

Education  ›  School Book Bans

Should public schools be allowed to remove books from libraries if parents find them inappropriate?

T>T  ChatGPTNo, parents can control their own child's reading, but cannot dictate what other students access.

How similar are your political beliefs to Transhumanist issues? Take the political quiz to find out.

Education  ›  Universal Pre-K

Should the federal government fund Universal preschool?

T>T  ChatGPTYes, as long as parents also have the option to send their child to private school

Education  ›  School Vouchers

Should the government offer students a voucher that they can use to attend private schools?

T>T  ChatGPTYes, but only for students with exceptional athletic, academic, or service achievements

Education  ›  Common Core

Do you support Common Core national standards?

T>T  ChatGPTNo, teach to each student's potential instead of uniform testing

Education  ›  Charter Schools

Do you support charter schools?

T>T  ChatGPTYes, but not at the expense of funding public schools

Education  ›  University Debt Accountability

Should colleges be held financially accountable if graduates, with degrees leading to lower income jobs, default on their student loans?

T>T  ChatGPTNo, and higher education should be free for everyone

Education  ›  Ban Legacy Admissions

Should universities be prohibited from giving preference to applicants whose parents are alumni?

T>T  ChatGPTYes, admissions must be based strictly on merit rather than family wealth or lineage

Popular conversations

Join in on the most popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…2yrs2Y

A Moment of Darkness': Washington Post's No-Endorsement Decision Ignites Media Firestorm

Even though the presidential race between former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris is neck and neck, The Washington Post has decided not to make a presidential endorsement for the first time in 36 years, the publisher and CEO announced Friday."We are returning to our roots of not endorsing presidential candidates," Will Lewis wrote in an opinion piece published on the paper's website. He referenced the paper's policy in the decades prior to 1976, when, following the Watergate scandal that the Post broke, it endorsed Democratic nominee Jimmy Carter. The last time the Post did not endorse a presidential candidate in the general election was 1988, according to a search of its archives.Colleagues learned the news from the editorial page editor, David Shipley, at a tense meeting shortly before Lewis' announcement. The meeting was characterized by someone with direct knowledge of discussions on condition of anonymity to speak about internal matters.Shipley said that he told other editorial board leaders Thursday by management that there would be no endorsement, though he has known for weeks. He added that he "owns" this decision. The reason he cited was to create "independent space" where the newspaper does not tell people for whom to vote.Colleagues were said to be "shocked" and uniformly negative. Post corporate spokespeople have not responded to multiple messages left by NPR on the subject.Former Washington Post Executive Editor Martin Baron, who led the newsroom to acclaim during Trump's presidency, denounced the decision starkly."This is cowardice, a moment of darkness that will leave democracy as a casualty," Baron said in a statement to NPR. "Donald Trump will celebrate this as an invitation to further intimidate The Post’s owner, Jeff Bezos (and other media owners). History will mark a disturbing chapter of spinelessness at an institution famed for courage."A similar decision by Los Angeles Times owner Patrick Soon-Shiong led this week to the resignations of the paper's editorials editor and two editorial board members. Soon-Shiong said that he had asked the editorial board to draft a "factual analysis" of Trump and Harris' policies and plans. In her resignation letter, editorials editor Mariel Garza said the decision made the paper look “craven and hypocritical,” given its past reporting and editorials on Trump.

▲  1013 replies