Try the political quiz

1.4k Replies

@ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...9yrs

No, teach to each student's potential instead of uniform testing

@955M75D from New York commented…4wks

Yes, national standards will help improve our national average and better prepare students for college

New movement to do away with standardized testing such as GREs and SATs which are not required for all Ph.D. programs to begin with! However, students and Nations are compared on education measures, such as average age of school completed in the population, and number of STEM (science, technology, math and engineering) graduates or those with advanced degrees. Looking at China and US comparisons yesterday from 1949 to present which of course begin with population literacy, and drive the economies. Julie Ann Racino, ASPA, SSTIG, 2019

@955M75D from New York asked for more information…4wks

Yes, national standards will help improve our national average and better prepare students for college

Studentś potential is also an economic inquiry in which it is often more important to have a credential than to have an A! Today, we have the global initiatives on schooling for girls (in UN Sustainable Development Goals) which our newsmedia indicates is not supported, for example, by the Taliban in Afghanistan. And we conversely have the wealthy who have even dropped out of college to become entrepreneurs; and new fast-tracked skilled trade apprenticeships.

@ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...9yrs

No, education should be handled at the state and local level instead of the national level

@ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...9yrs

@ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...9yrs

Yes, national standards will help improve our national average and better prepare students for college

@ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...9yrs

Yes, I support a national base standard but allow states and local districts to customize their implementation

@ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...9yrs

No, it is a waste of time and effort to change my state’s current educational standards

@ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...9yrs

@5CCXLPPDemocratfrom New York  answered…2yrs

I support the core, but not the assessment culture that has been created to line the pockets of companies like Pearson. The assessment culture has warped the implementation of the core to something that can be measured by a computer. We're taking humanity out of education.

@56WSSWZfrom California  answered…2yrs

Currently common core standards are striving to instill critical thinking skills into student's curriculum. However, the study of the developmental nature of theses skills is not understood by many practicing teachers. Ethical reasoning is also a pocket of critical thinking that teachers education has ignored. Education should promote a populist of critical thinkers that can identify manipulative actions dressed as patriotism. Education should not be reduced to just getting a job. There are too many criminal minds, that know how to manipulate the weak thinker, the person with ego needs, and/or anyone with a button to push.

@4XNWMQYfrom Illinois  answered…2yrs

@5DPVJMNfrom New Jersey  answered…2yrs

Until Common Core includes God and Jesus in every class it will not have my support.

@4XQ23ZYfrom Maryland  answered…2yrs

@4PCCRNNfrom Pennsylvania  answered…2yrs

The educational system is to top heavy and limited. Top heavy because there are to many Superintendents and Principals, in the system and they make to much money. To limited because there is nowhere a teacher can get rid of students that do nothing but disrupt class. There should be a place these students could be sent other than normal classes and given a chance to prove they can return to normal classes if they improve there grades and behavior. Last Superintendents and Principals should be REQUIRED to carry guns in schools for school safety!

@4PKNJK4from Alabama  answered…2yrs


@4XMSP8Dfrom Pennsylvania  answered…2yrs

The teacher Union is too powerful to make any positive change in education. All they want is for taxpayers and politicians to throw money at them.

@5CBJXCPfrom Iowa  answered…2yrs

I think educational standards are very important but must allow states and families the ability to vote on curriculum that is in line with historical moral values. A minority view should not be forced on the conservative values of families. I also think alternative educational options for families should be in place.

@5CCVT5Qfrom California  answered…2yrs

Allowing children to be individual thinkers early on would allow for higher standards in education. Ending the the ivy league choke hold on our youth or older individuals who crave knowledge keeps 99 percent of our nation from innovation!

@56WTPKPfrom Vermont  answered…2yrs

The education system requires a complete reform. The current standards do nothing but promote the mishandling of schools and false education of our youth. Education should be rebuilt around developing skills in our youth and school hours lessened in order to allow the young to properly learn outside a classroom environment and adapt to realistic situations. The goals of our school boards should aim to provide youth with skills in trade, not only the skill to get accepted into colleges, a process that has come to stagnate the job market and waste precious time developing the lives of young adults.

@5DVXVHPfrom Texas  answered…2yrs

Emulate Germany. Three tiers: Trade school for future mechanics and workers. A Pre-Admin School for the non-technical workers that seem so important to the modern bureaucracy. And a technical high school for the people (like me) who actually design all the new toys that distract you all from the misery that life is without them.

@4PLDZHJfrom Texas  answered…2yrs

This reminds you of what Germany did in the 1930's. This will brainwash children to believe what the government instead of teaching them how to think for themselves

@4P8JVV7from New York  answered…2yrs

I think the schooling is done the right way now. I think the reason the politicians want common core is so they have some one to blame for the students not dong well! [The teacher]. The problem starts at home with the parents not holding the kids accountable for not doing well in school. I know a lot of kids that went through public school and did very well, because we had parents that cared and didn't blame the teacher.IF YOU PC POLITICIANS WOULD GET YOUR HEADS OUT OF YOUR BUTTS YOU WOULD SAY THIS AND STOP CODDLING THESE KIDS AND PARENTS!

@4PQ44JVfrom California  answered…2yrs

No!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Common Core is too hard it will make it difficult to get accepted into college.

@atlanta404from California  answered…2yrs

@4NFMWFBfrom Arizona  answered…2yrs

Education should be handled at the state and local level. Student should speak English. The only national requirement I'd support is teaching American national pride in being an American!

@4PM2753from New York  answered…2yrs

We need to look beyond the uniform. Push children to their potential and prepare them for their future in our workforce, that can't be done looking only at the basics.

@5DTPSVVfrom New York  answered…2yrs

Some standarized test are needed to compare students, but much of the content learned prior to college is nearly irrelevent. There should be broader more specialized programs in highschool, and there should not be this push for everyone to go to college. Higher education is run as a business, but the people as consumers unfortunately do not treat it as one.

@4WMVHR5from Oregon  answered…2yrs

In Europe at the 7th grade children are tested and explained to them what they are qualified to do in life and sent to a training program to learn a career they are capable of doing.

@5DSNYQFfrom Kansas  answered…2yrs

Like the ACT and SAT, there needs to be a "test"per grade level/age group that are the SAME for every state to take. All the state tests are NOT the same so, it is hard to compare data. The government should create national standards that align with the different tests.

@5CCRFT7from California  answered…2yrs

Yes, but only until high school, where students should then be allowed to choose what route they want to start studying to prepare for college.

@4NXTDTLfrom Georgia  answered…2yrs

No, teach ONLY the following curriculum: Math, Science (with a Creational perspective), History, (without the current Re-written Historical view point), English (including parts of speech, Grammar, poetry, etc.) Literature (tied to History, so the student can see how morality effects Literature), Art, Music, Drama (with the same emphasis...tied to History and how these "expressions", reflect the consesus of morality (or lack of) throughout History.

@5CBJ8RKfrom Vermont  answered…2yrs

@593QJ65from Colorado  answered…2yrs

There must be some common core standards, however education should teach to each student's potential as well. The two needs should not be mutually exclusive when balance.

@5CC94FQGreenfrom Colorado  answered…2yrs

I am a teacher, problem is the lack of inspiring teachers. The most important thing a child learns is how to reason, how to think, not useless data. Programs like common core concentrate on data.

@4PPLYXGfrom Texas  answered…2yrs

NO! Common Core is a waste and decreases the parents of this generation to be able to help their child with homework. The way we (30-40 something year old adults) were taught was not confusing to us as children or our parents.
Furthermore, nationally, children should NOT be taught to the least smart child in the class. They should, instead, be taught to the smartest child in the class as that will not only challenge the smartest of our youth, but will hopefully help those not as bright to push themselves to be better. If the child shows signs of truly trying and is still struggling, then decrease the level of difficulty to a point where the child grasps the subject concept, but not too easy to where they are not challenged.

@4PGDMGLfrom Idaho  answered…2yrs

All students should be taught reading, writing, math and life skills by integrating them all together so it all makes sense to the students. Reading plans on how to build something, math for budgeting and saving, writing for job applications and resumes, etc. Students should also be taught how to take care of themselves by learning the basics of cooking, gardening, whole foods vs. processed foods, sewing etc. They should also learn about physical activity and how it is important to a healthy life, music classes, art and sports. Every child is entitled to a well rounded education so they can be the best person they can be in the real world.

@4P9CXJXfrom California  answered…2yrs

It makes no difference, stupidity is incurable. If you can make it, good job, you're a funtioning human. Otherwise, evolve or die.

@966YGMX from Texas answered…1 day

Yes, but only if it gets better; right now, it isn't teaching kids valuable information

@966V3QH from Michigan answered…1 day

Yes, the concept is great but the current implementation need some improvement. Also allow States and local districts to customize their implementation.

@966DGZ6Women’s Equality from Idaho answered…2 days

Yes, but make sure and don't punish the students if they are unable to make that standard and supply them with the right help to get there.

@96645VL from North Carolina answered…2 days

No, education should be handled at the state and local level instead of the national level. Also, I believe in teaching to each student's potential instead of uniform testing.

@9646HPS from Texas answered…4 days

@9643MLY from Michigan answered…5 days

No, education must be radically reformed and modernized for the 21st century


The historical activity of users engaging with this question.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 


Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...