Try the political quiz
+

6 Replies

 @AbjectLolliesSocial Conservatism from Illinois  commented…12mos12MO

Honestly, I think this is the right move for the military. The armed forces are supposed to put readiness and cohesion above everything else, not social experiments. It’s not about hating anyone, but about making sure our troops are focused and prepared. The military has always had standards and restrictions for who can serve, and that’s for good reason. I don’t see why we should change long-standing policies just to be politically correct. At the end of the day, the priority should be national security, not pushing a social agenda.

 @89RGWYBAuthoritarian from California  commented…12mos12MO

It’s about time the military got back to focusing on discipline and readiness instead of social experiments. The armed forces need clear standards and unity, not distractions that could undermine effectiveness. I fully support the Pentagon’s decision—order and tradition are what make our military strong.

 @7HX3G4XNationalism from Alabama  commented…12mos12MO

The military should always put national security and cohesion first, so I support this move to keep our armed forces focused and strong.

 @Dem0cr4tCalProgressive from Minnesota  commented…12mos12MO

This is just blatant discrimination—trans people have every right to serve their country, and this policy is a huge step backward for equality and basic human rights.

 @5NS4QQCNeoliberalismfrom Florida  commented…12mos12MO

While I think the military should focus on readiness and effectiveness, targeting transgender troops like this seems like unnecessary discrimination that could hurt morale and recruitment. We should be striving for equal opportunity and letting people serve if they’re qualified, regardless of gender identity.

 @7YXT3MCReligious Right from New Jersey  commented…12mos12MO

I'm glad to see the Pentagon finally putting national security and military readiness first instead of pushing a social agenda.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...