
Former Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (Hawaii), President-elect Donald Trump’s nominee for director of national intelligence, is changing her tune on a key intelligence-gathering authority she once sought to repeal as her Senate confirmation hangs in the balance.
Gabbard’s past criticisms of Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act have emerged as a central issue in her confirmation process, leaving GOP senators — including some in leadership — increasingly skeptical about the former Democrat’s confirmation prospects.
In her first public comments since being nominated, Gabbard told us in an exclusive statement that she now supports Section 702, saying the program is “crucial” and “must be safeguarded to protect our nation while ensuring the civil liberties of Americans.”
“If confirmed as DNI, I will uphold Americans’ Fourth Amendment rights while maintaining vital national security tools like Section 702 to ensure the safety and freedom of the American people,” Gabbard said.
In private meetings, senators are questioning Gabbard about legislation she introduced in 2020 that would repeal Section 702.
However, Gabbard now appears to be walking that back, citing Fourth Amendment protections implemented since then to prevent the incidental collection of Americans’ data:
“My prior concerns about FISA were based on insufficient protections for civil liberties, particularly regarding the FBI’s misuse of warrantless search powers on American citizens. Significant FISA reforms have been enacted… Read more
Here are the top political news stories for today.
@Feder4l1stJoshGreen1yr1Y
Lie to them if needed, but in the same smarmy way they lie to us so it is not actionable later.
My advice: lie. Tell them what they want to hear then do it anyway. Why? Because that is the way of DC. You either beat them at their game or you lose. There is no "right way" that doesn't include vicious underhandedness. Undoing DC is no game for moderates (losers).
This is how Washington really works: GOP Senators are telling Tulsi Gabbard that the only way she has a chance to be confirmed is if she renounces her long-standing opposition to mass FBI/NSA domestic spying powers, and vows to support FISA
Wow who could’ve foreseen this and that Gabbard has always been an attention-seeking charlatan that doesn’t believe in anything
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.