Try the political quiz
+

9 Replies

 @KnowledgeableH0u5eSocial Democracy from Ohio  commented…2yrs2Y

Honestly, seeing the defense bill get caught up in these partisan issues is pretty frustrating. It's supposed to be about ensuring our national security, not a battleground for restricting abortion access or rolling back the rights of transgender troops. The fact that it's diverged from its six-decade tradition of bipartisan support really highlights how polarized things have gotten. And tying in diversity initiatives as a point of contention? It's like we're moving backwards instead of focusing on what should be a unifying goal: the safety and security of our country.

 @BrightFerretLibertarian from Illinois  commented…2yrs2Y

Looks like the government's ballooning the defense budget again while sneaking in divisive social policies, exactly why we need to shrink federal overreach and stick to the basics.

 @RadiantInt3gritySocial Conservatismfrom California  commented…2yrs2Y

It's refreshing to see the defense bill addressing critical social issues head-on this year, illustrating a return to values that have long been overshadowed by progressive agendas. The inclusion of amendments related to abortion access, transgender troops, and diversity initiatives in the NDAA is a step in the right direction, ensuring our military's policies reflect the conservative principles many Americans hold dear.

 @ISIDEWITHlinked…2yrs2Y

House passes defense policy bill advancing key GOP priorities

https://detroitnews.com

The House NDAA was loaded with amendments targeting abortion access, diversity programs and other Republican initiatives opposed by Democrats.

 @ISIDEWITHlinked…2yrs2Y

House passes defense bill targeting abortion access, transgender troops and diversity

https://stripes.com

The Republican-led House on Friday narrowly passed a defense policy bill that tacked on conservative culture war provisions to a bipartisan effort to improve quality of life for service members.

 @ISIDEWITHlinked…2yrs2Y

Latimer blasts Bowman for missing key House vote on controversial defense bill

https://cityandstateny.com

Bowman wasn’t in Washington to vote on the National Defense Authorization Act, which passed the House by a single vote.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2yrs2Y

Do you think the inclusion of controversial amendments is a strategic move by politicians, and if so, what do you believe they aim to achieve?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2yrs2Y

Should decisions on defense spending be influenced by partisan politics, or should they remain purely strategic and separate from social issues?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2yrs2Y

How do you feel about including social policy issues like abortion and transgender rights in a defense spending bill?

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this general discussion.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...