Try the political quiz

287 Replies

 @ISIDEWITHasked…6mos6MO

If public transportation was free and efficient, would that change your thoughts on owning a car or living farther from work or school?

 @9JRB8NY from Texas answered…6mos6MO

People will take advantage of free transportation and in my opinion become lazy due to non-stop travel

  @9CJ6CB6 from Virginia commented…5mos5MO

I think there are methods of combating that, or at least, dissuading lazy use.

 @9JRC4Q6Democrat from Virginia answered…6mos6MO

Yes, if public transportation was better maintained and more accessible, I would consider not owning a car, or using it less

 @9JS38LL from Florida disagreed…6mos6MO

I would not be comfortable with government controlled transportation, they control it and I prefer freedom of transportation..

  @9CJ6CB6 from Virginia commented…5mos5MO

Government control of transportation doesn’t mean that other transport isn’t destroyed, it’s just that a basic system of public transport is built, freedom doesn’t necessarily disappear.

 @9JRCBL4 from California answered…6mos6MO

Probably not but it would be useful knowing that if I needed to have access to public transportation I would.

 @9JRDNFM from Arizona disagreed…6mos6MO

Because public transportation systems don’t go exactly where u need to go and they aren’t everywhere

  @8YB3Z64 from Texas answered…6 days6D

My opinion on this has more to do with owning a Vehicle is becoming more and more of a hassle and expensive. Making Public Transportation more appealing.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

What potential differences might you see in social dynamics if higher taxes on the rich funded welfare programs?

 @9KF78PLRepublican from California answered…5mos5MO

People making a lot of money aren't millionaires or billionaires so we shouldn't take from them because others dont know how to make good life choices and couldn't make a better life.

 @9KF7FSV from Texas answered…5mos5MO

Less poverty, better health of the average person in the nation, less stress, fewer billionaires, cleaner cities, better technology, the 1950s without the blatant bigotry

 @9KF74YR  from Illinois answered…5mos5MO

Less healthcare costs for the government as lower income people go into the ER less

 @9KF79MLDemocrat from California answered…5mos5MO

I think the rich would be more appreciative and conservative with their money.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…6mos6MO

If housing was more affordable due to government subsidies, how might that influence where you choose to live?

 @9JP7D74 from Texas answered…6mos6MO

 @9JNYD9Danswered…6mos6MO

because if its more affordable then it would also be more affordable to stay there for a long time.

 @9JNXHDZLibertarian from Texas answered…6mos6MO

 @ISIDEWITHasked…6mos6MO

Can you imagine a working world without the pressure of job security, and if so, what would it look like?

 @9JNYF6VDemocrat from Colorado answered…6mos6MO

No, I Can't. The pressure of Job security is a very real and necessary thing. It keeps people working and things moving.

  @9CJ6CB6 from Virginia commented…5mos5MO

It’s also one of the greatest killers in the US, the last thing we need is more stress, since stress remains one of the biggest factors in premature deaths, right alongside poor regulation on food quality that leads to heart disease and cancer. If we’ve gotta be forced under the threat of poverty just to keep society running, then by much of that logic, incentives such as making not working a crime wouldn’t be immoral either.

 @9JNXXJWRepublicananswered…6mos6MO

Many people would have a job and depending on the character of the individual having job security could make them better or worse.

 @9JNXWJSDemocrat from New York answered…6mos6MO

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

How could greater access to public arts and cultural programs influence your community involvement or personal growth?

 @9KF7WVD from Florida answered…5mos5MO

I have all the access I need. I volunteer with the National Park Service.

 @9KF789K from California answered…5mos5MO

It would allow our community to see more opportunities and see what they can resonate with

 @9KF6XH9 from California answered…5mos5MO

Public arts and cultural programs provide opportunities for people to come together, interact, and engage with one another in shared experiences. Participating in community arts events, such as festivals, exhibitions, or performances, fosters a sense of belonging and strengthens social connections within the community.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…8mos8MO

Should access to high-quality education be a right for all, regardless of personal wealth?

 @9H86V6DPeace and Freedom from Texas answered…8mos8MO

Yes, we want the future to be bright and when only so mnay people can get access to good schooling it is missed opportunity for many.

 @9H86T6F from Texas answered…8mos8MO

 @9H876BSRepublican from North Carolina answered…8mos8MO

I believe that one should have to work for their education, and should not the person's wealth, but only the person's educational success.

  @Patriot-#1776Constitution from Washington answered…6mos6MO

No, God created rights to protect you from harm, not to allow you to plunder other people and force them to provide a service you want.

  @9CJ6CB6 from Virginia commented…6mos6MO

Everyone pays, everyone benefits. That’s how this is supposed to work. The majority of people agree with this, and if you want an unregulated economy, hop into a Time Machine and go to 1892 Pittsburgh, then talk to me about how glorious laissez-faire capitalism is.

  @Patriot-#1776Constitution from Washington commented…6mos6MO

1892 Pittsburgh, where socialist steel union members burnt down and barricaded the homes of non-union workers in a campaign of terror, defaced the equivalent of hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of private property, and rioted lawlessly in the streets?

  @9CJ6CB6 from Virginia commented…6mos6MO

Dear ******** lord, you can’t seriously think the unions were the problem, can you? They were losing 50% of their pay, the corporations were literally FORCING them to work, our rights in the workplace didn’t exist, they GAVE us that by rioting and protesting, because ****** es like Carnegie and Henry Frick were literally ordering military strikes against their workers for blockading their factory, in the name of not being treated like garbage and given nothing back but wage cuts and longer workdays. I’m truly not going to change what happened at that time, it got the attent…  Read more

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

In a world where essential services are rights, not privileges, how would you define privilege?

 @9KM6CPRRepublican from Arkansas answered…5mos5MO

People born in america should have the privilage of not taking a citizenship exam

 @9KM5Y7N from New Jersey answered…5mos5MO

I think privilege is given too easily and not at the same time. Privilege is something people are born with when they don't need it and some people have power that they abuse, limiting people's privilege.

 @9KM5VW5 from New Jersey answered…5mos5MO

Not paying people to fight in a war for you, or not paying your way out of a murder or felony charge (can still have bail).

 @ISIDEWITHasked…8mos8MO

How would you feel if your tax dollars were used to provide healthcare and education for everyone?

 @9H8T6GF from Illinois answered…8mos8MO

 @9H8SC8J from Texas answered…8mos8MO

I don’t really like it but I mean it still helps people and I’m not about to fight to get it changed when it actually helps people

 @9H8S2CH from Iowa answered…8mos8MO

I wouldn't mind because despite people putting themselves in that situation some people truly need help and I know my money is going to a good cause.

 @9H8XTHG from Nebraska answered…8mos8MO

 @ISIDEWITHasked…8mos8MO

If you knew that no matter where you lived, your children would receive a top-quality education, how would that influence your life choices?

  @Patriot-#1776Constitution from Washington answered…6mos6MO

 @ISIDEWITHasked…7mos7MO

How would you reconcile the desire for personal wealth with the need to address extreme poverty through government programs?

  @9CJ6CB6 from Virginia commented…5mos5MO

High taxes upon the rich, redistribution into gearing the system towards helping the poor, allowing creators to cash in on ideas and new products, but being subject to regulation in some cases. Gearing pay towards merit, with the minimum wage simply being a standard to help the poor stay above the poverty line.

 @9HZGQ2X from California answered…7mos7MO

 @9HZGFPT from California answered…7mos7MO

I would be willing to give up some personal wealth to combat societal problems

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...