More Popular Issues
See how voters are siding on other popular political issues...
Results from Household (single-father) voters
Last answered 2 hours ago
Distribution of answers submitted by Household (single-father) voters.
Data includes total votes submitted by visitors since Dec 12, 2011. For users that answer more than once (yes we know), only their most recent answer is counted in the total results. Total percentages may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Household data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011).
Choose a demographic filter
- District of Columbia
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- North Carolina
- North Dakota
- Rhode Island
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- West Virginia
7 years ago by themindunleashed.org
7 years ago by huffingtonpost.com
7 years ago by dailycurrant.com
7 years ago by dontbeafuckingidiot.com
8 years ago by youtube.com
8 years ago by youtube.com
Data based on unique submissions (duplicates or multiple submissions are eliminated) per user using a 30-day moving average to reduce daily variance from traffic sources. Totals may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
More stances on this issue
Yes, and free any "criminal" that was arrested for marijuana possession and ONLY marijuana possession. (not if there's other charges included). 7 years ago from a Republican in Milwaukee, WI
Decriminalize for the first two offenses for personal use. Make it a civil fine where it does not affect a young person arrest record that may prevent tem from job employment. Third offense or more should be transferred to criminal court. 7 years ago from a Republican in Des Moines, IA
Tax and regulate plus release of current MJ offenders whose only offense is possession. 7 years ago from a Republican in Wilmington, NC
Within five years marijuana abuse will escalate requiring increasing state and federal regulation. This will first be noticed in the number of automobile accidents due to marijuana impairment. 7 years ago from a Democrat in Cleveland, OH
No. Not until there is a way to test if someone is high on the spot, as a breathalyzer does for alcohol. Then legalize, tax, and regulate it for individuals over 21. 7 years ago from a Democrat in Kalamazoo, MI
Decriminalize, tax and control it on a state and local level with harsh penalties for public use and providing it to minors. 7 years ago from a Republican in Moreno Valley, CA
It should be each states decision to legalize marijuana. 7 years ago from a Republican in Flushing, NY
Eliminate all prohibition laws regarding plants and other substances. Prohibition failed for alcohol, it has failed for plant and other materials, and the free market should control the market for those materials just like it does for so many others. 7 years ago from a Republican in Meridian, ID
Yes, primarily for medicinal purposes. However, they should follow the same guidelines as cigarettes (no smoking in public places) and alcohol (can't be under the influence at work or when operating a vehicle or machinery). 7 years ago from a Democrat in Calumet City, IL
No. Drugs all too often result in harm of an individual person or others. 7 years ago from a Democrat in Lakewood, CA
Legalize, tax and regulate at the federal level, AND release all drug offenders, hard drug offenders into treatment programs, marijuana offenders simply released with all record of a conviction wiped off their record. 7 years ago from a Socialist in Grand Prairie, TX
Yes but in force strict laws on the usage of marijuana And the consequence of being high in public locations. Marijuana for any other purpose beside medicinal use should be taxed. 7 years ago from a Democrat in Hialeah, FL
Yes, if people want to make the choice to smoke pot, they take on the risks and it is not my, or my government's, problem. 7 years ago from a Democrat in Gilbert, AZ
It should be left to the states. But as in Illinois, Medicine is not taxed--so beware of the "tax it and pay the debt argument." It should be regulated heavily, perhaps with a larger tax (and user fee) for those who choose it recreationally. 7 years ago from a Republican in Monmouth, IL