Yes, but only increase for the elderly and disabled
No, and each state should decide their own level of coverage
Yes, but I prefer switching to a single payer healthcare system
No, and eligibility should only include the elderly and disabled
No, and the federal government should not increase funding for any social programs
No, and abolish Medicaid

Historical Results

See how support for each position on “Medicaid” has changed over time for 11.4m America voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

See how importance of “Medicaid” has changed over time for 11.4m America voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from America users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.

 @8HHQPHG from Georgia answered…4yrs4Y

i mean i get that the government wants to help them but it doesn't make since while one person is struggling while helping them by raising the taxs on other citizens causing half of the us falling to save one person

 @8X97FN7 from New York answered…3yrs3Y

the government would not have to spend so much money for medicaid if they regulated insurance companies more. Patents on medicine should be illegal and healthcare for those who are unemployed should be for US citizens who cannot work and their employers cannot supply acceptable healthcare benefits

 @9DBVZNS from California answered…10mos10MO

 @8FST4P6 from Georgia answered…4yrs4Y

It would seem that if my state opted in that my property, sales and state income tax would have to increase to absorb this. If this is the case it would impact me the same. I don’t think the federal government should have their hands in private sector.

Latest News

Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Medicaid” news articles, updated frequently.

Other Popular Questions

Explore other questions that America voters are discussing.