Pete Hegseth, President-elect Donald Trump’s pick for secretary of defense, has repeatedly criticized policies allowing gay people to serve openly in the US military, calling them part of a “Marxist” agenda to prioritize social justice over combat readiness.
In his 2024 book “The War on Warriors” and in subsequent media promotions this year, Hegseth described both the original “don’t ask, don’t tell” (DADT) policy and its repeal in 2011 as a “gateway” and a “camouflage” for broader cultural changes that he claims have undermined military cohesion and effectiveness.
In a 2015 appearance on Fox News, Hegseth also argued these policies like repealing DADT “erode standards” in favor of political goals like social engineering.
DADT was implemented under President Bill Clinton in the 1990s and allowed gay people and lesbians to serve in the military — provided they did not disclose their sexuality.
Military officials were also barred from asking military members their sexual orientation.
If a troop’s orientation came to light, it could lead to their discharge.
The policy was repealed during the Obama administration, allowing openly gay service members.
Hegseth writes in his book that he was initially ambivalent to the change but came to regret his passive stance, describing the repeal as a “breach in the wire” that opened the door for broader cultural and ideological changes in the military.
On Thursday, Hegseth appeared to walk back his earlier remarks about DADT, telling CNN, “Oppose the repeal? No, I don’t,” and calling this report on his previous comments “more false reporting.”
.Here are the top political news stories for today.
@SadSenateRepublican1yr1Y
Gays shouldn’t serve plain and simple. Anything with a romantic/love/sex conflict of interest or the possibility of it is too dangerous and distracting.
@JusticeRiceGreen1yr1Y
Glad to know our straight soldiers are proud virgins who don’t think about sex or love.
@MAGA_Deplorable1yr1Y
That's not what he claimed, moron. If you have an issue with Hegseth's positions, feel free to talk about it. But don't resort to creating straw man arguments no one ever made.
@Renaldo-MoonGreen1yr1Y
Name one good reason gays shouldn't be allowed to serve.
@MAGA_Deplorable1yr1Y
Because they are *attracted to* their brothers-in-arms. Can't have romance on the battle-field, especially not that kind of "romance." If you've ever seen how humiliatingly awkward and stupid people behave around those they are attracted to –– and I'm certain you have at least once in your life –– then you should realise that anyone in that kind of situation will not be thinking clearly and performing optimally at combat.
Anybody willing to defend our country should be honored and praised.
@solo-von-kickpaw 1yr1Y
no more **** ing lgbtq troops (・–・) \(・◡・)/
@8QVTKGVLibertarian1yr1Y
What happened to "as long as they can do the job"?
YIKES
Yeah he shouldn’t be confirmed
We've been over this bull **** already - there are too many important, mission-critical people in the military that have been highly trained and hard to replace who are lgbtq - a ban makes no sense and would harm the military. Any talk of re-introducing a ban is counterproductive
Has there ever been a worse batch of transition picks?
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.