Restorative justice programs focus on rehabilitating offenders through reconciliation with victims and the community, rather than through traditional incarceration. These programs often involve dialogue, restitution, and community service. Proponents argue that restorative justice reduces recidivism, heals communities, and provides more meaningful accountability for offenders. Opponents argue that it may not be suitable for all crimes, could be perceived as too lenient, and may not adequately deter future criminal behavior.
70% Yes |
30% No |
70% Yes |
30% No |
See how support for each position on “Restorative Justice Programs” has changed over time for 4.2k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Restorative Justice Programs” has changed over time for 4.2k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from America users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@8XLR4JX 1mo1MO
Yes, except for criminals convicted of heinous crimes like rape or murder and/or who show no signs of remorse
@9Q5CV2K4wks4W
It depends on the crime. Drug possession, vandalism, etc yes. Murder, rape etc, no, that will not work with those criminals.
@9RDKXM84 days4D
Yes but only for criminals who have not committed pre-meditated murder (unless the pre-meditated murder was in self-defense).
@9RD7D8N4 days4D
Yes, in less severe crimes. Violence and similar crimes need incarceration and other more severe forms of punishment
@9RCT9XH4 days4D
Yes, to an extent. If someone is a first time non violent offender this could be a great alternative. However, if someone has committed multiple offenses or violent offenses then no, this would not work.
@9RCHZJT4 days4D
The government should implement restorative justice programs as an alternative option to incarceration subject to victim approval and judicial review.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
