Mandatory GPS tracking involves using GPS technology in all vehicles to monitor driving behavior and improve road safety. Proponents argue that it enhances road safety and reduces accidents by monitoring and correcting dangerous driving behaviors. Opponents argue that it infringes on personal privacy and could lead to government overreach and misuse of data.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Response rates from 15.2k America voters.
10% Yes |
90% No |
10% Yes |
90% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 15.2k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 15.2k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from America voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@B4D6KHP2mos2MO
No, for the sake of privacy, the 14th amendment, the constitution, freedom, federalism, weak government, and checks and balances.
@B4C6FCD2mos2MO
No, that can easily lead to danger and/or control. The only application I can see for this is if the person has caused an incident beforehand.
@9V8GHCH8mos8MO
Yes, only to people with a history of reckless driving, drunk driving, or any kind of driving that puts others at risk.
@B5DT9MK1wk1W
No, but I think that insurance companies should be allowed to make this a requirement for individuals with poor driving histories or new drivers.
@B5D5WXN1wk1W
Hell no, all that does it allow the government to control our movement for various corrupt or evil reasons. Too much liability, uncertainty, and lack of trust.
@B5BSVK22wks2W
yes, only for new car models: alowing cars to still exist without the need of gps unless its needed to be instald.
@B55LWJC3wks3W
No, but only for reckless drivers or known violent criminals for a short time (maybe like a year or so) to ensure they have rehabilitated
@B54JYWP3wks3W
No, that's would be extreme government overreach. We don't need to live in more of a surveillance state than we already do.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
