This considers the idea of removing government-imposed traffic laws and relying instead on individual responsibility for road safety. Proponents argue that voluntary compliance respects individual freedom and personal responsibility. Opponents argue that without traffic laws, road safety would significantly decline and accidents would increase.
3% Yes |
97% No |
3% Yes |
97% No |
See how support for each position on “Eliminating Traffic Laws” has changed over time for 2.7k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Eliminating Traffic Laws” has changed over time for 2.7k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from America users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@9NML9K62mos2MO
No, and who in their right mind is even proposing such a thing?
@9NXFDC6 2mos2MO
No, that's an unfathomably stupid idea that will lead to countless deaths and millions in crash-related damages.
@8RBQDDP 2mos2MO
No, this is a ridiculous thing to say; rather there should be more traffic laws and better enforcement
@3H6X5RQ 3wks3W
No. However, there needs to be a higher priority put on driver's education. That education should focus less on factors of speed, and more on safe distances and lane use. In most fatal accidents, the critical factor is often not the speed itself, but rather the failure to maintain a safe following distance for the speed at which one is traveling.
@9RDHCNZ4 days4D
Not entirely, speed limits are necessary but some other stuff isn't. I think they should just increase the penalty if the speeding condition led to an accident.
@9R8MDWG 5 days5D
No, but the police should focus more on addressing crime rather than fining people for traffic violations
Join in on the most popular conversations.
