This question considers whether maintaining and repairing current infrastructure should take precedence over constructing new roads and bridges. Proponents argue that it ensures safety, extends the life of existing infrastructure, and is more cost-effective. Opponents argue that new infrastructure is needed to support growth and improve transportation networks.
82% Yes |
18% No |
82% Yes |
18% No |
See how support for each position on “Road Maintenance vs. New Infrastructure” has changed over time for 2.4k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Road Maintenance vs. New Infrastructure” has changed over time for 2.4k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from America users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@8XLR4JX 1mo1MO
Yes, except in rural areas that lack existing infrastructure
@9NQL5VP2mos2MO
Yes, unless existing roads and infrastructure are too old and new infrastructure is deemed more suitable to support growth.
@9PZ2HB54wks4W
No, because building new infrastructure should be just as important as maintenance and repair. It just depends weather or not existing infostructure can updated to modern needs and regulations, if it isn't then new infostructure should be built to replace it.
@9NXFDC6 2mos2MO
Yes, but I would rather privatize all infrastructure
@9NQD7DB2mos2MO
No, Prioritize both maintaining current infrastructure as well as constructing new infrastructure.
@9NHS5NN2mos2MO
Yes, but they should also help build new ones too.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
