Fuel efficiency standards set the required average fuel economy for vehicles, aiming to reduce fuel consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. Proponents argue that it helps reduce emissions, save consumers money on fuel, and decrease reliance on fossil fuels. Opponents argue that it raises production costs, leading to higher vehicle prices, and may not have a significant impact on overall emissions.
52% Yes |
48% No |
52% Yes |
48% No |
See how support for each position on “Fuel Efficiency Requirements” has changed over time for 56.1k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Fuel Efficiency Requirements” has changed over time for 56.1k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from America users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@9QR8JKT3wks3W
The government should incentivize fuel alternatives and impose stricter standards for fuel distributors.
@9PZ2HB54wks4W
No, but it should impose only moderate standers/more of a hands off approach while the market/people want more efficient standards on vehicles. Although I am in favor of better fuel efficiency it just I don't trust the government to implement those standers because I don't want government over reach and for it to take away what ever freedoms that U.S. citizens still have.
@9RDMYH64 days4D
Yes but incentivize with offsetting increasing costs of fuel efficient vehicles by limiting price or with a tax return
@9RDJ5GS4 days4D
No. Instead they should offer more incentives to e vehicle manufacturers and infrastructure companies.
@9RDF93Y4 days4D
Emissions regulations should be balanced with the carbon footprint, longevity, maintenance implications and research and development they impose. Regulations that create a shorter service life for vehicles systems don't serve the consumer or the environment.
@9RDDSGC 4 days4D
No, vehicles themselves are inherently a problem, and the production of new vehicles, regardless of fuel efficiency, let alone EVs, have an incredibly high up-front cost in terms of carbon emissions and other environmental damage; the majority of the time, it is overwhelmingly better to use an older, pre-owned, less efficient vehicle than a new one; additionally, overly strict efficiency standards would disproportionately affect poor individuals who are unable to purchase new, compliant vehicles.
Join in on the most popular conversations.