Electric and hybrid vehicles use electricity and a combination of electricity and fuel, respectively, to reduce reliance on fossil fuels and decrease emissions. Proponents argue that it significantly cuts pollution and advances the transition to renewable energy sources. Opponents argue that it increases vehicle costs, limits consumer choice, and may strain the electric grid.
24% Yes |
76% No |
24% Yes |
76% No |
See how support for each position on “Electric Vehicle Mandates” has changed over time for 2.2k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Electric Vehicle Mandates” has changed over time for 2.2k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from America users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@9QWTY66 2wks2W
No, climate change is not the fault of the individual. Instead, improve public transport and limit corporate and government carbon emissions.
@935PNTQ 4 days4D
Only if there is a readily available supply of EVs, and its been proven it will not strain the electric grid. Offer incentives for trading in a gas vehicle, offer services for and incentives to invent a way to either replace a gas powered engine with EV components, or putting a classic/discontinued model frame on an EV base (crown vic, classic f150s, etc)
@9RBPJVG5 days5D
No, but CO2 prices should be so high that it is only economical to use combustion engines in specialized use cases.
@9RBNF7D5 days5D
we need to figure out a more sustainable energy course first
@9RB74MN5 days5D
No. The "Battery EV" experiment should be abandoned, and transition over to Hydrogen (both FCEV and H-ICE).
@9R9WWV9 5 days5D
Yes, but it should be a graduated expectation that begins with incentives and subsidies and availability of charging stations.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
