These subsidies are financial aids from the government to help individuals purchase their first home, making homeownership more accessible. Proponents argue that it helps people afford their first home and promotes homeownership. Opponents argue that it distorts the housing market and could lead to higher prices.
70% Yes |
30% No |
70% Yes |
30% No |
See how support for each position on “First-time Homebuyer Subsidies” has changed over time for 5.7k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “First-time Homebuyer Subsidies” has changed over time for 5.7k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from America users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@9RDHCNZ4 days4D
Government deed backed loans before purchase instead of a subsidy or tax break to people who can't get a traditional mortgage.
@bunnies444 4 days4D
No, they should provide subsidies only to the disabled, and regulate the housing market to make houses affordable.
@9RD45SM4 days4D
No. Providing a limit to the rise of home prices and restricting ownership of single family residences by corporations would be more effective.
@9RD2Q3J4 days4D
The government should do more in providing housing so it isn't primarily a product of the private sector.
@9RC75754 days4D
No, find other ways to lower the cost of housing. Or make college cheaper so people can actually afford to live on their own.
@9R87XVH5 days5D
Yes, interest rate should be set to 3% for first time home buyers no matter the housing market and based on credit score. Max is 5%.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
