+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 143k America voters.

71%
Yes
29%
No
71%
Yes
29%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 143k America voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 143k America voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from America voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9ZJSZ8Z from Indiana  answered…5mos5MO

No, the government should focus on lowering interest rates and inflation, which would lower the cost of home buying for first time buyers.

 @9RSDVGN from Virginia  answered…9mos9MO

No, but they should incentivize construction of more housing and residential buildings to reduce prices.

 @9RZY5CM from Louisiana  answered…9mos9MO

I'd rather the government make landlords illegal and take over all their properties. And charge a much lower amount to rent to non-homeowners.

 @7WDP6PT  from North Carolina  answered…2mos2MO

Yes, this would help ease the burden of bills of the first time home buyer and make people want to get a house as well

 @9RFDC4V from Kansas  answered…9mos9MO

Depends on income and the type of house being developed. If it is for purely ownership of the house to be used by the owner and used as the primary residence by the family then yes it should be subsidized.

 @B4Q8TSR from Florida  answered…1wk1W

No, abolish all property taxes and implement a land-value tax on all secondary properties instead to increase individual home ownership and decrease rentals

 @B4DZVF8 from California  answered…3wks3W

No, but the government should try to make home purchases more affordable by creating policies that facilitate (or don't get in the way of) housing production, outside of necessary safety regulations.

 @B4D6KHP from Georgia  answered…3wks3W

No, this will raise taxes and raise the national debt. Also, this is an anathema towards capitalism, weak government, checks and balances, and federalism.