70%
Yes
30%
No
70%
Yes
30%
No

Historical Results

See how support for each position on “Geoengineering” has changed over time for 3.8k America voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

See how importance of “Geoengineering” has changed over time for 3.8k America voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from America users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.

 @9MJTP4Gfrom Guam answered…2mos2MO

Yes, but with caution and careful consideration of potential risks and benefits.

  @Sablevarg from Missouri answered…1mo1MO

Yes, but these should be carefully vetted to limit potential negative effects and used in conjunction with an green energy - not a replacement for green energy.

 @9L4Z23B  from Pennsylvania answered…2mos2MO

Yes, the Department of Interior should engage in P3's to research geoengineering and other ways to combat climate change

  @ChaseOliverLibertarian  from South Carolina answered…2mos2MO

The best way to combat climate change is by reducing taxes and artificial barriers to entry so that incentives for innovation allow the market to provide solutions,

 @9PRRX6T from South Dakota answered…1mo1MO

No, divert climate change "research" into recycling and renewable methods and practices such as the promises we made in the 90s that fall short. and reduce pollution in general(I.E. clean the ocean garbage patches, remove microplastics from water, divert waste and encourage recycling programs, and burn unrecyclable materials for energy sources carbon capture those materials and convert into graphene for computer based technologies)

 @9R95696 from Texas answered…5 days5D

Yes, build in agreement with the climate to reduce the need for excess utilities, but not so far that communities become climate controlled and reliant on technology to function.