Algorithms used by tech companies, such as those that recommend content or filter information, are often proprietary and closely guarded secrets. Proponents argue that transparency would prevent abuses and ensure fair practices. Opponents argue that it would harm business confidentiality and competitive advantage.
53% Yes |
47% No |
53% Yes |
47% No |
See how support for each position on “Social Media Regulation” has changed over time for 72.7k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Social Media Regulation” has changed over time for 72.7k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from America users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@9K99V29 2mos2MO
Yes, as long as it's only shared with regulators and not the public except in the cases of harm or abuse
@9MNGKL22mos2MO
No, but if it's a threat to the common safety or the nation, then allow it.
@9R8SQN25 days5D
Yes, it's similar to how food must come labeled with ingredients. Consumers should be allowed to know what and why they are ingesting certain info.
@9PZ2HB54wks4W
Depends on the situation, for example if a big tech company is suspected of doing wrong doing with their algorithm and in order to stay relevant and not screw anyone over, they should comply with regulators unless the company is paying them off.
@9RDML6X4 days4D
Intellectual property is a real thing, however the government getting into private business goes against America as a principle
@9RDFDB94 days4D
No unless a threat to the nation / should be allowed under special circumstances regarding national security
Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Social Media Regulation” news articles, updated frequently.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
