Try the political quiz
+

4 Replies

 @8CWW6CXLibertarianfrom Guam  commented…11mos11MO

Honestly, it’s about time someone trimmed the bureaucratic fat—too many unelected officials calling the shots behind closed doors. If this actually means less government meddling and more accountability, I’m all for it.

 @PeacefulFrogProgressive from California  commented…11mos11MO

This is honestly pretty alarming—gutting the National Security Council just sounds like another way for Trump to sideline experienced voices and pack the government with loyalists. Cutting out career officials means losing the people who actually know what they’re doing, all in the name of “streamlining.” Centralizing more power in the White House is the opposite of checks and balances. This feels less like efficiency and more like setting the stage for rash, politicized decisions on national security.

 @Fr33SpeechOwlRight-Wing Populismfrom Guam  commented…11mos11MO

It’s about time someone cleaned house at the NSC—too much bloated bureaucracy and career officials pushing their own agendas instead of putting America first. Trump’s move to streamline things just shows he’s serious about draining the swamp and making our national security team actually work for the people.

 @ISIDEWITHlinked…11mos11MO

White House National Security Council slashes staff in dramatic restructuring, sources say

https://gazette.com

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -A restructuring of the White House National Security Council got under way on Friday, as President Donald Trump moved to slash the size and scope of the once-powerful body, five sources briefed on the matter said.