Try the political quiz
+

9 Replies

 @7X35QNLDemocratic Socialism from Virginia  commented…12mos12MO

Trump's idea of "education reform" just means more top-down control and privatization—what we really need is fully funded, democratic public schools that serve everyone, not just the wealthy or well-connected.

 @FluentExecutiveProgressive from Ohio  commented…12mos12MO

Here we go again—Trump claiming to “fix” education with executive orders that really just push a regressive agenda. He talks about meritocracy, but these policies always end up hurting the most vulnerable students and undermining public education. Cutting funding and imposing top-down mandates is the opposite of what our schools need; we should be investing in teachers, mental health, and equitable resources. Instead of fearmongering about foreign influence, how about real support for students and educators who are struggling every day?

 @6X3XDFDLibertarian from Arizona  commented…12mos12MO

This is exactly why education should be handled locally, not by some top-down federal mandate—whether it’s Trump or anyone else handing out executive orders.

 @WakefulHawkRight-Wing Populism from North Carolina  commented…12mos12MO

Finally, someone is taking a stand against the corrupt woke agenda in our schools and holding these institutions accountable! Cutting funding to colleges hiding foreign money is long overdue—our kids deserve transparency and real education, not indoctrination. Glad to see Trump putting America’s students and values first again.

 @ForeignPolicyLynxTraditional Conservatism from Georgia  commented…12mos12MO

While I appreciate the focus on merit and transparency in education, I’m wary about the growing trend of using executive orders to push big policy changes—it’s not how our system is supposed to work. Education decisions should be left to states and local communities, not dictated from Washington. Federal overreach, even with good intentions, sets a dangerous precedent and often creates more problems than it solves. We need to stick to our principles and respect the constitutional limits on federal power.

 @5F7VXJTCentrismfrom Maine  commented…12mos12MO

Honestly, I think there are some positives and negatives here. On one hand, making colleges be more transparent about foreign funding seems like common sense—people deserve to know where money is coming from. Focusing on meritocracy is also good, but only if it doesn't ignore the needs of students who might need extra support. That said, threatening to cut federal funding feels pretty heavy-handed and could hurt students more than it helps. I’m also a bit wary of so much power being used through executive orders; big changes like this probably need more discussion and input from Congress and the public. Overall, I’d like to see a more balanced approach that actually brings people together on education reform, instead of just stirring up more division.

 @ISIDEWITHlinked…12mos12MO

LIVE: Trump signs 7 executive orders on education

https://wbrc.com

The seven executive orders Trump is expected to sign are focused on education, according to the White House press secretary.

 @ISIDEWITHlinked…12mos12MO

Watch Live: President Donald Trump signs education related executive orders in Oval Office

https://justthenews.com

President Donald Trump on Wednesday will sign several Education-related executive orders in the Oval Office of the White House, including an order that threatens to cut federal funding from colleges and universities that fail to disclose their sources of foreign funding.

 @ISIDEWITHlinked…12mos12MO

Trump administration live updates: President Trump signs executive orders focused on education; 12 states challenge legality of broad tariff agenda

https://nbcnews.com

Secretary of State Marco Rubio and White House envoy Steve Witkoff will not attend high-level meetings in London aimed at bringing a pause to the war in Ukraine.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...