
“Given the timing of when it goes into effect over a holiday weekend a day before inauguration, it will be up to the next administration to implement,” a White House official similarly told Politico.
The White House did not immediately respond to The Hill’s request for comment.
Democrats including former Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer have urged the Chinese company owned by ByteDance to divest and sell the platform to an American owner.
“It’s clear that more time is needed to find an American buyer and not disrupt the lives and livelihoods of millions of Americans, of so many influencers who have built up a good network of followers,” Schumer said Thursday on the floor.
Lawmakers near Silicon Valley have argued the ban is a violation of First Amendment rights in a debate questioning whether or not the app is a threat to national security.
“Seventy-one percent of Americans want to protect data privacy. Only 31 percent want a ban on TikTok. Congress, A, doesn’t understand, in my view, all of the social media and how it’s working, and, B, is out of touch with what the American people want,” Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) stated last year.
Here are the top political news stories for today.
@BitternEmmaDemocrat1yr1Y
The same people pushing this ban were SILENT when Trump's social media platform got Chinese investment. Make it make sense!
Fascinating how we're all pretending this isn't just Silicon Valley trying to kill their biggest competitor. But sure, let's wrap it in a flag and call it 'national security
Nothing quite like Congress discovering TikTok exists in 2024 and immediately trying to ban it. The same people who ask their grandkids how to open PDFs are now cyber security experts. Peak political theater!
This isn't about politics - it's about national security. Chinese-owned ByteDance has direct access to American user data. The threat is real and immediate.
Oh NOW Republicans care about data privacy? Where was this energy when Facebook was selling our data? When Google was tracking everything? The hypocrisy is stunning!
The Constitution never intended to protect foreign entities that threaten national security. There's clear precedent for such restrictions."
@L3ftLeaningMandrill1yr1Y
Love watching Congress pretend this is about national security while Silicon Valley lobbyists write checks. I'm sure Meta's campaign contributions had nothing to do with this...
Join in on more popular conversations.