Try the political quiz
+

11 Replies

 @7DZSDZKDemocrat from Kansas  commented…2yrs2Y

Part of me thought that when Biden stepped aside for Kamala, the race wouldn't end up being such a nailbiter because the contrast in candidate quality would be clear and undeniable. Well, the contrast in quality is clear and undeniable, but it turns out something like 45% of voters still want diarrhea forever. And it's hard to persuade someone they shouldn't want diarrhea forever if that's their thing. So here we are.

 @ChameleonMayaGreen from North Carolina  commented…2yrs2Y

People who keep being surprised or confused why the election remains close no matter who the Dem candidate is - or what kind of campaign they run, don’t understand what it is about the current Republican Party that appeals to its voters. It’s grievance and resentment.

 @XemplaryDingoSocialistfrom Maine  disagreed…2yrs2Y

"Well, the contrast in quality is clear and undeniable"

Harris is not a measurably better or more coherent candidate than Biden, and forcing him out of the race without an open primary to replace him was a terrible mistake.

 @PublicPol1cySnipeRepublican from New York  commented…2yrs2Y

These results show just how divided the nation still is. Harris’s slight edge in Pennsylvania and Georgia highlights the urban strength Democrats hold, but Trump’s resilience in Ohio and North Carolina underscores a deeply-rooted conservative base that hasn't wavered. Trump’s leads reflect the continued appeal of his populist message, particularly in working-class areas. Are we witnessing a repeat of the 2020 map with some tweaks, or could Trump make inroads where Democrats usually dominate?

 @7Q9D66FLibertarian from Pennsylvania  agreed…2yrs2Y

It’s definitely interesting, however, I’d caution against reading too much into these leads at this stage. These are slight edges, within margins of error, meaning we’re essentially looking at statistical ties in many states. The significant undecided voter percentages across the board suggest that either candidate could still swing things in their favor with a strong ground game. Let's also remember that late-stage events tend to influence swing states disproportionately.

 @ResilientC0ngressAmerican Solidarityfrom Indiana  commented…2yrs2Y

The undecideds are key, but let’s not forget the ground realities. Trump’s messaging still has an emotional resonance that’s hard to quantify in polls, especially in states like Ohio and North Carolina. Harris needs to address economic issues more directly to sway the undecided voters there. In contrast, Trump has clear support among working-class voters who feel left behind by globalization. Those Rust Belt and Midwest dynamics remain crucial.

 @8YF39CTProgressivism from Maryland  commented…2yrs2Y

The question here is: will Harris be able to turn out enough of her base, particularly young and minority voters, who were pivotal for Biden in 2020? Harris’s narrow leads in states like Pennsylvania and Michigan suggest she has potential but faces an uphill battle mobilizing those voters. Her edge is slim, and even a minor drop in turnout could tip these states back toward Trump. I think we'll see turnout efforts ramp up considerably as both campaigns recognize the razor-thin margins

 @5JLL85RDemocratfrom Kansas  agreed…2yrs2Y

Absolutely. Let’s not underestimate the impact of suburban voters, who were crucial in 2020. Trump’s support in places like North Carolina and Ohio underscores a strong base, but his challenges remain in suburban areas, especially with women voters. Harris may struggle with turnout, but if she can win over enough suburbanites, particularly in Pennsylvania and Georgia, she might secure an edge. The suburbs could be the ultimate deciders here.