Progressivism

I just feel like everybody should have a voice about each individuals situation to progress further in each community.

Giving all Americans the opportunity to express their opinions

I think what is good for future generations is good for the present. We will, or our children will, eventually be around to benefit. We need to play more for the future than the here and now.

How money is distributed and prices because for the poor people or low income, it is almost impossible to change or make it be the opposite.
I think it would give people far more chances in life and success than what there already is.

racial justice so that people could be treated fairly

I stand on the side of offering as many rights to an individual person as possible un-impeded.

I believe that balancing individual rights needs to be placed before the common good of a progressive society.

I value progressivism with a Donald trump point of view

For those people who wants to vote should vote because not everyone not want something

The limitation of romance, homo, or heterosexual in ant child media should be a world standard to prevent child sexual abuse and exploitation.

Treating All Citizens Fairly,helping local,and state Coummunities

teach children about equality
stand up for someone
model self care

Take some time to account for the fact that we're all human beings at the end of the day and that we all are entitled to the same natural rights.

Slavery and women's sufferage were two of the most important and life-changing events at the beginning of our nation.

The progressivism of the early twentieth century. We need to get back to the trust busting and monopoly toppling of Roosevelt, Taft, and Wilson.

I think it is a big part of a progressive future but it should be achieved naturally instead of inflating diversity through media because that just skews reality and makes the united states seem more diverse than it is.

I think it is very iportant to include everyone as we are. We are all human.

1. The Industrial Revolution and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race. They
have greatly increased the life-expectancy of those of us who live in “advanced” countries, but
they have destabilized society, have made life unfulfilling, have subjected human beings to
indignities, have led to widespread psychological suffering (in the Third World to physical
suffering as well) and have inflicted severe damage on the natural world. The continued
development of technology will worsen the situation. It will certainly subject human beings to
greater indignities and infl…  Read moreict greater damage on the natural world, it will probably lead to greater
social disruption and psychological suffering, and it may lead to increased physical suffering even
in “advanced” countries.
2. The industrial-technological system may survive or it may break down. If it survives, it may
eventually achieve a low level of physical and psychological suffering, but only after passing
through a long and very painful period of adjustment and only at the cost of permanently reducing
human beings and many other living organisms to engineered products and mere cogs in the social
machine. Furthermore, if the system survives, the consequences will be inevitable: There is no
way of reforming or modifying the system so as to prevent it from depriving people of dignity and
autonomy.
3. If the system breaks down the consequences will still be very painful. But the bigger the system
grows the more disastrous the results of its breakdown will be, so if it is to break down it had best
break down sooner rather than later.
4. We therefore advocate a revolution against the industrial system. This revolution may or may
not make use of violence; it may be sudden or it may be a relatively gradual process spanning a
few decades. We can’t predict any of that. But we do outline in a very general way the measures
that those who hate the industrial system should take in order to prepare the way for a revolution
against that form of society. This is not to be a political revolution. Its object will be to overthrow
not governments but the economic and technological basis of the present society.
5. In this article we give attention to only some of the negative developments that have grown out
of the industrial-technological system. Other such developments we mention only briefly or
ignore altogether. This does not mean that we regard these other developments as
2
unimportant. For practical reasons we have to confine our discussion to areas that have received
insufficient public attention or in which we have something new to say. For example, since there
are well-developed environmental and wilderness movements, we have written very little about
environmental degradation or the destruction of wild nature, even though we consider these to be
highly important.
THE PSYCHOLOGY OF MODERN LEFTISM
6. Almost everyone will agree that we live in a deeply troubled society. One of the most
widespread manifestations of the craziness of our world is leftism, so a discussion of the
psychology of leftism can serve as an introduction to the discussion of the problems of modern
society in general.
7. But what is leftism? During the first half of the 20th century leftism could have been practically
identified with socialism. Today the movement is fragmented and it is not clear who can properly
be called a leftist. When we speak of leftists in this article we have in mind mainly socialists,
collectivists, “politically correct” types, feminists, gay and disability activists, animal rights
activists and the like. But not everyone who is associated with one of these movements is a
leftist. What we are trying to get at in discussing leftism is not so much movement or an ideology
as a psychological type, or rat

In the long run, we can view the gap in class and how it changes as well as the incarceration rate

I think the way we as Americans treat immigrants, is that they are aliens and dont have blood running through their veins and a heart pumping in their chest just like us.

Environmental protection is central to progressivism because it speaks to having an appreciation for the environment and a sense of human obligation in doing what we can do to preserve the environment for generations to come.

Environmental protection is something all can agree on. However, the kind of policies proposed by progressives are without benefit, and massively counterproductive. Carbon labels in the earth's atmosphere are almost completely unaffected by industrial burning, and are not significantly responsible for the earth's heat retention. The vast majority of the greenhouse effect is achieved by water vapor. Climate change alarmists are completely without basis for their predictions of disaster, which always turn out to be wrong. And there is nothing that wastes more resources than climate…  Read more change legislation, which costs trillions of dollars in taxes, production costs, and government grants. Moreover, many climate change initiatives are environmentally destructive, such as strip mining for rare earth minerals to be used in electric car batteries, or clearing thousands of acres of land to build a wind farm, which only produces the energy equivalent of one oil derrick, which can be established on very little land.

Many speakers of the white house like Kamala Harris made me think about social reform.

Sam Sulek has drove me to work out more intensely to get stronger

I think Abraham Lincoln or Jacob Riis as progressive, because they both helped make life better for millions of individuals.

The change towards women sufferage and being treated the same as men.

No, I think we should align to the constitution as it was written

No, progressivism is the continued evolution of a country and its ability to continue giving its citizens protections and services.

One major benefit of progressivism in the workplace is increasing equal opportunities and inclusion.

a better re- distribution of wealth and better implementation of laws with out special privilege