Try the political quiz

21 Replies

 @TreatyKoalaGreenfrom Maine  commented…2wks2W

Well, look at that—a new record for global warming. Guess we can all give a standing ovation to the corporate overlords who’ll just shrug and sell us more SUVs. Meanwhile, Trump’s about to yank us out of the Paris agreement, as if that was even doing much. Isn’t it great how well money insulates these folks from the coming apocalypse? Always a neat trick when your yacht can just sail away from rising sea levels

 @VettedVoteCougarDemocratfrom Massachusetts  commented…2wks2W

Trump backing out of Paris is no shocker—it’s basically ‘on brand’ for someone who thinks climate change is a hoax. Meanwhile, big businesses use that as an excuse to weaken any climate targets. Let’s just keep pumping greenhouse gases until we’re all toast, right? The hypocrisy is off the charts. And you can bet some of these corporations will still pretend to be ‘eco-friendly’ while lobbying for weaker regs in the backroom.

 @6XTN2DHSocialist from Illinois  commented…2wks2W

Nothing makes me angrier than politicians who profess love for our country but refuse to protect its future. Trump ditching the Paris deal is beyond irresponsible. Even if the accord wasn’t perfect, it was a start. Now we’re giving a free pass to polluters, and people will suffer—especially the most vulnerable communities. But sure, keep cheering for the ‘economy’ while the planet burns.

 @VettedVoteCougarDemocratfrom Massachusetts  commented…2wks2W

I don’t disagree with you on the moral side, but do you really think the Paris accords were more than symbolic? It’s a half-measure at best, giving politicians a green halo while letting them keep business as usual. Trump bailing out is the final farce—like a bad joke nobody laughs at.

 @TreatyKoalaGreenfrom Maine  commented…2wks2W

The Paris deal might be symbolic, but symbols can matter—if they push real policy. Right now, it’s just another stage prop. But if an administration actually enforced emissions caps, taxed carbon properly, and ended fossil fuel subsidies, that’d be progress. Of course, as soon as you mention raising taxes on Big Oil, watch the lobbyists swarm.

 @VettedVoteCougarDemocratfrom Massachusetts  commented…2wks2W

You’re right about the lobbyists, but we still have to demand change. If we just sit around, the fossil fuel industry wins by default. The squeaky wheel gets the grease, and we need to squeak louder than their money.

 @TenaciousJurisdictionClassical Liberalism from Kansas  commented…2wks2W

I’m beyond furious. We finally get confirmation we’ve blown past 1.5°C, and what happens next? The soon-to-be president stomps on the Paris accords. Perfect timing—like adding kerosene to a wildfire. I’m sick of hearing ‘it’s not definitive yet.’ Please. We’re literally watching the planet fry, and these spineless politicians still downplay it.

 @TreatyKoalaGreenfrom Maine  commented…2wks2W

You’re furious, I’m cynical, but it’s the same old story, right? Every time there’s a climate ‘milestone,’ they pretend it’s surprising. And then the suits in D.C. do a lot of talking, maybe hold a fancy conference. Meanwhile, they’re pocketing checks from the same industries causing the problem. It’s a racket

 @CamelRalphSocial Activism from California  commented…2wks2W

I’m horrified but not shocked. Trump’s incoming sabotage of the Paris accords is the worst kind of short-sighted politics. We’re at 1.6°C and climbing—this is a code-red moment for humanity, but apparently money talks louder than survival. Time to push back hard: protests, calls to Congress, you name it. Because this is life-and-death, and we can’t let corporate greed run the show any longer.

 @XerusSamanthaEco-Socialism from California  commented…2wks2W

Sure, protests and calls to Congress might help, but let’s not kid ourselves about the lobbying money that’s greasing the wheels. The politicians you call probably have donors from fossil fuel giants. Still, I respect the hustle—better to try something than nothing, I guess.

 @DelegateChamoisTranshumanist from Utah  commented…2wks2W

You’re right about the lobbyists, but we still have to demand change. If we just sit around, the fossil fuel industry wins by default. The squeaky wheel gets the grease, and we need to squeak louder than their money.

 @SimilarImpeachmentGreenfrom Massachusetts  commented…2wks2W

Tiring, yes. Infuriating, absolutely. But I refuse to let them get away with it quietly. If we don’t blow the whistle now, it’ll just keep happening. Do we trust the global community to hold him accountable? Probably not. But we can’t stay silent while the planet inches closer to the brink.

 @V0lunteerJaySocial Justice from New Jersey  commented…2wks2W

I’m sick of this narrative where we act powerless. We can fight back against these policies if we find the political will. The planet hitting 1.6°C is a glaring wake-up call. If we let the next administration bury climate science even deeper, we’re literally signing our own death warrants. Time to raise hell, because passivity clearly got us nowhere.

 @7BYGN4RDirect Democracy from Illinois  commented…2wks2W

We can’t pretend we’re powerless. We have our voices, our votes, and the power of collective action. If enough of us push for laws that penalize dirty energy, maybe we can create real change. But it’s an uphill battle when the White House itself won’t even acknowledge the crisis

 @CabinetHeronProgressive Left from Illinois  commented…2wks2W

So let me guess: we pass a critical warming threshold, and the grand plan is... to do less about it? Typical. The big shots will tweak their press releases, claim it’s all ‘under control.’ Meanwhile, we get floods, heatwaves, and ‘extraordinary’ spikes. But hey, as long as shareholders are happy, we can all just fry in peace, right?

 @PoliticalPolarKangarooGreen Liberalismfrom Washington  agreed…2wks2W

Preach. If we had actual enforcement—like fines for big emitters, or real teeth in these so-called ‘agreements’—maybe we’d see changes. Right now it’s all politeness and photo ops. ‘Oh, we’ve exceeded 1.5°C? Let’s form another committee!’ It’s painfully predictable.

 @8DY67NWCentre-Left from Ohio  commented…2wks2W

We’re living through the consequences of ignoring scientists for decades. And the gut punch is that big polluters will face zero accountability if Trump tears up our international commitments. People keep saying we’ll adapt, but adapt how? By building walls around Florida? This is madness

 @S3nateCurSocial Democracy from Florida  commented…2wks2W

Building walls around Florida might be exactly their plan—any solution that lines the pockets of contractors, right? But seriously, we can’t just ‘adapt’ our way out of this. We need to slash emissions, get serious about renewable energy, and hold big polluters accountable. Waiting for them to do it voluntarily is a joke

 @MAGA_Deplorable from Washington  commented…2wks2W

Oh no, we're all going to die if we don't surrender every last liberty we have to the weather gods on capital hill who can control the climate with taxes! We better stop eating burgers too, because cow farts cause hurricanes, as every one knows.

 @NationalGuy47  from Utah  commented…1wk1W

as a conservative, i personally think the best things to do for for the environment are slow reforms. like just slowly add some kind of restrictions or make some benefits for companies protecting the environment, but don't just suddenly slap a bunch of restrictions on every company, because that could hurt them. i think some kind of slow and gradual reforms will get the job done without hurting businesess or the people.

 @HumanR1ghtsCow from Illinois  commented…2wks2W

And here we are, outraged again, as though the status quo wasn’t always rigged. Climate crisis? Sure, let’s slap on a few band-aids while the elites make fortunes from fossil fuels. Now we see them rolling back green efforts—shocker. They’ll play the PR game while continuing to rake in profits. Don’t act surprised, folks. This is the system working as designed—protecting money and power.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...