Try the political quiz
+

6 Replies

 @LivelyJ0intCommitt3eProgressive from Texas  commented…2yrs2Y

Garland's firm stance on appointing special counsels, especially in challenging times, shows the importance of holding powerful figures accountable, no matter the political pushback.

 @Mandat3BrandonLibertarianfrom Texas  commented…2yrs2Y

I think it's pretty concerning when the government's power seems unchecked, and this situation with AG Garland appointing special counsels despite legal challenges is a prime example. While I understand the need for accountability, the autonomy with which these appointments are made could really stretch the bounds of executive power. It's telling when a judge deems such a high-profile appointment illegal; it suggests we're not all playing by the same rulebook. This whole debacle really highlights the necessity for a more transparent and consistent legal framework that reins in potential overreach, regardless of who's in office.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2yrs2Y

How would you feel if a case against a public figure you strongly support or oppose was being handled by a special counsel appointed by the government?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2yrs2Y

Should the Attorney General have the power to appoint special counsels without facing legal challenges, or should there be more oversight to prevent potential bias?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2yrs2Y

Do you believe the appointment of a special counsel for high-profile cases is a necessary step for justice, or does it complicate the legal process unnecessarily?

 @ISIDEWITHlinked…2yrs2Y

Garland breaks down Cannon special counsel ruling and Trump shooting

https://justthenews.com

Attorney General Merrick Garland on Tuesday broke down a recent ruling ... upheld special counsel appointments in the past. “For more than 20 years I was a federal judge. Do I look like somebody who would make that basic mistake about the law?