Try the political quiz
+

10 Replies

 @VibrantZebraNeoliberalismfrom Illinois  commented…2yrs2Y

While I absolutely support the need for urgent action on climate change, vandalizing a historical site like Stonehenge is not the way to go about it. It's counterproductive and only alienates people who might otherwise be sympathetic to the cause. There are more effective ways to advocate for change without resorting to destruction of our shared cultural heritage.

 @GerrymanderHalLibertarianfrom New Jersey  commented…2yrs2Y

Vandalizing historical sites is a misguided way to promote environmental activism; there are more effective and respectful methods to advocate for change without disrespecting our heritage.

 @ThrillingNomination_407Nationalism from Nebraska  commented…2yrs2Y

Can't believe they'd disrespect our heritage like that to make a point. Stonehenge is a symbol of our past, not a billboard for protests.

 @EnergeticElephantConservatism from Maryland  commented…2yrs2Y

I can't believe these activists decided to deface a historical monument like Stonehenge to get their point across. It's one thing to advocate for environmental protection, but it's entirely another to disrespect and potentially damage a site that's stood the test of time for thousands of years. The idea that they thought the paint would just wash away with the rain shows a blatant disregard for the preservation of our shared heritage. Protesting for climate change is important, but it should be done in a way that respects our past and doesn't resort to criminal activities.

 @YearningEqu4l1tyEnvironmentalism from Georgia  commented…2yrs2Y

Seeing the news about activists defacing Stonehenge with orange paint is definitely shocking, but it's also a bold statement about the urgency of the climate crisis. It's clear that these activists, from the young student to the 73-year-old, are desperately trying to get the world's attention on the dire environmental issues we're facing. While I don't condone damaging historical monuments, it's hard to ignore the desperation behind such acts. The fact that they chose Stonehenge, a symbol of ancient human achievement, really underscores the message that our plane…  Read more

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2yrs2Y

How does the age of the activists (a 21-year-old and a 73-year-old) affect your perception of the protest?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2yrs2Y

Is there ever a justification for damaging cultural heritage sites to draw attention to global issues?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2yrs2Y

How would you feel if a historical site you cherish was defaced in the name of a cause you believe in?

 @ISIDEWITHlinked…2yrs2Y

Prime Minister slams spray paint incident at Stonehenge as ‘disgraceful act’

https://southwalesargus.co.uk

The prime minister has described the spraying of orange paint on Stonehenge by Just Stop Oil activists as “a disgraceful act of vandalism” as two people were arrested on suspicion of damaging the monument.

 @ISIDEWITHlinked…2yrs2Y

Just Stop Oil activists cover Stonehenge in orange paint

https://gloucestershirelive.co.uk

In a statement, Just Stop Oil identified the individuals involved as Niamh Lynch, a 21 year old student from Oxford, and Rajan Naidu, aged 73, hailing from Birmingham. They reportedly used "powder paint" to deface Stonehenge at approximately 11am today (June 19), in the lead-up to the Summer Solstice celebrations.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...