Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

49.5k Replies

 @8PJK7LN from California  answered…5yrs5Y

 @9D9KS9H from Indiana  answered…2yrs2Y

 @95WKB43 from Washington  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8TKMJXN from New Hampshire  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8RFCY6DSocialist from California  answered…4yrs4Y

 @9X37L9GIndependent  from Utah  answered…7mos7MO

Gov. should require universities to create a sliding scale tuition rate for students based on their parents income (ages 18-26) or the adult student (27 and up)

 @9RCGB7L from Washington  answered…11mos11MO

Lower interest on student loans, more scholarships, and High-demand professions should have subsidized tuition available.

 @9QS5BKYNo Labels from Massachusetts  answered…11mos11MO

I believe that they should limit how exhorbitantly expensive getting such an education can be, rather than paying for it themselves.

 @9J2HGL3Independent from New York  answered…1yr1Y

Low interest rates and incentivized borrowing caused this mess. Now pricing is way too high. Regulate price increases.

 @9FQYRHJ from New York  answered…2yrs2Y

The federal goverment should pay for tuition at public universities (2 or 4 year), but not private universities.

 @9DRGJXN from Pennsylvania  answered…2yrs2Y

 @96P82QB from Iowa  answered…3yrs3Y

 @96DM87V from Texas  answered…3yrs3Y

 @95VK5Y5 from Arizona  answered…3yrs3Y

 @95TFYSZDemocrat from Massachusetts  answered…3yrs3Y

Public colleges should be free Private colleges should not be so expensive and student loans should have no interest

 @95R8HCVSocialist from Colorado  answered…3yrs3Y

 @95NT2VJ from California  answered…3yrs3Y

 @94SBXBJ from Nebraska  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, at a dollar amount per student (partial tuition if the total is above this amount) while providing an incentive for state or community colleges and reducing lower interest rates for student loans.

 @94K8HFH from Florida  answered…3yrs3Y

In my opinion, education should have a low cost or could even be free. If you give people the liberty of attending school for free, the will feel motivated to do so. Then, you will have an educated population and that will bring many good things.

 @94DTTWS from Louisiana  answered…3yrs3Y

 @944QSRP from North Carolina  answered…3yrs3Y

 @942HVN2 from Michigan  answered…3yrs3Y

 @93SBJTQ from Texas  answered…3yrs3Y

 @93RVK2G from North Carolina  answered…3yrs3Y

 @93RG86FWomen’s Equality from Missouri  answered…3yrs3Y

No, but public universities should be limited on their tuition, and more scholarships should be available for low-income students.

 @93GN2VM from California  answered…3yrs3Y

There should be more scholarships provided that are easier to apply for.

 @934N3KJ from New York  answered…3yrs3Y

 @92QMWVDSocialist from Georgia  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but tuition should be lowered by stripping out noneducational areas of the campus such as stadiums.

 @92N48G6 from Louisiana  answered…3yrs3Y

I think for lower income they should provide tuition and for low to medium income more scholarships

 @925YYFX from Michigan  answered…3yrs3Y

The tuition element should be completely removed from public colleges. Education should be a democratic and collaborative process.

 @8ZQFRL3Democrat from Maryland  answered…3yrs3Y

They should pay college tutions for low income students, and people who can't afford it

 @8ZMCPYV from California  answered…3yrs3Y

i think the government should be in charge of making sure were able to go to college, it's very important and it's not for nothing.

 @8ZH5RB3Progressive from Massachusetts  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, for public institutions, and they should control the cost of higher education.

 @8ZCQ8KLIndependent from Massachusetts  answered…3yrs3Y

First of all, Universities should not be run like country clubs. This greatly inflates the administrative costs of Higher Education. This is why, in general, most private universities cost more than public universities. The next step is to give uniform room, board, and meals to everyone living on campus, barring allergies, of course. Then, separate the remaining costs that are incurred with respect to teaching students and the costs that are incurred with respect to research. The government and/or the corporations that benefit from said research should pay for that research, and the students…  Read more

 @8Z9R2TLSocialist from Texas  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but for lower-income students, wealthy students should be able to pay for tuition

 @8Z5J6Z9 from Oklahoma  answered…3yrs3Y

I think community collage should be free so you can get you Associate degree and if you want a higher education that should fall on you

 @8YYHNQP from Indiana  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8YPD972 from Georgia  answered…3yrs3Y

Control the price for higher education. It's way too expensive and shouldn't be a business.

 @8YLSYYP from Alabama  answered…3yrs3Y

Partial tuition and providing more scholarship opportunities for low-income students

 @8YLGHS4 from New Jersey  answered…3yrs3Y

There should be colleges that are free, accessible, and universally accepted. The government should pay for the schools, not the tuitions.

 @8YBPLV2 from Illinois  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8Y96NBV from California  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but for families that actually need the aid. Families that make more than enough money to pay for their children’s education would just be pocketing more wealth, while low income families wouldn’t be able to attain that wealth at all.

 @8Y7YY7J from Minnesota  answered…3yrs3Y

yes, but only for the basic level and If you fail a class you pay to retake it

 @8Y4SBQB from New Jersey  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8XYLW3C from Texas  answered…3yrs3Y

No, the federal government should put a cap on how much universities can charge. Having the federal government guarantee payment will only encourage universities to raise their prices further.

 @8XS8WYC from Washington  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8XNTT4Y from Pennsylvania  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8X6MR84 from Minnesota  answered…4yrs4Y

No, but Community Colleges and Trade schools should be tuition free and subsidized by the Federal Government.

 @8WZMWX2 from Ohio  answered…4yrs4Y

The wording is awfully biased on this question? Yes there should be federal tax dollars going to universities and colleges to allow tuition free education. But that doesn't mean the government is paying for it. It's an investment the American people are making.

 @8WR25MPDemocrat from New York  answered…4yrs4Y

For all lower income families and middle class families with certain qualifications

 @8WQCRXT from Florida  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8WLHZ6F from North Carolina  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8WJKK52Socialist from New Jersey  answered…4yrs4Y

yes, for qualified low income students that meet the scholastic requirements

 @8WHKJHT from Washington D.C.  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8W4C227Socialist from Alaska  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8VXS6QXDemocrat from Texas  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but only for low-income students, who couldn't afford to take out a loan

 @8VTPJ5QSocialist from Texas  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, for public colleges and universities. No need to pay Harvard 100k/year

 @8VKG43J from Connecticut  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8VJVYMT from Massachusetts  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8V63NZH from Georgia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8TR9F28 from Massachusetts  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but it’s a tricky subject. This shouldn’t be a communist country but college should be affordable and for the poor it should be practically free.

 @8TMRMY2 from Maryland  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8TGYS7V from Indiana  answered…4yrs4Y

Federal government should pay for tuition at public four-year colleges and universities, and pay partial tuition for private institutions.

 @8TC9672Progressive from Georgia  answered…4yrs4Y

Absolutely, we are one of the few highly industrialized nations without some form of state sponsored higher education

 @8TC58M8 from New York  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8T9Z5R5 from North Carolina  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8T9H44Y from Illinois  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8T7CMB4 from Mississippi  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8T4W54B from New York  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8T4PW6NDemocrat from North Carolina  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes and no because I feel that if you have a higher income or you in the 1% you should pay for it yourself and those with lower income shouldn’t have too.

 @8T277GG from Oklahoma  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8SZ4S2PDemocrat from Massachusetts  answered…4yrs4Y

I'm still unsure about my position on this issue. I'm inclined to leave this issue to the states, but the Federal Government needs to be proactive in lowering college costs and student debt.

 @8SYSW29 from Ohio  answered…4yrs4Y

not all 4 years but at least 2 years so students can get a job and save up for the last 2 years

 @8SSX9GB from California  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, there should be a free public option but paid universities can still exist

 @8SM6GM6 from Texas  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8SKHJLS from Tennessee  answered…4yrs4Y

No, but the price should be lowered substantially so that the average person could afford it.

 @8SKF9GH from Ohio  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8SHHPMX from New Jersey  answered…4yrs4Y

Community college should be free and state universities should be less expensive for in state residents

 @8SFS82N from Oklahoma  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes but if the recipient doesn't graduate, they owe every penny they got in assistance unless they qualify for a hardship exception

 @8SFDVVXIndependent from Florida  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, have a universal standard where every person is provided the opportunity for higher education.

 @8S8QQXFDemocrat from Texas  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8S7NKT9 from Texas  answered…4yrs4Y

The government should guide you on what course you take, if you take a government guided course then they should pay.

 @8S7D65P from Maryland  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8S76PLYWomen’s Equality from Ohio  answered…4yrs4Y