Try the political quiz
@5BMY978AnswersSocial IssuesLGBT Adoption RightsStarted 4yrs agoActive 4wks ago

Yes, gay couples statistically have more stable families

Possible misinformation

5 readers have requested references for the claims made in this message. Would you like to help verify or debunk the author’s claims by providing references?

VerifyDebunk

8 Replies

  @Patriot-#1776Constitution from Washington  disagreed…8mos8MO

Gay couples can't have "families" because a family, by definition, is a man and a woman bound in marriage with children. It is not a man and a man or a woman and a woman, or a transvestite lunatic and a transvestite lunatic.

 @9TQ58SM from Virginia  disagreed…6mos6MO

Hi! What about if a spouse dies? There would no longer be both a man and a woman. Would you take the child away from the living parent just because they cannot be seen as a family within your definition of the word? Or, if a woman were to become pregnant and the father chooses to not be involved, are the woman and her child not a family of their own? I see some flaws in your logic.

  @Renaldo-MoonGreen  from Pennsylvania  commented…5mos5MO

Expert LGBT Adoption Rights

Wtf are you yapping about? Trans people are not lunatics and try updating your terminology from "transvestite."

Also look up family in any dictionary. Fun fact the Bibles not a dictionary, its a holy book.

 @9ZQTS63 from North Carolina  disagreed…3mos3MO

I hope you never have kids!

 @9N6W4T2 from Missouri  disagreed…9mos9MO

Source?

 @994HTZCIndependent from Illinois  disagreed…6mos6MO

#1 Expert LGBT Adoption Rights

Yes they might statistically have more stable families but it's just best that children have a mom and dad parent structure because it's just simply better for their mental health.

 @9NHNZLW from Ohio  agreed…9mos9MO

Not sure however they should have the same chances as a straight couple to adopt.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...

About this author

Learn more about the author that submitted this answer.

@5BMY978

Last activeActivity1 discussionsInfluence1 engagementsEngagement bias2%Audience bias3%Active in
LGBT Adoption Rights  1 Answers  1 Social Issues  1
PartyUndeclaredLocationMinneapolis, MN

More conversations

Join in on more popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…4mos4MO

Dark Money Moves: Bloomberg’s Quiet $50M Bet on Harris Amid Billionaire Arm-Twisting

Michael R. Bloomberg, the former mayor of New York City, under extraordinary pressure from friends and fellow billionaires to do more to help Vice President Kamala Harris, recently donated about $50 million to a nonprofit organization that is supporting her presidential run, according to four people with knowledge of the matter.The donation followed months of arm-twisting from associates such as Bill Gates, investor Ron Conway and Reid Hoffman, the co-founder of LinkedIn. Mr. Bloomberg recently spoke with Ms. Harris in a private phone call, according to two people briefed on the conversation.Mr. Bloomberg’s decision conforms to a strategy that has become his trademark: Confounding Democratic operatives by refusing to make early investments — only to come in hot and heavy in the homestretch. But unlike his previous big gifts, this one was intended to be kept under wraps, and that secrecy has made unaware Democrats more anxious than they have been most autumns.His contribution was made to Future Forward USA Action, the dark-money vehicle of Future Forward, Ms. Harris’s main super PAC.Mr. Bloomberg, who is 82 years old and has an estimated net worth of $105 billion, is the second largest disclosed individual donor to Democrats in this election cycle, after the investor and philanthropist George Soros. But publicly, Democrats observed that Mr. Bloomberg was donating nowhere close to what he had spent during the presidency of Donald J. Trump.The $47 million he had given in federally disclosed political contributions during this election cycle, before his new nonprofit donation, was less than half of the $95 million he disclosed to help Democrats retake Congress in the 2018 midterms.And so in recent months, frustrated Democrats in his close orbit had urged him to consider a large donation to help Ms. Harris in an election expected to be decided by razor-thin margins. Mr. Bloomberg’s advisers, to say nothing of the man himself, have fielded jittery queries for months about what Democrats saw as his relatively conspicuous absence.

▲  611 replies

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…5mos5MO

Mystery Drones Swarm a U.S. Military Bases

U.S. Air Force Gen. Mark Kelly wasn’t sure what to make of reports that a suspicious fleet of unidentified aircraft had been flying over Langley Air Force Base on Virginia’s shoreline.Kelly, a decorated senior commander at the base, got on a squadron rooftop to see for himself. He joined a handful of other officers responsible for a clutch of the nation’s most advanced jet fighters, including F-22 Raptors. For several nights, military personnel had reported a mysterious breach of restricted airspace over a stretch of land that has one of the largest concentrations of national-security facilities in the U.S. The show usually starts 45 minutes to an hour after sunset, another senior leader told Kelly.Officials didn’t know if the drone fleet, which numbered as many as a dozen or more over the following nights, belonged to clever hobbyists or hostile forces. Some suspected that Russia or China deployed them to test the response of American forces.Federal law prohibits the military from shooting down drones near military bases in the U.S. unless they pose an imminent threat. Aerial snooping doesn’t qualify, though some lawmakers hope to give the military greater leeway.Reports of the drones reached President Biden and set off two weeks of White House meetings after the aircraft first appeared in December last year. Officials from agencies including the Defense Department, Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Pentagon’s UFO office joined outside experts to throw out possible explanations as well as ideas about how to respond.The first drone arrived shortly. Kelly, a career fighter pilot, estimated it was roughly 20 feet long and flying at more than 100 miles an hour, at an altitude of roughly 3,000 to 4,000 feet. Other drones followed, one by one, sounding in the distance like a parade of lawn mowers.The drones headed south, across Chesapeake Bay, toward Norfolk, Va., and over an area that includes the home base for the Navy’s SEAL Team Six and Naval Station Norfolk, the world’s largest naval port.

▲  289 replies