Try the political quiz
 @Patriot-#1776ConstitutionDisagreementsStarted 12mos agoActive 5mos ago

Gay couples can't have "families" because a family, by definition, is a man and a woman bound in marriage with children

It is not a man and a man or a woman and a woman, or a transvestite lunatic and a transvestite lunatic.

4 Replies

 @9TQ58SM from Virginia  disagreed…10mos10MO

Hi! What about if a spouse dies? There would no longer be both a man and a woman. Would you take the child away from the living parent just because they cannot be seen as a family within your definition of the word? Or, if a woman were to become pregnant and the father chooses to not be involved, are the woman and her child not a family of their own? I see some flaws in your logic.

  @Renaldo-MoonGreen  from Pennsylvania  commented…9mos9MO

Expert LGBT Adoption Rights

Wtf are you yapping about? Trans people are not lunatics and try updating your terminology from "transvestite."

Also look up family in any dictionary. Fun fact the Bibles not a dictionary, its a holy book.

 @9ZQTS63 from North Carolina  disagreed…7mos7MO

I hope you never have kids!

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...

About this author

Learn more about the author that submitted this disagreement.

@Patriot-#1776

Last activeActivity1,934 discussionsInfluence1 engagementsEngagement bias99%Audience bias37%Active in
Comments  1255 Disagreements  371 Answers  172 Agreements  66 URLs  32
PartyConstitutionLocationUnknown

More conversations

Join in on more popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…12mos12MO

“Throw out everything you thought you knew about this election.”

By Chuck Todd, NBC News:We are getting awfully close to the moment when it might be fair to say, “Throw out everything you thought you knew about this election.”We are now going from a presidential campaign that left the public disinterested and at times disgusted it to a campaign that I could see generating an electorate that might be as interested, if not more so, as in 2008 and 2020, two of the highest-turnout elections in the last 50 years.If the Democrats do end up with a new nominee — and it’s looking more likely by the hour that they will — that, too, is likely to suddenly trigger interest in what the new nominee has to say, which in turn could engage the electorate in a way that the pre-debate version of this campaign just didn’t.But before we get to this campaign reset, the Democrats have to figure out what their ticket looks like and, more important, how quickly they can get their ticket selected and certified by the party.As of this writing, my sources indicate to me that about the only folks who are still trying to rationalize Biden’s staying in this race all share the last name of Biden, with the possible exception of Biden’s longtime chief political strategist, Mike Donilon — who, as the gatekeeper of the data that makes it to the president's desk, is starting to get blame along with Biden and his family for Democrats’ being in this position.

▲  2015 replies