Try the political quiz

1.8k Replies

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...8yrs8Y

Yes

 @9FBKC2Z from Georgia agreed…12mos12MO

Top Agreement

I believe that police officers should have body cams. The main reason why I say this because they can be doing something wrong or illegal with the way they do their job. For example, if a police officer is beating a citizen with no reason they can get that on tape and it’s not just for citizens protection it’s also for the officers protection. There has been many officers who have been hurt by others and they should be protected as well. And I understand the job can be dangerous but they could use those body cams for Justice for them and the people in my opinion.

 @FreedomEli from Ohio disagreed…12mos12MO

You bring up some valid points regarding the use of body cameras for police accountability and officer safety. However, it's crucial to consider privacy concerns as well. For instance, body cameras often capture sensitive situations involving citizens in their most vulnerable moments, and the widespread access and potential misuse of this footage could lead to a breach of privacy. In San Francisco, for example, there were concerns about footage from body cameras being misused or ending up in the wrong hands. How would you propose we balance the need for transparency and accountability with the right to privacy?

  @Ars-Gratia-Artiscommented…7mos7MO

You're right, but it's not a reason not to have them. *Technically* no where in the constitution is an inalienable right to privacy mentioned, it's just somewhat respected. I mean, the cameras are useful, I don't think that should be denied, I just think what should be RELEASED should be vetted for safety to protect individuals involved who aren't cops.

 @9JVTPYX  from Florida disagreed…7mos7MO

consider privacy concerns as well. For instance, body cameras often capture sensitive situations involving citizens in their most vulnerable moments, and the widespread access and potential misuse of this footage could lead to a breach of privacy. In San Francisco, for example, there were concerns about footage from body cameras being misused or ending up in the wrong hands.

Majority of the time a police officers are on public property so that's like saying, sure you can't record via body cam but if you want to you can pull your phone out. About people being at their lowest point, to put it simply what does that have to do with the officers? their job is to protect and serve and if they can't protect you because they can use footage of a guy being murdered because of privacy concerns then that alone would raise a red flag. It doesn't matter where you are or might go there is going to be someone who miss uses something, this might something suc…  Read more

 @9F8MCCH from Nebraska agreed…12mos12MO

Cambridge University they discovered that the results of using body cameras resulted in an 88% decline in complaints against police officers and a 60% decline in police officers' use of force.

 @9FN622K from Ohio agreed…12mos12MO

If an officer or a citizen mistreats the other, or commits and offence towards the other, and there is no evidence to prove it, a bodycam shall act as a means to record evidence, and disprove any false claims if it reaches a court.

 @9F95F29Peace and Freedom from California agreed…12mos12MO

For example the clips released about George Floyd would never have existed if not for police body cams and therefore the reason of his death could have been covered up.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...8yrs8Y

Yes, this will protect the safety and rights of police officers and citizens

  @random17345  from North Carolina agreed…10mos10MO

"Cameras also protect police by providing evidence that they have made a legal arrest or stop and that they followed the proper protocol. Not only can body cameras help both citizens and police officers, they can also help to improve the relationship between them." from "Who Do Police Body Cameras Help?" on navalawez.com

 @9F76Q62Republican from Texas agreed…1yr1Y

If somebody you cared about was killed wrongfully you wouldn’t know because it be there word against yours

 @9M2KJ2C from Illinois agreed…4mos4MO

If there were no body cameras to view, it would be your word against an officer's word, making it almost unlikely you'd win the case. But with body cameras, it would show the truth and the truth alone, no manipulation or bribery. Body cameras are necessary to keep our society safe.

 @9L5TQ4M  from Pennsylvania agreed…6mos6MO

While I don't have much evidence, I do know that many people would perform crimes if they knew nobody was watching. Who's to stop a crooked cop from accepting bribes or abusing his power when the evidence the crime occurred doesn't exist? Plus they already have qualified immunity, to get rid of body cams is to give them way too much power.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...8yrs8Y

No

 @9FL2B54  from Oklahoma disagreed…12mos12MO

Body cameras should be worn at all times to make sure that police are being just and fair to citizens.

 @9FBKKLT  from Pennsylvania disagreed…12mos12MO

Top Disagreement

If all police were required to wear body cams, this would eliminate the question of misconduct and if it occurred and to get rid of the "he said she said" conflict.

 @9FF5C55  from Indiana agreed…12mos12MO

Yes, I agree with this. It is the same concept as having a dash cam. It eliminates questions that could be manipulated by a party with more apparent power.

 @PuzzledJ0intResolutionfrom Texas asked…12mos12MO

I'm thrilled to see your agreement here! You brought up an interesting comparison to dash cams. Could you share more about why you think dash cams and body cams share the same benefits?

 @9FF84MWPeace and Freedom from Indiana agreed…12mos12MO

I believe that by making every police officer wear a body cam, it greatly deduces any chance of improper use of authority or it could help prove innocence when a police officer goes over the line.

 @9FG9PKG from Texas agreed…12mos12MO

I agree. The lack of confirmed evidence that we have in many cases is what let's the police force get away with so much more than they should.

 @9FG8SSP from Pennsylvania agreed…12mos12MO

I agree with this comment. When police officers wear body cams it takes away from there being more cases about misconduct, and the "he said she said" conflict.

 @9F95F29Peace and Freedom from California disagreed…12mos12MO

Police should always carry body cams for both evidence of a crime and to make sure they aren’t doing anything suspicious themselves.

 @9GNTTF5  from Pennsylvania disagreed…10mos10MO

If police officers are following the law and have nothing to hide, there is no reason to oppose police body cameras.

 @9GNW3MDSocialist from New Jersey agreed…10mos10MO

I completely agree. Body cameras are good for both police officers and potential suspects; they protect both sides from false accusations.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...8yrs8Y

No, it should be a police department’s or officer’s choice to wear one

 @9FBFVSC from Tennessee disagreed…12mos12MO

Top Disagreement

All officers should wear a body camera for evidence whether it be against the officer or for the officer.

 @9F8MCCH from Nebraska disagreed…12mos12MO

Body Cameras are made to protect the Officer and the Department in cases of misconduct, it only makes you look bad if you do soemthing wrong.

 @9F8MGYB from Mississippi disagreed…12mos12MO

The officers who would choose not to wear body cameras are the ones we're worried about. The police are the violent enforcement arm of the government. They need to be surveilled in order to prevent the government from overstepping its bounds.

 @9F8YRB8 from Texas disagreed…12mos12MO

Without body cams no proof of either negative or positive conduct will be available to review our policemen. With body cameras, a safer police force is provided

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...8yrs8Y

Yes, but only for patrol officers in high crime areas

 @8XLR4JXDemocrat  from North Carolina answered…12mos12MO

Yes, and there should be clear consequences for tampering with the device’s footage.

 @56WTPKPfrom Vermont answered…4yrs4Y

No, police should be retrained to deescalate high-tension situations and react to dangerous suspects with less lethal force. The reason a criminal isn't afraid to shoot a cop is the same reason a soldier isn't afraid to shoot his opponent in battle. If you threaten another person with death, expect them to fight like hell to kill you first. Furthermore, police accused of abusing their power should be tried as if they never had a badge in the first place. Murder is murder regardless of who kills who.

 @8LXQB35 from Georgia answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, the cameras never lie. That would help keep officers out of prison and help a lot with the investigations.

 @Varsity1 from Texas commented…4mos4MO

I think the problem is that it would help put officers in prison more often.

 @5LDN8JLfrom Georgia answered…4yrs4Y

Yes but they should be able to be activated by dispatch officers, not the police officer.

 @5J4LQMBfrom Illinois answered…4yrs4Y

Yes!!! And if anyone fails to do what a man of the law says, like "stop, hands up, etc.", then the policeman has the lawful right to arrest you. If you try to shoot him, he can defend himself and shoot you. If you shoot a policeman, you should be arrested and the punishment should be you life's punishment, no exceptions, no parole.

 @9PQJGLJDemocrat from Florida commented…3mos3MO

You do realize self-defense is a two-way street? This seems like a naïve perspective as if an officer can do no wrong. And really, there are real crimes to arrest people for instead of not following directions, especially if they're unreasonable. You should hold high standards for officers as well, kill/injure a civilian, they should receive a harsh punishment.

 @57JJ5STfrom Ohio answered…4yrs4Y

Regardless, eliminate all tax-based police departments and allow the free market to provide police services

 @5KX4BRQfrom Ohio answered…4yrs4Y

All police should be re-trained to learn de-escalation techniques, etc. And if an officer uses excessive force at any time, they should be fired. We need a new approach to policing.

 @9D47SPKDemocrat from North Carolina answered…1yr1Y

Yes, this will protect the safety and rights of police officers and citizens, and we need reform so that any tampering with the device or footage comes with a clear consequence.

  @Jones4Potus2024  from Oregon answered…12mos12MO

Yes, and should face punitive action if they turn it off at any time while on duty

 @92DYGCT from Arizona answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, and they shouldn't be allowed to reduce or edit the video recorded by the body camera.

 @927TSKR from North Carolina answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, and they should be reprimanded for ever turning them off while on duty

 @4XYN4HZfrom Alabama answered…4yrs4Y

I believe that with the world we live in today, where a young man who actually committed two crimes (theft and beating a policeman until he had to go to the hospital) dies from being shot in self defense and he is the hero, it is absolutely 100% in the interest of the officer to wear this device. Generations struggled for equality and most did so under the non-violent protests and gatherings of Dr. King, Jr. Those courageous people did not suffer and bleed and March just for their grandchildren and great grandchildren could just throw down the race card and the start rioting and looting and…  Read more

 @8FYQYQH from Michigan answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but preferably, we should decrease the amount of police that we have in the first place, and spend the resources instead on helping the local community.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...