Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
经济 › 同工同酬
9>9 Personal answer不,还有太多其它可变因素了,比如教育、经验和任期都能决定公平的工资待遇 |
医保 › Pre-Existing Conditions
9>9 Personal answerNo, it is immoral to deny health insurance to people with pre-existing conditions |
社会 › Gun Buyback
9>9 Personal answerNo, this is a violation of the 2nd amendment |
医保 › 精神健康
9>9 Personal answer应该,但是只应增加个性化护理方面的资金,而不是资助制药公司 |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
9>9 Personal answerNo, athletes should compete based on the biological sex that is listed on their birth certificate |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
9>9 Personal answer不,但是我们应该禁止从“高危”国家移民。 |
教育 › Student Loan Forgiveness
9>9 Personal answerNo, a blanket reimbursement is the only way to pull this off. Which, would be astronomically expensive. |
国内政策 › 携带武器的教师
9>9 Personal answerYes, if they have a CCW permit. |
环境 › 气候变化
9>9 Personal answerNo, we need nuclear as a primary, green as a secondary, and fossil as a third alternate. |
经济 › 带薪病假
9>9 Personal answer不应该,私营企业应自主决定其提供给员工的竞争激励金额,而不应由政府强制要求 |
经济 › 税
9>9 Personal answerNo, abolish the scaling tax rate, reconvert to a flat tax (10-15%), and institute a wealth tax (0.5-1.5%) on individuals with assets greater than $50mill. |
外交政策 › 义务兵役
9>9 Personal answer应该,但是应该把重点放在教育和技能发展上,不要过于注重军事训练。 |
社会 › Racial Sensitivity Training
9>9 Personal answerNo, just ensure there are clear guidelines, action, and accountability for acts of discrimination |
教育 › Critical Race Theory in K-12 Education
9>9 Personal answerNo, it’s a flawed epistemological paradigm and has absolutely no praxis. It’s complete bull crap. Once again, grad student here, who is trained in both quant and qual, including CRT. CRT = straw man fallacy |
教育 › Free College for All
9>9 Personal answerNo, but provide more merit-based scholarships that are REGIONAL. |
社会 › Hate Speech
9>9 Personal answerYes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech |
社会 › 邦联旗
9>9 Personal answerNo, it should be put in a museum where it was originally flown |
国内政策 › 禁飞名单枪支管制
9>9 Personal answer不,如果没有经过法定程序,禁止任何人的权力都是违反宪法的 |
国内政策 › Supreme Court Reform
9>9 Personal answer不 |
国内政策 › 国家安全局国内监控
9>9 Personal answer不 |
移民 › 非法移民拘留
9>9 Personal answerYes, this is how the law works. If a state, however, legally passes legislation claiming sanctuary status, then no. |
医保 › 医疗补助
9>9 Personal answer否,而且各个州应该自行决定覆盖范围 |
国内政策 › 社交媒体监管
9>9 Personal answer不,社交媒体公司是私有公司,不应受政府监管 |
罪行 › Private Prisons
9>9 Personal answerYes, but eliminate contractual occupancy quotas |
罪行 › Qualified Immunity for Police
9>9 Personal answerNo, if your job is enforcing the law (which it is thanks to the Supreme Court for police), then you have a fiduciary responsibility to know what the law is. |
移民 › 庇护城市
9>9 Personal answerNo, they’re in violation of federal law without having the express constitutional powers granted to them. States are granted this right, if a state determines that they will allow sanctuary cities, then that’s their prerogative. Cities, however, do not have this legal power. |
医保 › 单一支付者医保
9>9 Personal answerNo, and oh wow these are some naive possible choices… |
环境 › Alaska Wildlife Refuge
9>9 Personal answerNo, and increase alternative energy subsidies to eliminate our dependence on fossil fuels |
经济 › 公司税
9>9 Personal answerNo, institute a flat tax rate (5-10% of profits) and institute a wealth tax (1-3%) on companies with assets greater than $50mill. |
社会 › 安全空间
9>9 Personal answerYes, but for those not ideologically represented in the majority, a.k.a. Not progressives. Safe space should be equivalent to “you will not be personally attacked for your psychographics or demographics” which is currently FAILING on our campuses. IM A GTA I KNOW WHAT THE HELL IM TALKING ABOUT. |
总统大选 › 选民作假
9>9 Personal answerYes, I need one to buy beer, drive a car, or just go out in public (illegal to be stopped and not able to identify yourself in many states even though we have the fourth amendment—it’s called “resisting arrest”) |
医保 › COVID Employment Health Pass
9>9 Personal answerNo, I think businesses should require vaccination but not by government mandate |
移民 › 移民同化
9>9 Personal answerNo, the US doesn’t have an official language. |
社会 › 宪法第一修正案
9>9 Personal answer应该,但不应该浪费金钱去删除现有的引用 |
国内政策 › 网路中立性
9>9 Personal answer是的,但是用种类决定优先权的派发(视频高于图像),而不是用来源(大网站高于小网站) |
医保 › Medicaid Work Requirement
9>9 Personal answerNo, the vast majority of people who receive Medicaid are disabled |
国内政策 › Congressional ban on stock trading
9>9 Personal answerYes, but with strict protections against insider trading |
国内政策 › 枪支责任
9>9 Personal answerNo, and this is a dumb question. |
罪行 › 对青少年的单独监禁
9>9 Personal answerNo, and “juvenile” doesn’t mean “child”, It means “younger than 18”. I have no problem with a 17 year old rapist (knew one who was in juvee), or 16 year old gang member, or even a 15 year old that swung on their teacher being put into a box and never let out. That’s where they belong. |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
9>9 Personal answerNo, increase funding and training for police departments in higher crime rate communities |
社会 › 安乐死
9>9 Personal answer是,但必须经过心理测试,确定他们完全理解这种选择的后果才可以 |
移民 › 公民考试
9>9 Personal answerYes, isn’t this already the case? |
移民 › 技术移民
9>9 Personal answer增加,我们的经济依赖于那些以最低的成本雇佣技术最好的工人的企业。 |
罪行 › Mandatory minimum prison sentences
9>9 Personal answer不 |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
9>9 Personal answer不应该,应当只有合法公民才可投票 |
医保 › Medicare Drug Prices
9>9 Personal answer不,政府不应该干涉自由市场 |
国内政策 › 积极行动
9>9 Personal answerNo, it’s inefficient and fails to achieve efficacy. Merit-based, regional, programs would be far more effective. |
医保 › Vaccine Mandates for Customers
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
罪行 › Demilitarize the Police
9>9 Personal answerYes, but with strict training on how and when to use the equipment |
总统大选 › 竞选经费
9>9 Personal answerNo, but allow donations from private companies. |
经济 › 经济刺激
9>9 Personal answerYes, but far too complex for this box. Essentially, data-driven decision-making based upon computational modeling and quantitative surveying. |
经济 › 资产增值税
9>9 Personal answerNo, limit it to 5% on capital gains, dividends, and real estate. No loopholes, not not paying. |
移民 › 州内学费
9>9 Personal answer不,他们应该承担和海外学生一样的费用 |
医保 › World Health Organization
9>9 Personal answerYes, but only relative to the amount that other countries contribute |
总统大选 › 候选人透明度
9>9 Personal answerNo, do any of you know how the constitution works? They’re citizens, private citizens, just like the rest of us. Having specific laws that apply to a specific class of people leads to one of two things: 1) discrimination, or 2) Aristocracy. Can we stop being stupid? |
总统大选 › 说客
9>9 Personal answerNo, the current two-year ban is a violation of those individual’s rights as private citizens already. Jesus, just make it a freaking license with rolling costs based on time disconnected from service. |
经济 › 加班费
9>9 Personal answerYes, but it’s complicated. Enforcing the current rules and standards would help, but those standards need to be updated to our current socioeconomic position. |
国内政策 › 征用
9>9 Personal answerYes, and for whatever the hell they want. This is the literal purpose of Civil government. |
总统大选 › Electoral College
9>9 Personal answerNo, the electoral college ensures representation of the whole country instead of just major cities |
外交政策 › 军费支出
9>9 Personal answerReconfigure spending to increase focus on R&D w/joint research between public-private-academic IP. Primarily for conversion to consumer products (see NASA IP for examples). Also, decrease foreign bases in Europe, create new training and education focused based in US (2x in Midwest, 1x in northeast), and expand our bases in Africa. |
罪行 › Collective Bargaining
9>9 Personal answerYes, and limit union-government contact across all unions. |
科学 › 核能
9>9 Personal answerYes, and we need it from the public sector, private sector, and a quasi public-private sector. |
外交政策 › 折磨
9>9 Personal answer是的,但只有当他们被定罪的恐怖分子 |
医保 › 退伍军人事务私有化
9>9 Personal answer更多,退伍军人应该可以去看任何他们选择的医生 |
教育 › School Vouchers
9>9 Personal answerYes, but only for students with exceptional athletic, academic, or service achievements |
外交政策 › 无人机
9>9 Personal answer是的,美国需要不择手段地与恐怖主义斗争 |
科学 › 转基因标签
9>9 Personal answer否,我们人工培育农作物已有几千年历史,而且标记只会使得人们产生,对科学毫无事实依据的耻辱感 |
罪行 › 监狱过度拥挤
9>9 Personal answer不应该,但是我们应该增加在为犯人提供教育和技能培训服务方面的资金 |
教育 › Universal Pre-K
9>9 Personal answer不 |
Housing › Homeless Encampments
9>9 Personal answerNo, but create a federal administrative program dedicated to providing additional aid (funding, materials, people) to state programs. |
交通运输 › 公共交通
9>9 Personal answerYes, and focus on public-private partnerships as well as regional SOE (see Hong Kong). |
经济 › 房地产遗产税
9>9 Personal answerNo, abolish this tax. Taxing someone for dying is… ridiculous. We could tax the explicit transfer of funds rather than the will and what was left, itself. |
移民 › 双重国籍
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
国家安全 › Military Congressional Approval
9>9 Personal answerNo, that’s not how the system works… for *war* yes, Congress requires approval. But… Johnson messed this up for everyone. Obama went into Libya for no good reason. It’s too late. |
经济 › Tech Monopolies
9>9 Personal answer不 |
环境 › Paris Climate Agreement
9>9 Personal answerYes, until other countries are held to the same standards |
国家安全 › Foreign Assassination
9>9 Personal answerYes, I was under the assumption that we already did. If we did, would we (citizens) ever know? |
科学 › 宇宙的探索
9>9 Personal answerYes, and reconfigure NASA as the space industry version of the SBA plus a public R&D firm. |
教育 › Open for Learning Recovery Benefit Program
9>9 Personal answerNo, and I wonder where those closures were with the worst effect… was it… blue states? |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
9>9 Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › 古巴
9>9 Personal answerNo, foreign intelligence services need to be removed before we allow increased trade and networking. Just look at the history of Cuba, it’s an intelligence services nightmare. |
教育 › School Truancy
9>9 Personal answer不 |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You side slightly towards “security”, meaning you more often believe the government should do everything within its power to ensure the security of its citizens. 这一主题是对你最重要的。
You are a centrist on left wing and right wing issues. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You are a centrist on democratic socialism and capitalism issues. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You side slightly towards “nationalism”, meaning you more often support policies that prioritize the interests of our nation above others. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You are a centrist on politically incorrect and politically correct issues. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You are a centrist on unilateralism and multilateralism issues. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You side slightly towards “religious”, meaning you more often support policies that reflect religious values and principles. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side slightly towards “deregulation”, meaning you more often believe that government regulation stifles innovation and economic prosperity. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on assimilation and multiculturalism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on pacifism and militarism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on traditional and progressive issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on isolationism and imperialism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on individualism and collectivism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side slightly towards “decentralization”, meaning you more often believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on tender and tough issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on small government and big government issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on keynesian and laissez-faire issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on anthropocentrism and environmentalism issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on meritocracy and democracy issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
Based on 18 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 14 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 14 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 10 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 18 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 11 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 10 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 18 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.