The Patriot Act was enacted in direct response to the September 11 attacks on the World Trade Center in New York City and the Pentagon in Arlington, Virginia, as well as the 2001 anthrax attacks, with the stated goal of dramatically strengthening national security. Opponents of the law have criticized its provision for indefinite detention of immigrants; permission to law enforcement to search a home or business without the owner’s or the occupant’s consent or knowledge under certain circumstances; the expanded use of National Security Letters, which allows the Federal Bureau…
Read more@N7VVPN3yrs3Y
Yes, and I also have no problem with profiling. If someone acts or appears like they may be a threat to the safety of others then they should deal with the consequences.
@LXRPLJ3yrs3Y
No and all the post 9/11 horse **** needs to be abolished.
@LQPMZC3yrs3Y
Yes, but only in cases of direct threat to American soil
@LQBPKX3yrs3Y
Government surveillance should be allowed in times of war, but should not intrude on the privacy of the people.
@G4QHHN3yrs3Y
yes but politicians should not be able to access it.
@G4J34C3yrs3Y
Find a middle groung on the Patriot Act
@G2WVJ43yrs3Y
I dont know enough about it to comment
@G2V6N93yrs3Y
Racial,Ethnic, profiling should be allowed when it involves the Security of the USA
and its citizens! Remove the TSA and Homeland Security and focus on beating and destroying those who would do harm to the USA and its citizens. Harsh and swift!
Send everyone who wants to destroy this Country or its citizens a free ride out....never to come back or be killed.