Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
国内政策 › 枪支管制
JP>JP Personal answerTraining should be implemented in school that requires constant gun safety curriculum and teaches the public to use them properly. |
医保 › Pre-Existing Conditions
JP>JP Personal answer不 |
社会 › Gun Buyback
JP>JP Personal answerNo, this is a violation of the 2nd amendment |
医保 › 精神健康
JP>JP Personal answer应该,我们的精神健康护理系统需要更多资金以提供更高质量的关怀和服务 |
社会 › 宗教自由法案
JP>JP Personal answer是的,但企业主必须张贴标志,说明他们的信仰和他们拒绝什么 |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
JP>JP Personal answerBiological females should never be pitted against trans men. |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
JP>JP Personal answer不,根据他们的宗教禁止移民是违反宪法的 |
教育 › Student Loan Forgiveness
JP>JP Personal answerN/A |
国内政策 › 携带武器的教师
JP>JP Personal answerIf they volunteer and are given firearms training on par with or greater than law enforcement. |
经济 › 税
JP>JP Personal answerOnly if we can do it without retaliation from large corporations with a stranglehold on the economy. We need to remove deductions and tax loopholes. |
社会 › Racial Sensitivity Training
JP>JP Personal answerNo, just ensure there are clear guidelines, action, and accountability for acts of discrimination |
教育 › Critical Race Theory in K-12 Education
JP>JP Personal answerIf the curriculum is subject to public evaluation and scrutiny. |
教育 › Free College for All
JP>JP Personal answerNo, but provide more scholarship opportunities for low-income students |
教育 › 学生贷款
JP>JP Personal answerNo, but we should still reduce interest rates for student loans |
社会 › Hate Speech
JP>JP Personal answerThis can be weaponized by those in power. Absolutely no regulation of hate speech unless it is used to mobilize violence and should be subject to the scrutiny of the public. |
社会 › 邦联旗
JP>JP Personal answerNo, it should be put in a museum where it was originally flown |
国内政策 › 禁飞名单枪支管制
JP>JP Personal answer不,如果没有经过法定程序,禁止任何人的权力都是违反宪法的 |
国内政策 › Supreme Court Reform
JP>JP Personal answer不 |
国内政策 › 操纵改划选区边界
JP>JP Personal answer是的,转换为一个按比例选举多个成员的重新分区的系统。 |
移民 › 非法移民拘留
JP>JP Personal answer不,仅在他们犯了暴力罪行时再这样做 |
国内政策 › 社交媒体监管
JP>JP Personal answerAs long as it is subject to public evaluation, scrutiny and chastisement. |
罪行 › Private Prisons
JP>JP Personal answer不 |
罪行 › Qualified Immunity for Police
JP>JP Personal answer不 |
社会 › 工作场所性别多元化
JP>JP Personal answerNo, but if it does not occur naturally when the opportunity presents itself then that company should be investigated for discrimination. |
环境 › 可替代能源
JP>JP Personal answerNo, it is inferior to hydrogen and nuclear fusion, which is far more environmentally friendly and sustainable. |
移民 › 庇护城市
JP>JP Personal answerOnly if that funding is geared towards having immigrants apply for citizenship. |
环境 › Alaska Wildlife Refuge
JP>JP Personal answerNo, and increase alternative energy subsidies to eliminate our dependence on fossil fuels |
社会 › 安全空间
JP>JP Personal answerNo, college is meant to challenge students thoughts and opinions so they are prepared for real life |
总统大选 › 选民作假
JP>JP Personal answerI see it no different than requiring ID to enter state and federal buildings, buy firearms and alcohol, and tobacco. |
国内政策 › 爱国者法案
JP>JP Personal answerNo, and pass strict laws prohibiting government surveillance without probable cause and a warrant |
医保 › COVID Employment Health Pass
JP>JP Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › Ukrainian Defense Funding
JP>JP Personal answerN/A |
国内政策 › 网路中立性
JP>JP Personal answer不,平等对待所有的通信量,并继续保持互联网的开放性 |
社会 › 宪法第一修正案
JP>JP Personal answerThough I agree that government should not dictate, regulate or discriminate against any religion, I don't see the point in removing existing references. |
医保 › Medicaid Work Requirement
JP>JP Personal answer不 |
国内政策 › Congressional ban on stock trading
JP>JP Personal answerNo, and their investments should be held in a blind trust |
国内政策 › 枪支责任
JP>JP Personal answerA company can be sued for whatever reason. |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
JP>JP Personal answerYes, replace police with unarmed community based responders for non-violent calls |
罪行 › Mandatory minimum prison sentences
JP>JP Personal answer不 |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
JP>JP Personal answerIf they become citizens. |
医保 › 安全港
JP>JP Personal answerIf these places are joint rehab. |
医保 › Medicare Drug Prices
JP>JP Personal answer是的 |
医保 › Vaccine Mandates for Customers
JP>JP Personal answer不 |
罪行 › Demilitarize the Police
JP>JP Personal answerNo, extreme situations should be handled by higher agencies with specialized training and equipment |
经济 › 资产增值税
JP>JP Personal answerYes, but only on those above middle class income. |
教育 › 常见的核心
JP>JP Personal answerSTEM should be the absolute main focus of education K -12 |
移民 › 州内学费
JP>JP Personal answer是,只要他们纳税 |
医保 › World Health Organization
JP>JP Personal answerAs long as their work and studies are transparent and available for the public to scrutinize and evaluate. |
环境 › 石油钻井
JP>JP Personal answerOnly as sufficient to keep the economy afloat until environmentally friendly power sources can be used instead. |
环境 › 水力压裂法
JP>JP Personal answerWe should be heavily focused on making sustainable resources more viable. |
总统大选 › 说客
JP>JP Personal answer是的,而且禁止一切形式的游说 |
国内政策 › 征用
JP>JP Personal answer否,而且永远都不应该允许政府没收私人财产 |
外交政策 › 军费支出
JP>JP Personal answerOnly in joint disarmament agreement with other large militaries like Russia, China and India. |
总统大选 › Electoral College
JP>JP Personal answerYes, and switch to a ranked voting system |
罪行 › Collective Bargaining
JP>JP Personal answer是的 |
环境 › Animal Testing
JP>JP Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › 折磨
JP>JP Personal answer不,酷刑是不人道、不道德的,并违反第八修正案 |
教育 › School Vouchers
JP>JP Personal answer是的但只针对低收入家庭 |
外交政策 › 无人机
JP>JP Personal answer不,只应该搜集情报,而不杀恐怖分子嫌疑人 |
外交政策 › Taliban Financial Aid
JP>JP Personal answer不 |
罪行 › 监狱过度拥挤
JP>JP Personal answer不应该,但是我们应该增加在为犯人提供教育和技能培训服务方面的资金 |
教育 › Universal Pre-K
JP>JP Personal answerN/A |
Housing › Homeless Encampments
JP>JP Personal answerThey should be provided designated and protected places. |
移民 › 双重国籍
JP>JP Personal answer是,除非他们实施了恐怖主义行为 |
国家安全 › Military Congressional Approval
JP>JP Personal answer不 |
经济 › Tech Monopolies
JP>JP Personal answerN/A |
环境 › Paris Climate Agreement
JP>JP Personal answerI am not aware of the stipulations within the agreement, so I have no comment. |
国家安全 › Foreign Assassination
JP>JP Personal answerNo, they should be captured and given a fair trial |
教育 › Open for Learning Recovery Benefit Program
JP>JP Personal answer是的 |
经济 › 离岸银行业务
JP>JP Personal answerOnly if they are allies or neutral countries. |
外交政策 › India Arms
JP>JP Personal answerWe should be making joint efforts with large countries (e.g. China, India, Russia, etc) to disarm and disable our militaries, especially nuclear weapons. |
国内政策 › Edward Snowden(爱德华·斯诺登)
JP>JP Personal answer是的,作为替代,请调查中央情报局和国家安全局局长 |
外交政策 › Jerusalem
JP>JP Personal answer是的 |
教育 › School Truancy
JP>JP Personal answerN/A |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
JP>JP Personal answerYes, but only if local citizens can vote on the amount of incentives to offer |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You side slightly towards “security”, meaning you more often believe the government should do everything within its power to ensure the security of its citizens. 这一主题是对你最重要的。
You are a centrist on left wing and right wing issues. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You are a centrist on democratic socialism and capitalism issues. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You side slightly towards “nationalism”, meaning you more often support policies that prioritize the interests of our nation above others. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You are a centrist on politically incorrect and politically correct issues. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You are a centrist on unilateralism and multilateralism issues. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You side slightly towards “religious”, meaning you more often support policies that reflect religious values and principles. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side slightly towards “deregulation”, meaning you more often believe that government regulation stifles innovation and economic prosperity. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on assimilation and multiculturalism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on pacifism and militarism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on traditional and progressive issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on isolationism and imperialism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on individualism and collectivism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side slightly towards “decentralization”, meaning you more often believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on tender and tough issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on small government and big government issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on keynesian and laissez-faire issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on anthropocentrism and environmentalism issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on meritocracy and democracy issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
Based on 18 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 14 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 14 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 10 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 17 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 11 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 10 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 10 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 18 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 18 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.